HODL2MOON
09-28 22:38
$Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$  QQQ held firm while yields broke 5% — what that actually tells us?


Friday the Nasdaq 100 rose 0.46% even as the 10-year yield pushed above 5%. That is not normal behaviour.

In past cycles, yields at these levels usually pressure growth stocks hard. This time the AI heavyweights inside QQQ simply refused to break. Earnings power is still carrying the index.

Monday pre-market looks softer. Dow futures are down and oil is reacting to fresh geopolitical comments. That is the market doing its usual risk check.

The real question is simple:

Is this resilience because the biggest companies can still grow earnings in a higher-rate world?
Or is it just the calm before rates finally force a bigger re-pricing?

I lean toward the first for now. The companies driving QQQ have real cash flow and pricing power. That buys them time that weaker names do not get.

But history is clear — 5%+ yields eventually test every valuation. The test just has not arrived yet.

Watch two things this week:

1 Whether yields stay above 5%

2 Whether the AI leaders keep holding up on any market weakness

That will tell us if this is true conviction or just delayed pressure.

How are you treating QQQ here — still holding, trimming, or waiting for a clearer break?


QQQ Drops 1%+ — Can Elevated Yields Break the Tech Bull?
The Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed down 1.07% Monday, with the S&P 500 and Dow Jones also retreating as elevated Treasury yields remained the primary headwind for growth stocks; investors shrugged off news of Trump easing Iran sanctions. Session rotation was pronounced — high-beta sectors led by semiconductors bore the brunt as funds locked in tech gains. With yields and the AI thesis in direct conflict, is this tech pullback a healthy rotation — or the first crack in a mid-cycle bull market?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment