nailclipper personal page - To The Moon

nailclipper

nailclipper

No personal profile

3Follow

2Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-07-24

$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$gg

2021-06-30

bullish

2021-06-30

$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$wiw

2021-06-29

https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&Page=Me&lang=en_US&skin=1&edition=fundamental&invite=K86S6V

Changes in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore

2021-06-29

wa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

wa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

wa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

wa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

waah

Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.

2021-06-29

woah

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

moo

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-29

waaa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-28

woawlawoa

Bitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7

2021-06-28

owowowowwo

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-28

woawwwaaaa

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-28

niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-06-28

wa

It Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse

2021-06-28

wa

All 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3583800505467680","uuid":"3583800505467680","gmtCreate":1620706611201,"gmtModify":1624847373803,"name":"nailclipper","pinyin":"nailclipper","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":2,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":18,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.06.20","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":174641708,"gmtCreate":1627097454104,"gmtModify":1703484221912,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>gg","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>gg","text":"$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$gg","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c94098dca042253950fa7972fcb17a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174641708","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1993,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151087291,"gmtCreate":1625058134813,"gmtModify":1703735019086,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"bullish","listText":"bullish","text":"bullish","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4b4a548c1b0231df82220d7e791baf8","width":"1080","height":"2872"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151087291","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151084700,"gmtCreate":1625058107400,"gmtModify":1703735017934,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>wiw","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>wiw","text":"$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$wiw","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/087a0f7bbf32e98d3a18b6db4d99e19b","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151084700","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159924855,"gmtCreate":1624937433977,"gmtModify":1703848378187,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&amp;Page=Me&amp;lang=en_US&amp;skin=1&amp;edition=fundamental&amp;invite=K86S6V","listText":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&amp;Page=Me&amp;lang=en_US&amp;skin=1&amp;edition=fundamental&amp;invite=K86S6V","text":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&Page=Me&lang=en_US&skin=1&edition=fundamental&invite=K86S6V","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159924855","repostId":"1101350966","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101350966","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624862779,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101350966?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 14:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Changes in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101350966","media":"Barrons","summary":"The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value,","content":"<p>The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event.</p>\n<p>If they take interest, it is mainly to see which stocks may gain or lose in terms of cash flows because they were added or dropped from a particular index. (This year&nbsp;GameStop&nbsp;is graduating&nbsp;to the large-cap Russell 1000 index, but&nbsp;AMC&nbsp;isn’t, for example).</p>\n<p>But for financial advisors who spend time on portfolio construction and need to benchmark their asset allocation decisions using these indexes, this year’s reconstitution could be a game changer. That’s mainly because market caps have grown so significantly in the past year.</p>\n<p>In fact, all advisors, even those who use model portfolios, should make sure they are conversant in these seismic market shifts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>The total U.S. stock market is much bigger.</b>If you used $30 trillion as a rounding number, you’re now off by almost $20 trillion. According to Russell, the total U.S. equity market capitalization increased by 52% to nearly $48 trillion, as of May 2021. That’s up from $31 trillion in 2020.</li>\n <li><b>Large cap stocks are much larger (so are small-cap stocks).</b>If you think $1 billion in market cap makes a large-cap, you’re off by a few billion. As of this year, the market cap breakpoint separating the small-caps in the Russell 2000 Index and the large-caps in the Russell 1000 Index increased to $5.2 billion. That’s up from $3.0 billion in 2020—a massive 73% jump. Another sign of the times: The smallest company in the index is&nbsp;Velocity Financial&nbsp;with a market cap of $257 million. Last year’s smallest, Limestone Bancorp, had a market cap of $95 million.</li>\n <li><b>Even megacap stocks are bigger than you might think.</b>$200 billion in market cap doesn’t really constitute a megacap anymore. There are now four companies with more than a $1 trillion market cap. This year&nbsp;Alphabet&nbsp;joined&nbsp;Microsoft,Apple&nbsp;and&nbsp;Amazon,which reached the trillion mark in 2020.</li>\n <li><b>Yes, value really is outperforming growth.</b>But it’s more pronounced among smaller companies, according to Russell. The 2000 Value Index returned 79% compared to 50% for the Russell 2000 Growth through May. Looking just at large caps, the Russell 1000 Value had a total return of 44% versus the Russell 1000 Growth at 40%.</li>\n <li><b>Sectors are shifting.</b>For the large-cap Russell 1000, the sector shifts are relatively minor. Technology and consumer discretionary weights increased modestly. For the Russell 2000 Index, the most notable increase is in health care, while consumer discretionary decreased. Of the 43 IPOs added to the Russell 3000, about half are health care companies.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Advisors who invest using passive index investing products (direct indexing is growing&nbsp;in popularity) should note changes to the index composition, as well as advisors who use indexes to benchmark success of active managers.</p>\n<p>“You need to make sure indexes are truly representative” of market segments, says Hilary Keitel, head of U.S. Wealth for FTSE Russell. “This allows financial advisors to fulfill a more precise asset allocation.”</p>\n<p>Russell spreads out the reconstitution over a month so broad market impact is limited. The first official Russell index lists were announced June 4. Indexes are scheduled for their 2021 reconstitution after the market closes on June 25. All additions and deletions are on the&nbsp;FTSE Russell website.</p>\n<p>Changes will impact more than $10.6 trillion in investor assets. “We anticipate this to be one of the largest trading days of the year in the U.S. markets,” says Catherine Yoshimoto, director of product management at FTSE Russell. “ETF product issuers keep a close eye on this,” she says. They aren’t the only ones.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Changes in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChanges in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-28 14:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101350966","content_text":"The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event.