If Grab and Foodpanda Start a Price War, Will Users Truly Benefit or Pay the Price Later?

Tiger_SG
2025-04-29
Reward Tiger-CoinsReward 500 Tiger-coins

China’s ongoing food delivery war has dominated headlines recently. According to Bloomberg's estimates, the mutual price-cutting and rivalry between $JD.com(JD)$ and $MEITUAN-W(03690)$ have wiped out around $70 billion USD in combined market value.

To compete for users, JD.com and Meituan have launched a variety of discount coupons and subsidy campaigns, leading to a noticeable drop in average food delivery prices. Promotions like 4-yuan Luckin Coffee and 8-yuan branded lunches have become increasingly common. This week, Meituan even offered a free $Luckin Coffee Inc.(LKNCY)$ campaign to its members — TC just got a free cup in Beijing today[666][666]

Despite the stock price drops, consumers are welcoming the cheap delivery meals. The last time we saw such intense subsidy wars was about a decade ago.

In 2014, the ride-hailing war erupted, and subsidies were also the main weapon. In just 2015 alone, data from $DiDi Global Inc.(DIDIY)$ and $Uber(UBER)$ indicated that their combined losses had exceeded 20 billion RMB.

These cash-burning strategies do help gain market share, but the side effects are obvious. Most importantly, every price war has historically ended with price hikes, as capital eventually demands a return.

That’s why some warn that if JD.com or Meituan wins this war, it will ultimately be consumers who foot the bill. They argue that keeping the giants in fierce competition is the best outcome for consumers.

What if a similar situation happened in Singapore?

According to a report from research firm Momentum Works, $Grab Holdings(GRAB)$ and foodpanda control about 91% of Singapore’s $2.5 billion USD food delivery market, with Grab alone holding a 63% share.

In 2024, the planned merger between Grab and foodpanda fell through, and Singapore’s competition watchdog concluded its investigation. What will happen if the two giants start a price war in Singapore?

Food delivery isn’t a good business: is it still worth investing in companies like JD.com, Meituan, or Grab?

Looking beyond this delivery war, we see that such intense business battles are rare in other markets.

For example, none of the “Magnificent Seven” U.S. tech giants have local services as their core business. Even under the previous FAANG classification, local lifestyle services were never part of the picture. The only e-commerce giant is Amazon, and it has not ventured deep into food delivery either.

Actually, $Amazon.com(AMZN)$ launched Amazon Restaurants in 2015, but repeatedly struggled against specialized competitors like Grubhub, DoorDash, and Uber Eats, ultimately choosing to exit the food delivery business entirely in 2019.

Amazon to shutter Amazon RestaurantsAmazon to shutter Amazon Restaurants

At the beginning of the war, JD.com stated that it aims to keep the profit margin of its food delivery business below 5%, while in fact, Meituan’s food delivery profit margin has always been around 3%.

  • Is burning cash to gain market share really worth it?

  • Competition vs. monopoly — which model better serves consumers?

  • Are food delivery companies like JD, Meituan, and Grab still worth investing in?

Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

A tool to boost your purchasing power and trading ideas with CashBoost! Open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with upcoming 0-commission, unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs. Find out more here.

Other helpful links:

Grab a Grab? Time to Return $5 With Lifted Guidance?
Grab Holdings raised its full-year forecast for a key profitability metric, citing continued growth in monthly transacting users, cost discipline and overall revenue growth as factors driving its business. ------------------ What's your target price for Grab? Are you bullish on the stock after guidance is raised?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Reward expired
Due to insufficient number of valid participants, 500Tiger coins have been refunded to the initiator
Deadline to 05/08 01:50
Reward-post

Comments

  • icycrystal
    2025-04-29
    icycrystal
    @GoodLife99 @Universe宇宙 @SPACE ROCKET @TigerGPT @rL @Shyon @Aqa @LMSunshine @koolgal @HelenJanet

    China’s ongoing food delivery war has dominated headlines recently. According to Bloomberg's estimates, the mutual price-cutting and rivalry between $JD.com(JD)$ and $MEITUAN-W(03690)$ have wiped out around $70 billion USD in combined market value.

    According to a report from research firm Momentum Works, $Grab Holdings(GRAB)$ and foodpanda control about 91% of Singapore’s $2.5 billion USD food delivery market, with Grab alone holding a 63% share.

    Is burning cash to gain market share really worth it?


    Competition vs. monopoly — which model better serves consumers?


    Are food delivery companies like JD, Meituan, and Grab still worth investing in?


    Leave your comments to win tiger coins~

    • koolgal
      Thanks for sharing 😍😍😍
    • Shyon
      thanks 😊😊😊
  • Shyon
    2025-04-30
    Shyon
    我发现中国的送餐大战既有趣又令人担忧。虽然像4元瑞星咖啡这样的廉价餐食现在对消费者来说很棒,但历史表明,一旦一个参与者占据主导地位,这些补贴战争通常会以价格上涨而告终。2015年的网约车大战就是一个明显的例子——资本最终要求回报,而消费者为此付出代价。

    如果Grab和foodpanda在新加坡发生类似的战争,我们可能会在短期内享受折扣,但长期来看有失去竞争的风险。Grab已经控制了63%的市场,因此如果foodpanda跟不上,主导地位可能会导致价格上涨和创新减少。

    作为投资者,我对京东、美团-W或Grab等食品配送公司持谨慎态度。利润率很低,亏损很高,甚至亚马逊也退出了这项业务。如果没有实现可持续利润的明确途径,我宁愿在更具可扩展性、可防御的领域寻找机会。

    @Tiger_SG @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerGPT

  • koolgal
    2025-04-30
    koolgal
    🌟🌟🌟Competition versus Monopoly - Which is better for consumers?  I believe that overall a competitive market structure tends to serve consumers better.  The main reasons are lower prices, encouraging innovation and providing  diverse product choices.

    Competition between Meituan and JD.com is good for consumers as it means lower prices or food discounts .  If Meituan does not have any competition, there is no incentive for them to innovate and try harder .

    The same thing goes for Grab and Food Panda .

    Market thrives on competition like everything else in life .  It brings out  the best in everything we do .

    @Tiger_SG @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @CaptainTiger @TigerClub

  • ee244c
    2025-05-01
    ee244c
    Any price war is always good for the consumer, only worry is once the competitors got knock off it may becomes a monopoly and price starts to escalate which is bad for the consumer . If the watchdog is not careful and monopolistic arises it is bad.
  • SPACE ROCKET
    2025-04-30
    SPACE ROCKET
    Grab's dominance in ride-hailing and its strong financial position have given it an advantage in the food delivery market.

    however, it's still a stock I'd stay away from.

  • SPACE ROCKET
    2025-04-30
    SPACE ROCKET
    In the food delivery market, Grab currently has a larger market share in Singapore than Foodpanda, with Grabfood holding a 56% market share compared to Foodpanda's 35% in May 2022. While Foodpanda was once a major player in the Southeast Asian food delivery market, Grab has expanded its dominance, particularly in Singapore.

    @JiaDeName

Leave a comment
27
14