This perspective rightly calls

This perspective rightly calls out “AI bubble” talk as absolute nonsense, pushing back against the lazy headline narrative by grounding the discussion in capital structure realities and cash flow discipline; AI is being built on real earnings power, strong balance sheets and robust enterprise demand, so the task for everyone is not to panic at every drawdown, but to distinguish normal cyclical volatility from any true deterioration in cash flows or credit quality.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management: AI Funding Concerns Overblown, Trillion-Dollar Capex Backed by Tech Giants' Cash Flow

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":511789762265328,"tweetId":"511789762265328","gmtCreate":1765976225018,"gmtModify":1765977888321,"author":{"id":4092737024653350,"idStr":"4092737024653350","authorId":4092737024653350,"authorIdStr":"4092737024653350","name":"alexliam","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/800d9eeaf25151ecb80e9675139f8bc2","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.12.14","exceedPercentage":"80.34%","individualDisplayEnabled":0},"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":1,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>This perspective rightly calls out “AI bubble” talk as absolute nonsense, pushing back against the lazy headline narrative by grounding the discussion in capital structure realities and cash flow discipline; AI is being built on real earnings power, strong balance sheets and robust enterprise demand, so the task for everyone is not to panic at every drawdown, but to distinguish normal cyclical volatility from any true deterioration in cash flows or credit quality.</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>This perspective rightly calls out “AI bubble” talk as absolute nonsense, pushing back against the lazy headline narrative by grounding the discussion in capital structure realities and cash flow discipline; AI is being built on real earnings power, strong balance sheets and robust enterprise demand, so the task for everyone is not to panic at every drawdown, but to distinguish normal cyclical volatility from any true deterioration in cash flows or credit quality.</p></body></html>","text":"This perspective rightly calls out “AI bubble” talk as absolute nonsense, pushing back against the lazy headline narrative by grounding the discussion in capital structure realities and cash flow discipline; AI is being built on real earnings power, strong balance sheets and robust enterprise demand, so the task for everyone is not to panic at every drawdown, but to distinguish normal cyclical volatility from any true deterioration in cash flows or credit quality.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/511789762265328","repostId":1181374063,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1181374063","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Global Stock News First-Time Broadcast","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock News","id":"1036600163","head_image":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a"},"pubTimestamp":1765966609,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181374063?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-12-17 18:16","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Goldman Sachs Asset Management: AI Funding Concerns Overblown, Trillion-Dollar Capex Backed by Tech Giants' Cash Flow","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181374063","media":"Stock News","summary":"Goldman Sachs Asset Management's Sung Cho, Co-Head of Technology Investing and U.S. Fundamental Equity, recently conveyed a reassuring message during a discussion with Scott Wapner: the widespread...","content":"<p>Goldman Sachs Asset Management's Sung Cho, Co-Head of Technology Investing and U.S. Fundamental Equity, recently conveyed a reassuring message during a discussion with Scott Wapner: the widespread anxiety over AI financing—often triggered by volatile valuations and perceived fragility—is largely exaggerated. The conversation explored the trajectory of AI investments, broader market prospects, and the underlying stability of the sector's capital structure, offering nuanced insights for founders, venture capitalists, and industry professionals navigating this transformative era.</p>\n<p>Cho challenged the narrative of an impending AI bubble by analyzing the capital sources fueling the current boom. He emphasized that most AI investments are not reliant on speculative debt but are instead backed by robust internal cash flows from established tech giants. This distinction is critical in understanding the long-term resilience of the AI market.</p>\n<p>Quantifying the massive capital inflows into AI, Cho stated, \"Considering the total expenditure required over the next few years, we estimate it to be between $700 billion and $1 trillion. What should ease concerns is that 90% of this is funded by operating cash flows.\" This heavy reliance on internal capital—rather than external debt—highlights a fundamental strength in AI investment, differentiating it from past tech speculation cycles.</p>\n<p>The implications are significant: companies are financing their AI ambitions from a position of financial health rather than leveraging themselves into precarious positions. Moreover, even the smaller portion of AI investments funded through debt remains stable. Cho noted that a substantial share of this debt is issued by high-rated entities, explaining, \"Only about 10% is debt-funded—and much of that is issued by Meta, whose credit rating surpasses even the U.S. government, with bond spreads tighter than Treasuries.