$Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

$Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$ $Lumentum(LITE)$ $Cohen & Company Inc.(COHN)$ A 6.4T optical engine uses more Indium Phosphide (InP) material than a 3.2T optical engine.

The main reason why 6.4T consumes more InP materials is the increase in total lane count and light source volume required to double the bandwidth from 3.2 Terabits per second to 6.4 Tbps.

First, lane count multiplication is needed. To scale up multi-terabit architectures, optical engines rely on multiplying physical lanes or laser wavelengths. A 6.4T engine requires twice the data-carrying capacity of a 3.2T engine. Even when moving to next-generation individual 400G-per-lane speeds, a 6.4T engine requires 16 channels, while a 3.2T engine only needs 8.

Second, laser component volume increases. Whether the architecture uses discrete InP Electro-absorption Modulated Lasers (EMLs) or continuous-wave (CW) InP lasers arrayed to feed a Silicon Photonics (SiPho) engine, the physical number of laser chips or array sizes must scale up to deliver the necessary optical power and channels.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":576849697211432,"tweetId":"576849697211432","gmtCreate":1781836354000,"gmtModify":1782107327255,"author":{"id":10000000000010952,"idStr":"10000000000010952","authorId":10000000000010952,"authorIdStr":"10000000000010952","name":"Boyd Wild","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cc94732a0a7ba0077246f1b24ce08047","vip":8,"userType":8,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":16,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAOI\">$Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/LITE\">$Lumentum(LITE)$&nbsp;</a><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COHN\">$Cohen &amp; Company Inc.(COHN)$&nbsp;</a>A 6.4T optical engine uses more Indium Phosphide (InP) material than a 3.2T optical engine.</p>\n<p>The main reason why 6.4T consumes more InP materials is the increase in total lane count and light source volume required to double the bandwidth from 3.2 Terabits per second to 6.4 Tbps.</p>\n<p>First, lane count multiplication is needed. To scale up multi-terabit architectures, optical engines rely on multiplying physical lanes or laser wavelengths. A 6.4T engine requires twice the data-carrying capacity of a 3.2T engine. Even when moving to next-generation individual 400G-per-lane speeds, a 6.4T engine requires 16 channels, while a 3.2T engine only needs 8.</p>\n<p>Second, laser component volume increases. Whether the architecture uses discrete InP Electro-absorption Modulated Lasers (EMLs) or continuous-wave (CW) InP lasers arrayed to feed a Silicon Photonics (SiPho) engine, the physical number of laser chips or array sizes must scale up to deliver the necessary optical power and channels.</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAOI\">$Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"1\"></v-v>&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/LITE\">$Lumentum(LITE)$&nbsp;</a><a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/COHN\">$Cohen &amp; Company Inc.(COHN)$&nbsp;</a>A 6.4T optical engine uses more Indium Phosphide (InP) material than a 3.2T optical engine.</p>\n<p>The main reason why 6.4T consumes more InP materials is the increase in total lane count and light source volume required to double the bandwidth from 3.2 Terabits per second to 6.4 Tbps.</p>\n<p>First, lane count multiplication is needed. To scale up multi-terabit architectures, optical engines rely on multiplying physical lanes or laser wavelengths. A 6.4T engine requires twice the data-carrying capacity of a 3.2T engine. Even when moving to next-generation individual 400G-per-lane speeds, a 6.4T engine requires 16 channels, while a 3.2T engine only needs 8.</p>\n<p>Second, laser component volume increases. Whether the architecture uses discrete InP Electro-absorption Modulated Lasers (EMLs) or continuous-wave (CW) InP lasers arrayed to feed a Silicon Photonics (SiPho) engine, the physical number of laser chips or array sizes must scale up to deliver the necessary optical power and channels.</p></body></html>","text":"$Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$ $Lumentum(LITE)$ $Cohen & Company Inc.(COHN)$ A 6.4T optical engine uses more Indium Phosphide (InP) material than a 3.2T optical engine. The main reason why 6.4T consumes more InP materials is the increase in total lane count and light source volume required to double the bandwidth from 3.2 Terabits per second to 6.4 Tbps. First, lane count multiplication is needed. To scale up multi-terabit architectures, optical engines rely on multiplying physical lanes or laser wavelengths. A 6.4T engine requires twice the data-carrying capacity of a 3.2T engine. Even when moving to next-generation individual 400G-per-lane speeds, a 6.4T engine requires 16 channels, while a 3.2T engine only needs 8. Second, laser component volume increases. Whether the architecture uses discrete InP Electro-absorption Modulated Lasers (EMLs) or continuous-wave (CW) InP lasers arrayed to feed a Silicon Photonics (SiPho) engine, the physical number of laser chips or array sizes must scale up to deliver the necessary optical power and channels.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/576849697211432","repostId":0,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":280,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["LITE","COHN","AAOI"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":904,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"isCommentEnd":true,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/576849697211432"}