\nIf they take interest, it is mainly to see which stocks may gain or lose in terms of cash flows because they were added or dropped from a particular index. (This year GameStop is graduating to the large-cap Russell 1000 index, but AMC isn’t, for example).\nBut for financial advisors who spend time on portfolio construction and need to benchmark their asset allocation decisions using these indexes, this year’s reconstitution could be a game changer. That’s mainly because market caps have grown so significantly in the past year.\nIn fact, all advisors, even those who use model portfolios, should make sure they are conversant in these seismic market shifts:\n\nThe total U.S. stock market is much bigger.If you used $30 trillion as a rounding number, you’re now off by almost $20 trillion. According to Russell, the total U.S. equity market capitalization increased by 52% to nearly $48 trillion, as of May 2021. That’s up from $31 trillion in 2020.\nLarge cap stocks are much larger (so are small-cap stocks).If you think $1 billion in market cap makes a large-cap, you’re off by a few billion. As of this year, the market cap breakpoint separating the small-caps in the Russell 2000 Index and the large-caps in the Russell 1000 Index increased to $5.2 billion. That’s up from $3.0 billion in 2020—a massive 73% jump. Another sign of the times: The smallest company in the index is Velocity Financial with a market cap of $257 million. Last year’s smallest, Limestone Bancorp, had a market cap of $95 million.\nEven megacap stocks are bigger than you might think.$200 billion in market cap doesn’t really constitute a megacap anymore. There are now four companies with more than a $1 trillion market cap. This year Alphabet joined Microsoft,Apple and Amazon,which reached the trillion mark in 2020.\nYes, value really is outperforming growth.But it’s more pronounced among smaller companies, according to Russell. The 2000 Value Index returned 79% compared to 50% for the Russell 2000 Growth through May. Looking just at large caps, the Russell 1000 Value had a total return of 44% versus the Russell 1000 Growth at 40%.\nSectors are shifting.For the large-cap Russell 1000, the sector shifts are relatively minor. Technology and consumer discretionary weights increased modestly. For the Russell 2000 Index, the most notable increase is in health care, while consumer discretionary decreased. Of the 43 IPOs added to the Russell 3000, about half are health care companies.\n\nAdvisors who invest using passive index investing products (direct indexing is growing in popularity) should note changes to the index composition, as well as advisors who use indexes to benchmark success of active managers.\n“You need to make sure indexes are truly representative” of market segments, says Hilary Keitel, head of U.S. Wealth for FTSE Russell. “This allows financial advisors to fulfill a more precise asset allocation.”\nRussell spreads out the reconstitution over a month so broad market impact is limited. The first official Russell index lists were announced June 4. Indexes are scheduled for their 2021 reconstitution after the market closes on June 25. All additions and deletions are on the FTSE Russell website.\nChanges will impact more than $10.6 trillion in investor assets. “We anticipate this to be one of the largest trading days of the year in the U.S. markets,” says Catherine Yoshimoto, director of product management at FTSE Russell. “ETF product issuers keep a close eye on this,” she says. They aren’t the only ones.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"RTYmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159928987,"gmtCreate":1624937167049,"gmtModify":1703848372948,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159928987","repostId":"2146900754","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2722,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159928058,"gmtCreate":1624937150274,"gmtModify":1703848372624,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159928058","repostId":"1164912248","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159921680,"gmtCreate":1624937136140,"gmtModify":1703848371815,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159921680","repostId":"2146877158","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159921037,"gmtCreate":1624937122629,"gmtModify":1703848370839,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159921037","repostId":"2146983887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159923558,"gmtCreate":1624937111474,"gmtModify":1703848370678,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"waah","listText":"waah","text":"waah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159923558","repostId":"1148481357","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148481357","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624888651,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1148481357?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148481357","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath & Beyond climbed be","content":"<p>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb2694f87fdac29278fbf2a583a1bf36\" tg-width=\"390\" tg-height=\"743\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMeme stocks are blazing hot, once again.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-28 21:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb2694f87fdac29278fbf2a583a1bf36\" tg-width=\"390\" tg-height=\"743\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BBBY":"Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.","GME":"游戏驿站","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148481357","content_text":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath & Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9,"BBBY":0.9,"GME":0.9,"CCIV":0.9,"WKHS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1981,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159929542,"gmtCreate":1624937039786,"gmtModify":1703848368893,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woah","listText":"woah","text":"woah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159929542","repostId":"1124906464","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2833,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159916868,"gmtCreate":1624935467154,"gmtModify":1703848331650,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"moo","listText":"moo","text":"moo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159916868","repostId":"2146025230","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159910544,"gmtCreate":1624935184388,"gmtModify":1703848325817,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"waaa","listText":"waaa","text":"waaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159910544","repostId":"2147837316","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":486,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127654142,"gmtCreate":1624847625586,"gmtModify":1703846095757,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woawlawoa","listText":"woawlawoa","text":"woawlawoa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127654142","repostId":"2146021046","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2146021046","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1624589404,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2146021046?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 10:50","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Bitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2146021046","media":"Reuters","summary":"SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on","content":"<p>SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.</p>\n<p>El Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.</p>\n<p>\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.</p>\n<p>Salaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.</p>\n<p>Earlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.</p>\n<p>According to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-25 10:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.</p>\n<p>El Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.</p>\n<p>\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.</p>\n<p>Salaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.</p>\n<p>Earlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.</p>\n<p>According to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2146021046","content_text":"SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.\nEl Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.\n\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.\nSalaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.\nEarlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.\nAccording to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GBTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":546,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127655016,"gmtCreate":1624847562935,"gmtModify":1703846094115,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"owowowowwo","listText":"owowowowwo","text":"owowowowwo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127655016","repostId":"1104882070","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127666628,"gmtCreate":1624846600864,"gmtModify":1703846063045,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woawwwaaaa","listText":"woawwwaaaa","text":"woawwwaaaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127666628","repostId":"1180366049","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127666052,"gmtCreate":1624846580576,"gmtModify":1703846062212,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","listText":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","text":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127666052","repostId":"2146567027","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127668806,"gmtCreate":1624846550105,"gmtModify":1703846061884,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127668806","repostId":"1192734381","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192734381","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624607687,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192734381?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 15:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192734381","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.","content":"<blockquote>\n <i>Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/901d35cf67cdca7a9c9da3d17ddb2d83\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p><b>One of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of Mike Tyson:&nbsp;</b><b><i>\"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.\"</i></b>&nbsp;At this moment in history, the plan of most market participants is to place their full faith and trust in the status quo's ability to keep asset prices lofting ever higher, essentially forever.</p>\n<p><b>In other words, the vast majority of punters are convinced they will never suffer the indignity of getting punched in the mouth by a market crash.</b>&nbsp;What makes this confidence so interesting is&nbsp;<b>massively distorted markets always end the same way: crisis, crash and collapse.</b></p>\n<p><b>The core dynamic here is distorted markets provide false feedback and misleading information which then lead to participants making catastrophically misguided decisions.</b>&nbsp;Investment decisions made on poor information will also be poor, leading participants to end up poor, to their very great surprise.</p>\n<p><b>The surprise comes from the falsity of the feedback, as those who are distorting markets want punters to believe \"the market\" is functioning transparently.</b>&nbsp;If you're manipulating the market, the last thing you want is for the unwary marks to discover that the market is generating false signals and misleading information on risk, as&nbsp;<i>knowing the market is being distorted would alert them to the extraordinary risks intrinsic to heavily distorted markets.</i></p>\n<p><b>The risks arise from the disconnect between the precariousness of the manipulated market and the extreme confidence punters have in its stability and predictability.</b>&nbsp;The predictability comes not from transparent feedback and market signals but from the manipulation. This stability is entirely fabricated and therefore it lacks the&nbsp;<i>dynamic stability of truly open markets.</i></p>\n<p>Markets that are being distorted/manipulated to achieve a goal that is impossible in truly open markets--for example, markets that only loft higher with near-zero volatility--lull participants into a dangerous perception that because markets are so stable, risk has dissipated.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e420e77dbab689d93ea0a8d481793dd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"430\"></p>\n<p><b>In actuality, risk is skyrocketing beneath the surface of the artificial stability because the market has been stripped of the mechanisms of&nbsp;</b><b><i>dynamic stability</i></b><b>.</b>&nbsp;This artificial stability derived from sustained manipulation has the superficial appearance of low-risk markets, i.e., low levels of volatility, but this lack of volatility derives not from transparency but from behind-the-scenes suppression of volatility.</p>\n<p><b>Another source of risk in distorted markets is the&nbsp;</b><b><i>illusion of liquidity</i></b><b>:</b>&nbsp;in low-volume markets of suppressed volatility, participants are encouraged to believe that they can buy and sell whatever securities they want in whatever volumes they want without disturbing market pricing and liquidity. In other words, participants are led to believe that the market will always have a bid due to the near-infinite depth of liquidity: no matter how many billions of dollars of securities you want to sell, there will always be a bid for your shares.</p>\n<p><b>In actual fact, the bid is paper-thin and it vanishes altogether once selling rises above very low levels.</b>&nbsp;Heavily manipulated markets are exquisitely sensitive to selling because the entire point is to limit any urge to sell while encouraging the greed to increase gains by buying more.</p>\n<p><b>The illusions of low risk, essentially guaranteed gains for those who increase their positions and near-infinite liquidity generate overwhelming incentives to borrow more and leverage it to the hilt to maximize gains.</b>&nbsp;The blissfully delusional punter feels the decision to borrow the maximum available and leverage it to the maximum is entirely rational due to the \"obvious\" absence of risk, the \"obvious\" guaranteed gains offered by markets lofting ever higher like clockwork and the \"obvious\" abundance of liquidity, assuring the punter they can always sell their entire position at today's prices and lock in profits at any time.</p>\n<p><b>On top of all these grossly misleading distortions, punters have been encouraged to believe in the ultimate distortion: the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline again, ever.</b>&nbsp;This is the perfection of&nbsp;<i>moral hazard</i>:&nbsp;<b>risk has been disconnected from consequence.</b></p>\n<p>In this perfection of&nbsp;<i>moral hazard</i>, punters consider it entirely rational to increase extremely risky speculative bets because&nbsp;<b>the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline.</b>&nbsp;Given the abundant evidence behind this assumption, it would be irrational not to ramp up crazy-risky speculative bets to the maximum&nbsp;<b>because losses are now impossible thanks to the Fed's implicit promise to never let markets drop.</b></p>\n<p><b>This is why distorted, manipulated markets always end the same way:</b>&nbsp;first, in an unexpected emergence of risk, which was presumed to be banished; second, a market crash as the paper-thin bid disappears and prices flash-crash to levels that wipe out all those forced to sell by margin calls, and then the collapse of faith in the manipulators (the Fed), collapse of the collateral supporting trillions of dollars in highly leveraged debt and then the collapse of the entire delusion-based financial system.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/db208f6307ade39a0c0f27fcdf7aa080\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"609\"></p>\n<p><b>Gordon Long and I illuminate the many layers of distortion, manipulation and moral hazard in our new video presentation,&nbsp;It Always Ends The Same Way</b>&nbsp;(34:33). Amidst the ruins generated by well-meaning manipulation and distortion, the \"well meaning\" part will leave an extremely long-lasting bitter taste in all those who failed to differentiate between the false signals and distorted information of manipulated markets and the trustworthy transparency of signals arising in truly open markets.</p>\n<p><b>In summary: risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.</b>&nbsp;As I often note here,<i>risk cannot be extinguished, it can only be transferred.</i>&nbsp;By distorting markets to create an illusion of low-risk stability, the Federal Reserve has transferred this fatal supernova of risk to the entire financial system.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-25 15:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.\n\n\nOne of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192734381","content_text":"Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.\n\n\nOne of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of Mike Tyson: \"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.\" At this moment in history, the plan of most market participants is to place their full faith and trust in the status quo's ability to keep asset prices lofting ever higher, essentially forever.\nIn other words, the vast majority of punters are convinced they will never suffer the indignity of getting punched in the mouth by a market crash. What makes this confidence so interesting is massively distorted markets always end the same way: crisis, crash and collapse.\nThe core dynamic here is distorted markets provide false feedback and misleading information which then lead to participants making catastrophically misguided decisions. Investment decisions made on poor information will also be poor, leading participants to end up poor, to their very great surprise.\nThe surprise comes from the falsity of the feedback, as those who are distorting markets want punters to believe \"the market\" is functioning transparently. If you're manipulating the market, the last thing you want is for the unwary marks to discover that the market is generating false signals and misleading information on risk, as knowing the market is being distorted would alert them to the extraordinary risks intrinsic to heavily distorted markets.\nThe risks arise from the disconnect between the precariousness of the manipulated market and the extreme confidence punters have in its stability and predictability. The predictability comes not from transparent feedback and market signals but from the manipulation. This stability is entirely fabricated and therefore it lacks the dynamic stability of truly open markets.\nMarkets that are being distorted/manipulated to achieve a goal that is impossible in truly open markets--for example, markets that only loft higher with near-zero volatility--lull participants into a dangerous perception that because markets are so stable, risk has dissipated.\n\nIn actuality, risk is skyrocketing beneath the surface of the artificial stability because the market has been stripped of the mechanisms of dynamic stability. This artificial stability derived from sustained manipulation has the superficial appearance of low-risk markets, i.e., low levels of volatility, but this lack of volatility derives not from transparency but from behind-the-scenes suppression of volatility.\nAnother source of risk in distorted markets is the illusion of liquidity: in low-volume markets of suppressed volatility, participants are encouraged to believe that they can buy and sell whatever securities they want in whatever volumes they want without disturbing market pricing and liquidity. In other words, participants are led to believe that the market will always have a bid due to the near-infinite depth of liquidity: no matter how many billions of dollars of securities you want to sell, there will always be a bid for your shares.\nIn actual fact, the bid is paper-thin and it vanishes altogether once selling rises above very low levels. Heavily manipulated markets are exquisitely sensitive to selling because the entire point is to limit any urge to sell while encouraging the greed to increase gains by buying more.\nThe illusions of low risk, essentially guaranteed gains for those who increase their positions and near-infinite liquidity generate overwhelming incentives to borrow more and leverage it to the hilt to maximize gains. The blissfully delusional punter feels the decision to borrow the maximum available and leverage it to the maximum is entirely rational due to the \"obvious\" absence of risk, the \"obvious\" guaranteed gains offered by markets lofting ever higher like clockwork and the \"obvious\" abundance of liquidity, assuring the punter they can always sell their entire position at today's prices and lock in profits at any time.\nOn top of all these grossly misleading distortions, punters have been encouraged to believe in the ultimate distortion: the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline again, ever. This is the perfection of moral hazard: risk has been disconnected from consequence.\nIn this perfection of moral hazard, punters consider it entirely rational to increase extremely risky speculative bets because the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline. Given the abundant evidence behind this assumption, it would be irrational not to ramp up crazy-risky speculative bets to the maximum because losses are now impossible thanks to the Fed's implicit promise to never let markets drop.\nThis is why distorted, manipulated markets always end the same way: first, in an unexpected emergence of risk, which was presumed to be banished; second, a market crash as the paper-thin bid disappears and prices flash-crash to levels that wipe out all those forced to sell by margin calls, and then the collapse of faith in the manipulators (the Fed), collapse of the collateral supporting trillions of dollars in highly leveraged debt and then the collapse of the entire delusion-based financial system.\n\nGordon Long and I illuminate the many layers of distortion, manipulation and moral hazard in our new video presentation, It Always Ends The Same Way (34:33). Amidst the ruins generated by well-meaning manipulation and distortion, the \"well meaning\" part will leave an extremely long-lasting bitter taste in all those who failed to differentiate between the false signals and distorted information of manipulated markets and the trustworthy transparency of signals arising in truly open markets.\nIn summary: risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market. As I often note here,risk cannot be extinguished, it can only be transferred. By distorting markets to create an illusion of low-risk stability, the Federal Reserve has transferred this fatal supernova of risk to the entire financial system.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127681816,"gmtCreate":1624846152635,"gmtModify":1703846045743,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127681816","repostId":"1108214079","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108214079","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624607367,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108214079?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 15:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"All 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108214079","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we a","content":"<p>As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve announced that all banks easily clearedtheir annual bill of health, acing their annual stress test which found that banks could suffer almost $500 billion in losses and still comfortably meet capital requirements, setting the scene for hundreds of billions in stock buybacks and dividends.</p>\n<p>The \"test\" showed the country’s biggest banks could withstand $474 billion in losses from loans and other positions, and still emerge with more than double the required high-quality common equity tier one, or CET1, capital relative to their risk-weighted assets.</p>\n<p>In a statement published by the Federal Reserve Board, the Fed said that the results of the annual bank stress test showed that large banks \"continue to have strong capital levels and could continue lending to households and businesses during a severe recession.\"</p>\n<p>\"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve has run three stress tests with several different hypothetical recessions and all have confirmed that the banking system is strongly positioned to support the ongoing recovery,\" said Vice Chair for Supervision Randal K. Quarles.</p>\n<p><b>All 23 large banks tested remained well above their risk-based minimum capital requirements,</b>and as laid out previously by the Board, the additional restrictions put in place during the COVID event will end. As a result, all large banks will be subject to the normal restrictions of the Board's stress capital buffer, or SCB, framework.</p>\n<p>The SCB framework was finalized last year and maintains strong capital requirements in the aggregate for large banks with an increase in requirements for the largest and most complex banks. It sets capital requirements via the stress tests, and as a result, banks are required to hold enough capital to survive a severe recession. If a bank does not stay above its capital requirements, which include the SCB, it is subject to automatic restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.</p>\n<p>Naturally this is great news,<b>and it means that banks no longer need the Fed's $120BN in monthly QE right?</b></p>\n<p>Joking aside, having aced their tests the six largest US banks - a group that also includes Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs - will now pay out approximately $142 billion in capital to shareholders, paving the way for them to double total shareholder payouts in the next four quarters, according to data compiled by Bloomberg based on estimates provided by analysts at Barclays Plc.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c0f4f744baea705298a632057a1089d\" tg-width=\"642\" tg-height=\"339\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>For those wondering just what the Fed \"tested\" for,this year's hypothetical scenarioincludes a \"severe\" global recession with substantial stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>The unemployment rate rises by 4 percentage points to a peak of 10-3/4 percent.</li>\n <li>Gross domestic product falls 4 percent from the fourth quarter of 2020 through the third quarter of 2022.</li>\n <li>And asset prices decline sharply, with a 55 percent decline in equity prices (unclear how many trillions the Fed would have to inject in this scenario to stabilize stonks).</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Under that scenario, the Fed calculated that<b>the 23 large banks would collectively lose more than $470 billion, with nearly $160 billion losses from commercial real estate and corporate loans.</b></p>\n<p>Of banks headquartered in the US, investment banking groups Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley suffered the biggest hits to their capital ratios in the stress tests, with declines of 5.9 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively. This compared to an average decline of 2.4% points for the 23 banks that underwent the tests, which included the American subsidiaries of foreign banks with significant US operations.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cf2f5302333e2e68ae4bf1a48962627\" tg-width=\"819\" tg-height=\"620\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Even in a worst case scenario capital ratios would decline to only 10.6%, still more than double their minimum requirements.</p>\n<p>Consumer debt accounted for a smaller portion of overall losses than previous years since most retail customers spent the past year paying down credit cards and other loans during the Covid-19 pandemic. But an increase in expected losses in commercial and industrial loans more than offset that decline. Nearly $160bn of the losses came from commercial real estate and corporate loans.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/602b5d94c01e097ef93f83f6b70ade10\" tg-width=\"956\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>A summary of how the various bank capital ratios would be impact under the Fed's stress scenarios is shown below.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8a6aa543d4ad0e3d044e4397a77ad2c\" tg-width=\"973\" tg-height=\"961\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The Fed also said that, as expected, it would lift pandemic restrictions on bank share buybacks and dividends on June 30th after banks clear stress tests.</p>\n<p>The next step is on Monday, June 28: the Fed expects banks to wait until then to analyze the results of the stress tests before announcing any plans for new shareholder payouts, according to senior Fed officials. Then, after the market close, banks can unveil their capital distribution plans. From the tests, the Fed will also prescribe for each bank how much CET1 capital in excess of regulatory minimums they need to keep through a so-called stress capital buffer. The CET1 ratio measured against risk-weighted assets is a crucial benchmark of financial stability.</p>\n<p>Barclays analysts estimate the median bank out of the 20 relevant institutions it covers will return over 100 per cent of its earnings to shareholders over the next year, with capital returned to investors approaching $200bn.</p>\n<p>In immediate response, the market - which knew the outcome of the test well in advance - bid up bank stocks which rose in postmarket trading, with Bank of America leading the rally among big banks, rising 1.6%; Morgan Stanley +1%, Citigroup +0.9% and Wells Fargo +0.8%, JPMorgan +0.7%, Goldman Sachs +0.6%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f1c7c394ce7aae8679dfe85b5e987060\" tg-width=\"512\" tg-height=\"335\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a670e03c93a58825a2398a12f3756c6b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>And while all of the above was exactly as expected, overnight Credit Suisse repo guru Zoltan Poszar warned of a potentially troubling twist.</p>\n<p>In his latest Global Money Dispatch, Pozsar notes that among other things, today's stress test results will determine the stress capital buffers (SCB) large banks will have to hold in 2022, which will affect their CET1 minimums. Naturally,<b>lower SCBs allow the largest U.S. banks to run with higher G-SIB surcharges, and this trade-off is particularly important for J.P. Morgan.</b>According to Pozsar,&nbsp; the bank will be more willing to let its G-SIB surcharge climb to 5% this year from 4% last year if its SCB comes in around 2.5%, down from 3.3% currently. As a result, today's release may have \"<i>a big impact on the pricing of the year-end turn in FX swaps: if J.P. Morgan’s SCB drops a lot, year-end premia might shrink a lot from here.\"</i></p>\n<p>There's more: looking ahead to the June 30 expiration of stock buyback limitations, the Hungarian repo guru writes that<b>the upcoming wave of buybacks \"destroy balance sheet capacity in the banking system\" as banks that return capital to shareholders have less capital to leverage up.</b></p>\n<p>Here's the math:<i>with a 5% Supplemental Liquidity Ratio minimum at the holdco level,</i><i><b>banks run 20-times leverage, which means that $10 billion in stock buybacks means $200 billion less of banks’ demand for reserves, Treasuries, MBS, and deposits.</b></i></p>\n<p>This means that as banks rush to handout cash to shareholders, they will be forced to park even more reserves elsewhere... like for example the Fed's reverse repo facility. This “push” by banks to shed capacity and potentially some deposits will meet the “sucking sound” of the RRP facility in coming weeks. It comes as usage of the Fed's reverse repo facility has been rising by tens of billions daily and on Wednesday just hit a record $813.6 billion.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/391bdb2316b81ed40abaf3e0280d35a1\" tg-width=\"1170\" tg-height=\"628\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Now imagine what will happen to the RRP facility if banks indeed proceed to repurchase $142BN in stock; applying Pozsar's 20x leverage multiple, this means that bank balance sheets will shrink by just under $3 trillion, including trillions in reserves which will have to be parked at the Fed, which also means that in the coming weeks usage on the Fed's reserve facility is set to explode to unprecedented levels. This in turn will only accelerate the next funding crisis (now that the banking system has shifted from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market) thanks to the Fed's IOER/RRP rate hike), as we described in \"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis.\"</p>\n<p>One final technical consideration from Zoltan is that the flattening of the yield curve in recent days hit bank stocks,<b>so banks may start buybacks on July 1st, which means banks might choose to stay liquid around quarter-end.</b>This will be an extra factor to consider in pricing the June quarter-end turn.</p>\n<p>As Pozsar concludes,<b>\"ample liquidity is ample only if banks are willing to trade it, and trading liquidity means giving it up, which large banks might not want to do when the “pull” of the o/n RRP facility can complicate re-starting buybacks as early as July 1st.</b>\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>All 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAll 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-25 15:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利","WFC":"富国银行","BAC":"美国银行","KBE":"银行指数ETF-SPDR KBW","GS":"高盛","C":"花旗","JPM":"摩根大通"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108214079","content_text":"As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve announced that all banks easily clearedtheir annual bill of health, acing their annual stress test which found that banks could suffer almost $500 billion in losses and still comfortably meet capital requirements, setting the scene for hundreds of billions in stock buybacks and dividends.\nThe \"test\" showed the country’s biggest banks could withstand $474 billion in losses from loans and other positions, and still emerge with more than double the required high-quality common equity tier one, or CET1, capital relative to their risk-weighted assets.\nIn a statement published by the Federal Reserve Board, the Fed said that the results of the annual bank stress test showed that large banks \"continue to have strong capital levels and could continue lending to households and businesses during a severe recession.\"\n\"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve has run three stress tests with several different hypothetical recessions and all have confirmed that the banking system is strongly positioned to support the ongoing recovery,\" said Vice Chair for Supervision Randal K. Quarles.\nAll 23 large banks tested remained well above their risk-based minimum capital requirements,and as laid out previously by the Board, the additional restrictions put in place during the COVID event will end. As a result, all large banks will be subject to the normal restrictions of the Board's stress capital buffer, or SCB, framework.\nThe SCB framework was finalized last year and maintains strong capital requirements in the aggregate for large banks with an increase in requirements for the largest and most complex banks. It sets capital requirements via the stress tests, and as a result, banks are required to hold enough capital to survive a severe recession. If a bank does not stay above its capital requirements, which include the SCB, it is subject to automatic restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.\nNaturally this is great news,and it means that banks no longer need the Fed's $120BN in monthly QE right?\nJoking aside, having aced their tests the six largest US banks - a group that also includes Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs - will now pay out approximately $142 billion in capital to shareholders, paving the way for them to double total shareholder payouts in the next four quarters, according to data compiled by Bloomberg based on estimates provided by analysts at Barclays Plc.\n\nFor those wondering just what the Fed \"tested\" for,this year's hypothetical scenarioincludes a \"severe\" global recession with substantial stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets:\n\nThe unemployment rate rises by 4 percentage points to a peak of 10-3/4 percent.\nGross domestic product falls 4 percent from the fourth quarter of 2020 through the third quarter of 2022.\nAnd asset prices decline sharply, with a 55 percent decline in equity prices (unclear how many trillions the Fed would have to inject in this scenario to stabilize stonks).\n\nUnder that scenario, the Fed calculated thatthe 23 large banks would collectively lose more than $470 billion, with nearly $160 billion losses from commercial real estate and corporate loans.\nOf banks headquartered in the US, investment banking groups Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley suffered the biggest hits to their capital ratios in the stress tests, with declines of 5.9 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively. This compared to an average decline of 2.4% points for the 23 banks that underwent the tests, which included the American subsidiaries of foreign banks with significant US operations.\n\nEven in a worst case scenario capital ratios would decline to only 10.6%, still more than double their minimum requirements.\nConsumer debt accounted for a smaller portion of overall losses than previous years since most retail customers spent the past year paying down credit cards and other loans during the Covid-19 pandemic. But an increase in expected losses in commercial and industrial loans more than offset that decline. Nearly $160bn of the losses came from commercial real estate and corporate loans.\n\nA summary of how the various bank capital ratios would be impact under the Fed's stress scenarios is shown below.\n\nThe Fed also said that, as expected, it would lift pandemic restrictions on bank share buybacks and dividends on June 30th after banks clear stress tests.\nThe next step is on Monday, June 28: the Fed expects banks to wait until then to analyze the results of the stress tests before announcing any plans for new shareholder payouts, according to senior Fed officials. Then, after the market close, banks can unveil their capital distribution plans. From the tests, the Fed will also prescribe for each bank how much CET1 capital in excess of regulatory minimums they need to keep through a so-called stress capital buffer. The CET1 ratio measured against risk-weighted assets is a crucial benchmark of financial stability.\nBarclays analysts estimate the median bank out of the 20 relevant institutions it covers will return over 100 per cent of its earnings to shareholders over the next year, with capital returned to investors approaching $200bn.\nIn immediate response, the market - which knew the outcome of the test well in advance - bid up bank stocks which rose in postmarket trading, with Bank of America leading the rally among big banks, rising 1.6%; Morgan Stanley +1%, Citigroup +0.9% and Wells Fargo +0.8%, JPMorgan +0.7%, Goldman Sachs +0.6%.\n\n* * *\nAnd while all of the above was exactly as expected, overnight Credit Suisse repo guru Zoltan Poszar warned of a potentially troubling twist.\nIn his latest Global Money Dispatch, Pozsar notes that among other things, today's stress test results will determine the stress capital buffers (SCB) large banks will have to hold in 2022, which will affect their CET1 minimums. Naturally,lower SCBs allow the largest U.S. banks to run with higher G-SIB surcharges, and this trade-off is particularly important for J.P. Morgan.According to Pozsar,  the bank will be more willing to let its G-SIB surcharge climb to 5% this year from 4% last year if its SCB comes in around 2.5%, down from 3.3% currently. As a result, today's release may have \"a big impact on the pricing of the year-end turn in FX swaps: if J.P. Morgan’s SCB drops a lot, year-end premia might shrink a lot from here.\"\nThere's more: looking ahead to the June 30 expiration of stock buyback limitations, the Hungarian repo guru writes thatthe upcoming wave of buybacks \"destroy balance sheet capacity in the banking system\" as banks that return capital to shareholders have less capital to leverage up.\nHere's the math:with a 5% Supplemental Liquidity Ratio minimum at the holdco level,banks run 20-times leverage, which means that $10 billion in stock buybacks means $200 billion less of banks’ demand for reserves, Treasuries, MBS, and deposits.\nThis means that as banks rush to handout cash to shareholders, they will be forced to park even more reserves elsewhere... like for example the Fed's reverse repo facility. This “push” by banks to shed capacity and potentially some deposits will meet the “sucking sound” of the RRP facility in coming weeks. It comes as usage of the Fed's reverse repo facility has been rising by tens of billions daily and on Wednesday just hit a record $813.6 billion.\n\nNow imagine what will happen to the RRP facility if banks indeed proceed to repurchase $142BN in stock; applying Pozsar's 20x leverage multiple, this means that bank balance sheets will shrink by just under $3 trillion, including trillions in reserves which will have to be parked at the Fed, which also means that in the coming weeks usage on the Fed's reserve facility is set to explode to unprecedented levels. This in turn will only accelerate the next funding crisis (now that the banking system has shifted from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market) thanks to the Fed's IOER/RRP rate hike), as we described in \"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis.\"\nOne final technical consideration from Zoltan is that the flattening of the yield curve in recent days hit bank stocks,so banks may start buybacks on July 1st, which means banks might choose to stay liquid around quarter-end.This will be an extra factor to consider in pricing the June quarter-end turn.\nAs Pozsar concludes,\"ample liquidity is ample only if banks are willing to trade it, and trading liquidity means giving it up, which large banks might not want to do when the “pull” of the o/n RRP facility can complicate re-starting buybacks as early as July 1st.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"JPM":0.9,"KBE":0.9,"WFC":0.9,"C":0.9,"GS":0.9,"MS":0.9,"BAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":624,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":159910544,"gmtCreate":1624935184388,"gmtModify":1703848325817,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"waaa","listText":"waaa","text":"waaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159910544","repostId":"2147837316","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":486,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159929542,"gmtCreate":1624937039786,"gmtModify":1703848368893,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woah","listText":"woah","text":"woah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159929542","repostId":"1124906464","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2833,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":174641708,"gmtCreate":1627097454104,"gmtModify":1703484221912,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>gg","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>gg","text":"$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$gg","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11c94098dca042253950fa7972fcb17a","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/174641708","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1993,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151087291,"gmtCreate":1625058134813,"gmtModify":1703735019086,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"bullish","listText":"bullish","text":"bullish","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4b4a548c1b0231df82220d7e791baf8","width":"1080","height":"2872"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151087291","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2203,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151084700,"gmtCreate":1625058107400,"gmtModify":1703735017934,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>wiw","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UEXCF\">$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$</a>wiw","text":"$UEX Corp.(UEXCF)$wiw","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/087a0f7bbf32e98d3a18b6db4d99e19b","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151084700","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2320,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159924855,"gmtCreate":1624937433977,"gmtModify":1703848378187,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&amp;Page=Me&amp;lang=en_US&amp;skin=1&amp;edition=fundamental&amp;invite=K86S6V","listText":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&amp;Page=Me&amp;lang=en_US&amp;skin=1&amp;edition=fundamental&amp;invite=K86S6V","text":"https://www.tigerbrokers.com.sg/activity/market/2021/7th-anniversary/*K86S6V-index.html?feature=Banner&Page=Me&lang=en_US&skin=1&edition=fundamental&invite=K86S6V","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159924855","repostId":"1101350966","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101350966","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624862779,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101350966?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 14:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Changes in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101350966","media":"Barrons","summary":"The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value,","content":"<p>The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event.</p>\n<p>If they take interest, it is mainly to see which stocks may gain or lose in terms of cash flows because they were added or dropped from a particular index. (This year&nbsp;GameStop&nbsp;is graduating&nbsp;to the large-cap Russell 1000 index, but&nbsp;AMC&nbsp;isn’t, for example).</p>\n<p>But for financial advisors who spend time on portfolio construction and need to benchmark their asset allocation decisions using these indexes, this year’s reconstitution could be a game changer. That’s mainly because market caps have grown so significantly in the past year.</p>\n<p>In fact, all advisors, even those who use model portfolios, should make sure they are conversant in these seismic market shifts:</p>\n<ul>\n <li><b>The total U.S. stock market is much bigger.</b>If you used $30 trillion as a rounding number, you’re now off by almost $20 trillion. According to Russell, the total U.S. equity market capitalization increased by 52% to nearly $48 trillion, as of May 2021. That’s up from $31 trillion in 2020.</li>\n <li><b>Large cap stocks are much larger (so are small-cap stocks).</b>If you think $1 billion in market cap makes a large-cap, you’re off by a few billion. As of this year, the market cap breakpoint separating the small-caps in the Russell 2000 Index and the large-caps in the Russell 1000 Index increased to $5.2 billion. That’s up from $3.0 billion in 2020—a massive 73% jump. Another sign of the times: The smallest company in the index is&nbsp;Velocity Financial&nbsp;with a market cap of $257 million. Last year’s smallest, Limestone Bancorp, had a market cap of $95 million.</li>\n <li><b>Even megacap stocks are bigger than you might think.</b>$200 billion in market cap doesn’t really constitute a megacap anymore. There are now four companies with more than a $1 trillion market cap. This year&nbsp;Alphabet&nbsp;joined&nbsp;Microsoft,Apple&nbsp;and&nbsp;Amazon,which reached the trillion mark in 2020.</li>\n <li><b>Yes, value really is outperforming growth.</b>But it’s more pronounced among smaller companies, according to Russell. The 2000 Value Index returned 79% compared to 50% for the Russell 2000 Growth through May. Looking just at large caps, the Russell 1000 Value had a total return of 44% versus the Russell 1000 Growth at 40%.</li>\n <li><b>Sectors are shifting.</b>For the large-cap Russell 1000, the sector shifts are relatively minor. Technology and consumer discretionary weights increased modestly. For the Russell 2000 Index, the most notable increase is in health care, while consumer discretionary decreased. Of the 43 IPOs added to the Russell 3000, about half are health care companies.