\" This indicates that AI-related debt financing is concentrated in highly creditworthy firms, not speculative enterprises with shaky balance sheets, further mitigating systemic risk.</p>\n<p>Addressing concerns about specific companies like Coreweave (CRWV.US) and Oracle (ORCL.US), which have faced recent market turbulence, Cho clarified that these cases do not reflect weakening AI demand. Instead, they stem from operational challenges or supply chain bottlenecks. \"By 2026, funding won’t be the issue,\" he said. \"For Coreweave and Oracle, the problem isn’t demand—it’s supply chain backlogs.\" This distinction is crucial for investors, as it suggests company-specific setbacks are temporary and solvable rather than indicators of broader industry decline.</p>\n<p>Cho’s second key insight revolves around the dynamic and inherently volatile nature of leadership in foundational AI models. Rapid shifts in perceived frontrunners define this emerging market—today’s leader could be overtaken tomorrow. He highlighted the swift changes in investor sentiment and market valuations among top AI players, observing, \"Look at how perceptions shifted in 2025 alone: early in the year, Meta was seen as the dominant model; six months later, OpenAI took the lead; and recently, Google has surged ahead in investors’ eyes.\"</p>\n<p>This competitive fluidity, while generating notable stock volatility, reflects fierce innovation battles rather than systemic market weakness. The financial impact is staggering—for instance, Google’s $1 trillion market cap surge over three months was directly tied to its perceived technological edge with Gemini. Such rapid reallocations of investor confidence underscore how leadership perceptions can reshape valuations overnight.</p>\n<p>The dynamic environment will persist, with upcoming advancements—like models trained on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture in early 2026—likely triggering further volatility and leadership shifts. As innovation accelerates, market participants should expect continuous realignments in perceived dominance.</p>\n<p>Ultimately, Cho’s analysis paints a picture of an AI market underpinned by ample capital, primarily sustained through operational cash flows rather than precarious leverage. While competition among leading AI developers will remain intensely volatile, these fluctuations are natural outcomes of rapid innovation, not signs of systemic financial fragility. Though anxieties persist, they appear overstated when examined against the sector’s underlying financial health and demand fundamentals.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Goldman Sachs Asset Management: AI Funding Concerns Overblown, Trillion-Dollar Capex Backed by Tech Giants' Cash Flow</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoldman Sachs Asset Management: AI Funding Concerns Overblown, Trillion-Dollar Capex Backed by Tech Giants' Cash Flow\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036600163\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3bf6d02ad1a6e9e7377eebbb162346a);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock News </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-12-17 18:16</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Goldman Sachs Asset Management's Sung Cho, Co-Head of Technology Investing and U.S. Fundamental Equity, recently conveyed a reassuring message during a discussion with Scott Wapner: the widespread anxiety over AI financing—often triggered by volatile valuations and perceived fragility—is largely exaggerated. The conversation explored the trajectory of AI investments, broader market prospects, and the underlying stability of the sector's capital structure, offering nuanced insights for founders, venture capitalists, and industry professionals navigating this transformative era.</p>\n<p>Cho challenged the narrative of an impending AI bubble by analyzing the capital sources fueling the current boom. He emphasized that most AI investments are not reliant on speculative debt but are instead backed by robust internal cash flows from established tech giants. This distinction is critical in understanding the long-term resilience of the AI market.</p>\n<p>Quantifying the massive capital inflows into AI, Cho stated, \"Considering the total expenditure required over the next few years, we estimate it to be between $700 billion and $1 trillion. What should ease concerns is that 90% of this is funded by operating cash flows.\" This heavy reliance on internal capital—rather than external debt—highlights a fundamental strength in AI investment, differentiating it from past tech speculation cycles.</p>\n<p>The implications are significant: companies are financing their AI ambitions from a position of financial health rather than leveraging themselves into precarious positions. Moreover, even the smaller portion of AI investments funded through debt remains stable. Cho noted that a substantial share of this debt is issued by high-rated entities, explaining, \"Only about 10% is debt-funded—and much of that is issued by Meta, whose credit rating surpasses even the U.S. government, with bond spreads tighter than Treasuries.\" This indicates that AI-related debt financing is concentrated in highly creditworthy firms, not speculative enterprises with shaky balance sheets, further mitigating systemic risk.</p>\n<p>Addressing concerns about specific companies like Coreweave (CRWV.US) and Oracle (ORCL.US), which have faced recent market turbulence, Cho clarified that these cases do not reflect weakening AI demand. Instead, they stem from operational challenges or supply chain bottlenecks. \"By 2026, funding won’t be the issue,\" he said. \"For Coreweave and Oracle, the problem isn’t demand—it’s supply chain backlogs.\" This distinction is crucial for investors, as it suggests company-specific setbacks are temporary and solvable rather than indicators of broader industry decline.</p>\n<p>Cho’s second key insight revolves around the dynamic and inherently volatile nature of leadership in foundational AI models. Rapid shifts in perceived frontrunners define this emerging market—today’s leader could be overtaken tomorrow. He highlighted the swift changes in investor sentiment and market valuations among top AI players, observing, \"Look at how perceptions shifted in 2025 alone: early in the year, Meta was seen as the dominant model; six months later, OpenAI took the lead; and recently, Google has surged ahead in investors’ eyes.\"</p>\n<p>This competitive fluidity, while generating notable stock volatility, reflects fierce innovation battles rather than systemic market weakness. The financial impact is staggering—for instance, Google’s $1 trillion market cap surge over three months was directly tied to its perceived technological edge with Gemini. Such rapid reallocations of investor confidence underscore how leadership perceptions can reshape valuations overnight.</p>\n<p>The dynamic environment will persist, with upcoming advancements—like models trained on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture in early 2026—likely triggering further volatility and leadership shifts. As innovation accelerates, market participants should expect continuous realignments in perceived dominance.</p>\n<p>Ultimately, Cho’s analysis paints a picture of an AI market underpinned by ample capital, primarily sustained through operational cash flows rather than precarious leverage. While competition among leading AI developers will remain intensely volatile, these fluctuations are natural outcomes of rapid innovation, not signs of systemic financial fragility. Though anxieties persist, they appear overstated when examined against the sector’s underlying financial health and demand fundamentals.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"159399":"现金流","LU2471134952.CNY":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (CNYHDG) INC","LU1868836591.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"1U\"(USD) ACC","LU0106831901.USD":"贝莱德世界金融基金A2","LU2471134879.HKD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (HKD) INC","AMZN":"亚马逊","LU1668664300.SGD":"Blackrock World Financials A2 SGD-H","LU1868836757.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"2\" (USD) ACC","LU0742534661.SGD":"Fidelity America A-SGD (hedged)","IE00B19Z3B42.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Value A Acc SGD","GS":"高盛","LU2471134523.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU2265009873.SGD":"Eastspring Investments - Global Growth Equity AS SGD-H","GOOG":"谷歌","MSFT":"微软","LU2471134796.USD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (USD) INC","LU0096364046.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"DU\" (USD) ACC","BK4127":"投资银行业与经纪业","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","IE0002270589.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE VALUE \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2750360641.GBP":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (GBPHDG) INC","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2237438978.USD":"Amundi Funds US Pioneer A2 (C) USD","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","BK4516":"特朗普概念","LU0048573561.USD":"FIDELITY AMERICA \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1791807156.HKD":"BGF WORLD FINANCIALS \"A2\" (HKDHDG) ACC","LU2750360997.AUD":"INVESCO GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME ADVANTAGE \"A\" (AUDHDG) INC","XMAG":"Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF","LU2237443382.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA USD","LU1894683264.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS US EQUITY RESEARCH VALUE \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0251131958.USD":"FIDELITY AMERICA \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0251142724.SGD":"Fidelity America A-SGD","BK4504":"桥水持仓","LU0345770308.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2237443549.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A MIncA SGD-H","LU0345770993.USD":"NINETY ONE GSF GLOBAL STRATEGIC EQUITY \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1868837300.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN FUND \"9\" (USD) ACC","LU1894683348.USD":"AMUNDI FUNDS US EQUITY RESEARCH VALUE \"A2\" (USD) INC","LU2237443895.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4588":"碎股","LU2237443465.HKD":"abrdn SICAV I -  GLOBAL DYNAMIC DIVIDEND \"A\" (HKD) INC","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","LU2237443622.USD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc USD","IE0004086264.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (USD) ACC","BK4552":"Archegos爆仓风波概念","AAPL":"苹果","LU2237443978.SGD":"Aberdeen Standard SICAV I - Global Dynamic Dividend A Acc SGD-H","IE00BFXG1179.USD":"BNY MELLON U.S. EQUITY INCOME \"B\" (USD) INC","LU1868836914.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"3\" (USD) ACC","NVDA":"英伟达","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","TSLA":"特斯拉","LU1868837136.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"8\" (USD) ACC","LU1804176565.USD":"EASTSPRING INV GLOBAL GROWTH EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE0004091025.USD":"BNY MELLON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES \"B\" (USD) ACC","IE00B19Z3581.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Value A Acc USD"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181374063","content_text":"Goldman Sachs Asset Management's Sung Cho, Co-Head of Technology Investing and U.S. Fundamental Equity, recently conveyed a reassuring message during a discussion with Scott Wapner: the widespread anxiety over AI financing—often triggered by volatile valuations and perceived fragility—is largely exaggerated. The conversation explored the trajectory of AI investments, broader market prospects, and the underlying stability of the sector's capital structure, offering nuanced insights for founders, venture capitalists, and industry professionals navigating this transformative era.\nCho challenged the narrative of an impending AI bubble by analyzing the capital sources fueling the current boom. He emphasized that most AI investments are not reliant on speculative debt but are instead backed by robust internal cash flows from established tech giants. This distinction is critical in understanding the long-term resilience of the AI market.\nQuantifying the massive capital inflows into AI, Cho stated, \"Considering the total expenditure required over the next few years, we estimate it to be between $700 billion and $1 trillion. What should ease concerns is that 90% of this is funded by operating cash flows.\" This heavy reliance on internal capital—rather than external debt—highlights a fundamental strength in AI investment, differentiating it from past tech speculation cycles.\nThe implications are significant: companies are financing their AI ambitions from a position of financial health rather than leveraging themselves into precarious positions. Moreover, even the smaller portion of AI investments funded through debt remains stable. Cho noted that a substantial share of this debt is issued by high-rated entities, explaining, \"Only about 10% is debt-funded—and much of that is issued by Meta, whose credit rating surpasses even the U.S. government, with bond spreads tighter than Treasuries.\" This indicates that AI-related debt financing is concentrated in highly creditworthy firms, not speculative enterprises with shaky balance sheets, further mitigating systemic risk.\nAddressing concerns about specific companies like Coreweave (CRWV.US) and Oracle (ORCL.US), which have faced recent market turbulence, Cho clarified that these cases do not reflect weakening AI demand. Instead, they stem from operational challenges or supply chain bottlenecks. \"By 2026, funding won’t be the issue,\" he said. \"For Coreweave and Oracle, the problem isn’t demand—it’s supply chain backlogs.\" This distinction is crucial for investors, as it suggests company-specific setbacks are temporary and solvable rather than indicators of broader industry decline.\nCho’s second key insight revolves around the dynamic and inherently volatile nature of leadership in foundational AI models. Rapid shifts in perceived frontrunners define this emerging market—today’s leader could be overtaken tomorrow. He highlighted the swift changes in investor sentiment and market valuations among top AI players, observing, \"Look at how perceptions shifted in 2025 alone: early in the year, Meta was seen as the dominant model; six months later, OpenAI took the lead; and recently, Google has surged ahead in investors’ eyes.\"\nThis competitive fluidity, while generating notable stock volatility, reflects fierce innovation battles rather than systemic market weakness. The financial impact is staggering—for instance, Google’s $1 trillion market cap surge over three months was directly tied to its perceived technological edge with Gemini. Such rapid reallocations of investor confidence underscore how leadership perceptions can reshape valuations overnight.\nThe dynamic environment will persist, with upcoming advancements—like models trained on NVIDIA’s Blackwell architecture in early 2026—likely triggering further volatility and leadership shifts. As innovation accelerates, market participants should expect continuous realignments in perceived dominance.\nUltimately, Cho’s analysis paints a picture of an AI market underpinned by ample capital, primarily sustained through operational cash flows rather than precarious leverage. While competition among leading AI developers will remain intensely volatile, these fluctuations are natural outcomes of rapid innovation, not signs of systemic financial fragility. Though anxieties persist, they appear overstated when examined against the sector’s underlying financial health and demand fundamentals.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159399":1,"XMAG":1,"AMZN":1,"GS":1,"MSFT":1,"GOOG":1,"AAPL":1,"NVDA":1,"TSLA":1,"META":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":396,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/511789762265328"}