HODL2MOON
09-28 23:46

Meta Muse Takes a Cut — Who Gets Squeezed? $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$  

Meta is quietly testing a very different AI business model: take a small fee when Muse completes a transaction for you.

That changes the competitive map.

At Meta Connect, Zuckerberg said Meta expects Muse to generate revenue from transaction fees, rather than relying only on subscriptions or advertising. Muse is already being connected to services such as Expedia and Instacart, allowing the AI agent to handle tasks like travel booking and grocery shopping. (Trending Topics)

The interesting question is: who loses control when AI becomes the checkout layer?

1. Alphabet: potential pressure on the search front door

Google’s traditional advantage is being the starting point for discovery.

But if users increasingly ask an AI agent:

“Find me the cheapest flight and book it.”

the search-results page becomes less important.

That doesn’t mean Google’s search business is immediately threatened. But agentic AI could shift value from search → recommendation → website toward AI agent → transaction.

That is the strategic risk for Alphabet.

2. Expedia: different kind of risk

Expedia is already joining Muse as a connector, so this isn’t necessarily a direct attack on its business.

The bigger question is customer ownership.

If Muse increasingly becomes the place where users decide where to travel and then Expedia simply fulfils the booking, Meta could gain a valuable position between the consumer and the travel platform.

Expedia still gets the transaction — but Meta potentially gets a cut for bringing it there.

3. Amazon: the clearest example of the conflict

Amazon has already blocked Muse from shopping on Amazon.com, arguing that Meta’s agent was accessing its store without authorization. (GeekWire)

That tells us something important.

The battle isn’t only about AI capability.

It’s about who controls the customer relationship and checkout.

The bigger investment takeaway

Meta may be trying to turn Muse from an AI assistant into a transaction layer.

If successful, Meta could eventually monetize activities that previously generated little or no direct revenue for it.

But there is an obvious obstacle: the merchants and platforms still control their own ecosystems.

Amazon’s refusal shows that major platforms may not willingly hand over the checkout relationship — or a portion of their economics — to another company’s AI agent.

So the real question isn’t simply “Can Muse book the transaction?”

It’s:

Can Meta convince enough businesses to let Muse become the new front door to commerce?

That’s where the next phase of the AI platform battle could get interesting.

Muse Takes a Cut Per Transaction — Whose Entry Point Does It Touch?
Meta Connect opened Wednesday with $1,299 VR glasses, camera-free smart glasses, and a way to monetize AI assistant Muse: a fee on every transaction it books, size undisclosed. Meta rose 1.02% to $744.10 as all three indexes fell. The fee only works if Muse books the flight or fills the cart instead of the user — Expedia, Instacart and Amazon sit in that path. Alphabet fell 3.58% to $334.98, over triple the Nasdaq's drop, since search and checkout are its front door; Apple slipped 0.80% to $337.02, the VR glasses aimed at its turf. Expedia, Amazon or Alphabet — who feels it first?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment