📋J.P. Morgan: Memory Giants Market Cap Points to $1.5T (+50%) by 2027

AI_Dig
12-16 18:15

Source: This article is adapted from analysis shared by Jukan ✈️Semicon Japan (@jukan05) on X (Twitter), based on J.P. Morgan’s latest memory industry research.

1. Market Cap Nearing $1 Trillion — Is the Rally Over?

In its latest research report, J.P. Morgan $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ highlights that the combined market capitalization of leading global memory manufacturers is approaching $1 trillion. Based on historical valuation medians, JPM projects that this figure could expand to $1.5 trillion by 2027, implying over 50% upside potential from current levels for top-tier memory players.

From an equity investor’s perspective, this framing is important: JPM is not merely forecasting earnings growth, but arguing that the entire valuation framework of the memory sector is undergoing a structural re-rating, driven by AI-led demand.

On December 14, JPM further emphasized that the current memory cycle is shaping up to be the longest and strongest up-cycle in industry history.


2. Supply Concerns vs. AI Reality: Why 2027 Oversupply Fears May Be Overstated

A key concern among investors is that new capacity coming online in 2027 could trigger DRAM oversupply. JPM directly addresses this bearish thesis using a bottom-up data model and concludes that such fears are largely unfounded.

  • HBM crowding-out effect: Capacity is increasingly diverted to High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), limiting supply growth for conventional DRAM.

  • AI inference demand: JPM notes that AI inference workloads consume roughly 3× more memory than training, creating sustained structural demand.

For investors, this suggests that headline capex announcements alone are insufficient to assess future supply risks—product mix and end-demand matter more than raw wafer capacity.


3. “Dual-Track” Pricing: Enterprise Strength Offsets Consumer Weakness

JPM observes that the memory market is entering a dual-track pricing environment:

  • B2B / Enterprise / AI: Strong demand from cloud service providers (CSPs) continues to support elevated pricing.

  • B2C / Consumer: Cyclical pressure remains, with price sensitivity limiting upside.

However, JPM’s core view is that server-side demand growth will more than offset consumer softness, keeping the overall pricing environment constructive. For equity holders, this reinforces the idea that exposure to AI-facing memory suppliers matters more than broad consumer electronics cycles.


4. Valuation Reset: Why JPM Says “Stay Long”

With memory stocks having surged over the past three months and market cap nearing $1 trillion, JPM addresses the key investor question: What comes next?

Their answer is unambiguous: Stay Long.

Using a Market Cap / TAM (Total Addressable Market) framework:

  • JPM estimates the memory market will reach ~$420 billion in size by 2027.

  • Applying the median P/S multiple of 3.5× from prior cycle peaks (2018, 2021),

  • The combined market cap of leading memory and storage companies could approach $1.5 trillion.

This implies more than 50% upside from current levels, assuming the cycle unfolds as modeled.


5. Supply–Demand Reality Check: Still Tight in 2027

The dominant short thesis argues that new fabs and accelerated process migration will flip the market into oversupply by 2027. JPM strongly refutes this using a “Capacity-Bit” analysis:

  • Shortage persists: The supply-demand gap may narrow from 5% in 2026 to 3% in 2027, but remains in deficit.

  • HBM penetration rises: HBM’s share of total DRAM capacity is expected to jump from 19% (2025) to 28% (2027).

  • Physical constraints: Despite new fabs (e.g., $SAMSUNG ETFS TR.(SGCRF)$ , $SK Hynix, Inc.(HXSCF)$ $SK Hynix, Inc.(HXSCL)$ , cleanroom limits and process complexity cap DRAM bit growth at <20%.

From an investment standpoint, this supports the thesis that pricing power may weaken at the margin—but does not collapse.


6. B2B Feast, B2C Cycle: Pricing Outlook by Segment

JPM expects pricing polarization from 2H 2026 to 1H 2027:

  • B2B (AI-driven): Prices remain firm, supported by inference workloads.

  • B2C (Consumer): Cyclical price declines due to resistance at elevated levels.

Key Forecasts:

  • FY26E: DRAM ASP +53%; NAND ASP +30%

  • FY27E: DRAM ASP +1%; NAND ASP -6%

This suggests a transition from explosive upside to high-level consolidation, rather than a classic cycle downturn.


7. AI Structural Drivers: HBM and Enterprise SSD in Focus

HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) JPM highlights HBM as a major beneficiary of ongoing GPU vs. ASIC competition:

  • Google’s next-gen 2nm TPU may adopt HBM4 $Alphabet(GOOG)$ $Alphabet(GOOGL)$

  • Rubin Ultra GPUs imply a 4× memory capacity increase

  • JPM expects an 8–12% HBM supply gap to persist through 2027, potentially extending into 2028

Enterprise SSD (eSSD) AI inference servers require ~3× the SSD capacity of traditional servers.

With HDD vendors guiding conservatively on 2026 capex, JPM expects eSSD demand to surge, pushing NAND prices up ~27% in FY26.

For investors, these segments represent structural growth exposures, not cyclical trades.


8. Capex Discipline: Expansion Without Excess

While memory makers have announced expansion plans, JPM stresses that bit supply growth remains disciplined:

  • WFE outpaces capex: DRAM WFE growth of 19% (2026) and 26% (2027)

  • Capital intensity remains controlled:

    • DRAM: <30%

    • NAND: <20% Both below the 5-year average.

This reinforces JPM’s central thesis: the industry has learned from past cycles, and supply discipline is likely to persist.


Takeaway for Investors

JPM’s message is clear: the memory sector is no longer just a cyclical rebound story—it is undergoing a structural re-rating driven by AI. While volatility and segment divergence remain, the bank believes the path toward a $1.5 trillion market cap by 2027 is still intact.

Discussion:

  1. Do you agree with J.P. Morgan’s view that this will be the strongest and longest memory up-cycle in history?

  2. From an investor’s perspective, which segment offers better risk-reward over the next 12–24 months: HBM leaders or NAND / eSSD beneficiaries?

  3. With consumer demand still cyclical but AI server demand accelerating, how would you position memory stocks in your portfolio today—core holding or tactical trade?


For SG users only, Welcome to open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs.

🎉Cash Boost Account Now Supports 35,000+ Stocks & ETFs – Greater Flexibility Now

Find out more here.

Complete your first Cash Boost Account trade with a trade amount of ≥ SGD1000* to get SGD 688 stock vouchers*! The trade can be executed using any payment type available under the Cash Boost Account: Cash, CPF, SRS, or CDP.

Click to access the activity

Other helpful links:

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
12