Recent social media outbursts by US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have ignited a fiery debate on Wall Street about the future of Fed communication. Bessent launched a scathing attack on journalist Nick Timiraos, known as the "Fed's mouthpiece," accusing him of being a mere "stenographer" who is incapable of genuine economic analysis. The Treasury Secretary argued that under the "Walsh era," such reporters will be reduced to covering internal gossip, as they are lost without having information "chewed up and fed to them."
Interestingly, just days after Bessent's post, a British media outlet published an exclusive report citing "sources close to Walsh." These sources provided a clear outline of the new Fed chair's communication goals following his first two rate-setting meetings, leaving market participants still grappling with key questions. The biggest unknowns include whether Kevin Walsh is a "hawk with a dove's heart" who actually wants to cut rates, how his relationship with President Trump will influence Fed policy, and whether his newly formed task force can deliver meaningful reform.
Jason Furman, a Harvard economics professor and former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, noted that Walsh has been a vocal critic of the Fed for the past 15 years. "He is very smart and experienced, but his past critiques were often superficial, never detailing how he would act differently," Furman said. "Now he is making the transition from critic to leader, and his smart strategy is to simply not answer any questions."
The spark for Bessent's online fury was a straightforward report by Timiraos revealing Bessent's attempt to involve the Fed in the Trump administration's efforts to support the yen. By publicly attacking the journalist, Bessent signaled to the market that the old "Fed whisperer" has lost his access and comparative advantage under the new regime. Timiraos earned his reputation during the 2022 aggressive rate hike cycle, where his precise pre-releases of policy signals, like the July 2022 hint of a 75 basis point hike, shaped market expectations.
As the old "Fed mouthpiece" is declared obsolete, a new communication channel is emerging. Sources close to Walsh admitted to the British media that he has made some mistakes in his first ten weeks, including failing to strengthen his key message on price stability and creating confusion about the impact of long-term reforms. However, they insisted these errors do not change his reform direction. With the Fed having missed its 2% inflation target for over five years, Walsh's core strategy is to drastically reduce forward guidance to the market.
Insiders revealed that if upcoming inflation data remains strong, Walsh is prepared to raise rates at the September meeting. CME Group data shows futures markets currently price a 55% chance of a 25 basis point hike in September. While Walsh has raised the possibility of shrinking the $6.7 trillion balance sheet, rates remain the primary tool for now. He is expected to use his first speech at the Jackson Hole symposium to explain the theory behind his "silent revolution" and clarify his past communication missteps.
However, some believe Walsh faces stricter scrutiny due to his perceived close ties to the President. Robert Brusca, chief economist at FAO Economics, said, "There is a deep-seated suspicion that Walsh is a Trump man, through and through. It will be hard for people to trust him unless he proves otherwise."
Opinions are divided on whether Walsh is a "hawk with a dove's heart." In a recent interview, Bessent questioned the need for a rate hike, arguing that "core inflation has been stable and will remain so." Furman, however, predicted one rate hike this year, possibly in September, because "this bout of inflation might actually be more temporary."
Regarding Walsh's streamlined communication strategy, Furman believes he is wise to take his time to think. The five task forces, covering communication, balance sheet, data, productivity, and inflation, could help share his intellectual load. The group leaders include heavyweights like former Bank of England Governor Mervyn King, who co-chairs the communication group. Four of the groups are led by Harvard economics professors, including Greg Mankiw, Furman's own PhD advisor. While Furman calls the group "a collection of outstanding talent," he doubts they can solve the core issues Walsh has been discussing. "A data group cannot fix the problem of frequent data revisions, and a balance sheet group will not lead to its complete elimination," Furman concluded. "So, I think people will eventually have to face reality."
Comments