Reward 500 Tiger-coins$Seagate Technology PLC(STX)$ released its earnings last night. Goldman Sachs analysts raised their price target from $385 to $700 on the same day — an 82% increase within three hours, with normalized EPS estimates revised from $17.50 to $32.00.
$SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ earnings are about to be released on April 30th.
Seagate beat across the board
Revenue: $3.11B (+44.1% YoY), +5.5% above Street
Gross margin: 47.0%, +230bps vs Street
EPS: $4.10, +16.8% above Street
Q2 revenue guidance (midpoint): $3.45B, +10.3% vs Street
The most critical strategic signal: Management explicitly stated they do not plan to increase capacity. Keeping supply tight = deliberately maintaining pricing power.
Why Seagate’s results directly impact SanDisk’s valuation logic?
HDD and NAND are different technologies, but they share the same demand driver: AI data center capex from hyperscalers
Seagate just told the market: Demand is not just growing — it is already pre-booked into next year
Pricing power can be sustained under intentionally constrained supply
When demand exceeds expectations, cycle-through EPS assumptions can be repriced in a single day (+83%)
SanDisk price target up to $1,250
Morgan Stanley: $1,100 (raised from $690 three weeks ago, +59%) | Bernstein: $1,250 | Current price: ~$990
NAND pricing: 1Q26 actual QoQ +90% (vs guidance +60%); 2Q26E: +70–75% Incremental gross margin: 95.5%
MS valuation anchor: 23x cycle-through EPS $48 = $1,100
Current price is already ~95% of MS base case
From $990 to $1,100 = ~11% upside
What Seagate just changed?
Seagate proved that when supply-demand continues to exceed expectations, 👉 analysts will revise the base assumptions themselves
That makes Morgan Stanley’s $48 cycle-through EPS for SanDisk the key number to reassess post-earnings.
The only missing catalyst: LTA prepayments
Once multi-year contract prepayments appear on the balance sheet: Valuation shifts from “cycle pricing” → “contract visibility pricing”
Morgan Stanley expects this within this year
SK Hynix, Micron, and SanDisk management are all silent — not because nothing is happening, but because negotiations are not finalized yet
Discussion
What is your year-end price target for $SNDK?
Seagate’s normalized EPS jumped from $17.50 → $32.00 in one day — will SanDisk’s $48 cycle EPS be revised higher after earnings?
Will LTA prepayments show up this quarter? 👉 This is the real switch from $1,100 → $1,500.
Comments
That’s why the read-through to $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ matters. Different tech, same demand driver — hyperscaler AI capex. With $1,100 largely priced in, my year-end target is $1,200–$1,300, depending on whether the $48 cycle EPS gets revised higher.
The key catalyst is LTA prepayments. If SanDisk locks in multi-year contracts, valuation can shift toward $1,500. Silence from SK Hynix and $Micron Technology(MU)$ likely reflects ongoing negotiations.
$Roundhill Memory ETF(DRAM)$
$CSOP SK Hynix Daily (2x) Leveraged Product(07709)$
$CSOP Samsung Electronics Daily (2x) Leveraged Product(07747)$
@TigerStars @Tiger_comments @TigerClub @Tiger_SG
Why: • Seagate Technology’s EPS jump from $17.50 to $32 suggests Street models may still be underestimating storage cycle earnings power.
• If SanDisk’s $48 cycle EPS is real, upside revisions toward $55 to $60 are possible on richer enterprise SSD mix and firmer pricing.
• The key is LTA prepayments. If hyperscalers prepay to lock NAND supply, that signals structural tightness, boosts visibility, and supports a re-rating from $1,100 thinking toward $1,500+.
Bottom line:
Beat on earnings = good.
LTA prepayments = narrative shift.
That is the true catalyst.
I expect LTA prepayments to begin appearing in the financials this quarter. These prepayments represent the "real switch" because they provide the balance sheet certainty that long-term investors require to re-rate the stock. Once hyperscalers start locking in supply with upfront cash, the risk of a "cyclical crash" vanishes, providing the fundamental fuel to blast through the "$1,100" resistance toward "$1,500."
Yes, the current "$48" cycle EPS estimate is outdated and will be revised higher. Seagate's jump from "$17.50" to "$32.00" proved that operating leverage in this environment is being underestimated by traditional models. If SanDisk maintains its projected 67% gross margins, the earnings power at the peak of this cycle should be modeled closer to "$55" or "$60," forcing analysts to chase the stock higher post-earnings.
The momentum from Seagate's massive EPS jump confirms that the storage sector is in a structural breakout. Given the current trajectory of the NAND supercycle, a year-end target of "$1,500" is my base case. This valuation reflects a market finally willing to pay a premium for SanDisk’s dominant enterprise position as storage becomes the ultimate bottleneck for AI scaling.
2. Yes, earnings per share or eps is likely to be revised higher
3.yes, Lta prepayments will increase further as spending increases