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Advisors who invest using passive index investing products (direct indexing is growing&nbsp;in popularity) should note changes to the index composition, as well as advisors who use indexes to benchmark success of active managers.</p>\n<p>“You need to make sure indexes are truly representative” of market segments, says Hilary Keitel, head of U.S. Wealth for FTSE Russell. “This allows financial advisors to fulfill a more precise asset allocation.”</p>\n<p>Russell spreads out the reconstitution over a month so broad market impact is limited. The first official Russell index lists were announced June 4. Indexes are scheduled for their 2021 reconstitution after the market closes on June 25. All additions and deletions are on the&nbsp;FTSE Russell website.</p>\n<p>Changes will impact more than $10.6 trillion in investor assets. “We anticipate this to be one of the largest trading days of the year in the U.S. markets,” says Catherine Yoshimoto, director of product management at FTSE Russell. “ETF product issuers keep a close eye on this,” she says. They aren’t the only ones.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Changes in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChanges in This Year’s Russell Index Rebalancing Are Too Big to Ignore\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-28 14:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/changes-in-this-years-russell-index-rebalancing-are-too-big-to-ignore-51624310730?mod=hp_DAY_Theme_1_3","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101350966","content_text":"The set of FTSE Russell indexes—known most for measuring performance of large cap, small cap, value, and growth segments of the market—are rebalanced every year and for most investors it’s a non-event.\nIf they take interest, it is mainly to see which stocks may gain or lose in terms of cash flows because they were added or dropped from a particular index. (This year GameStop is graduating to the large-cap Russell 1000 index, but AMC isn’t, for example).\nBut for financial advisors who spend time on portfolio construction and need to benchmark their asset allocation decisions using these indexes, this year’s reconstitution could be a game changer. That’s mainly because market caps have grown so significantly in the past year.\nIn fact, all advisors, even those who use model portfolios, should make sure they are conversant in these seismic market shifts:\n\nThe total U.S. stock market is much bigger.If you used $30 trillion as a rounding number, you’re now off by almost $20 trillion. According to Russell, the total U.S. equity market capitalization increased by 52% to nearly $48 trillion, as of May 2021. That’s up from $31 trillion in 2020.\nLarge cap stocks are much larger (so are small-cap stocks).If you think $1 billion in market cap makes a large-cap, you’re off by a few billion. As of this year, the market cap breakpoint separating the small-caps in the Russell 2000 Index and the large-caps in the Russell 1000 Index increased to $5.2 billion. That’s up from $3.0 billion in 2020—a massive 73% jump. Another sign of the times: The smallest company in the index is Velocity Financial with a market cap of $257 million. Last year’s smallest, Limestone Bancorp, had a market cap of $95 million.\nEven megacap stocks are bigger than you might think.$200 billion in market cap doesn’t really constitute a megacap anymore. There are now four companies with more than a $1 trillion market cap. This year Alphabet joined Microsoft,Apple and Amazon,which reached the trillion mark in 2020.\nYes, value really is outperforming growth.But it’s more pronounced among smaller companies, according to Russell. The 2000 Value Index returned 79% compared to 50% for the Russell 2000 Growth through May. Looking just at large caps, the Russell 1000 Value had a total return of 44% versus the Russell 1000 Growth at 40%.\nSectors are shifting.For the large-cap Russell 1000, the sector shifts are relatively minor. Technology and consumer discretionary weights increased modestly. For the Russell 2000 Index, the most notable increase is in health care, while consumer discretionary decreased. Of the 43 IPOs added to the Russell 3000, about half are health care companies.\n\nAdvisors who invest using passive index investing products (direct indexing is growing in popularity) should note changes to the index composition, as well as advisors who use indexes to benchmark success of active managers.\n“You need to make sure indexes are truly representative” of market segments, says Hilary Keitel, head of U.S. Wealth for FTSE Russell. “This allows financial advisors to fulfill a more precise asset allocation.”\nRussell spreads out the reconstitution over a month so broad market impact is limited. The first official Russell index lists were announced June 4. Indexes are scheduled for their 2021 reconstitution after the market closes on June 25. All additions and deletions are on the FTSE Russell website.\nChanges will impact more than $10.6 trillion in investor assets. “We anticipate this to be one of the largest trading days of the year in the U.S. markets,” says Catherine Yoshimoto, director of product management at FTSE Russell. “ETF product issuers keep a close eye on this,” she says. They aren’t the only ones.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"RTYmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2208,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159928987,"gmtCreate":1624937167049,"gmtModify":1703848372948,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159928987","repostId":"2146900754","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2722,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159928058,"gmtCreate":1624937150274,"gmtModify":1703848372624,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159928058","repostId":"1164912248","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2424,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159921680,"gmtCreate":1624937136140,"gmtModify":1703848371815,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159921680","repostId":"2146877158","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2241,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159921037,"gmtCreate":1624937122629,"gmtModify":1703848370839,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159921037","repostId":"2146983887","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2268,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159923558,"gmtCreate":1624937111474,"gmtModify":1703848370678,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"waah","listText":"waah","text":"waah","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159923558","repostId":"1148481357","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1148481357","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1624888651,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1148481357?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-28 21:57","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1148481357","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath & Beyond climbed be","content":"<p>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb2694f87fdac29278fbf2a583a1bf36\" tg-width=\"390\" tg-height=\"743\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMeme stocks are blazing hot, once again.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-28 21:57</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath &amp; Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb2694f87fdac29278fbf2a583a1bf36\" tg-width=\"390\" tg-height=\"743\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BBBY":"Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.","GME":"游戏驿站","WKHS":"Workhorse Group, Inc.","AMC":"AMC院线"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1148481357","content_text":"Meme stocks are blazing hot, once again.CCIV,Workhorse,GameStop,AMC and Bed Bath & Beyond climbed between 5% and 7%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMC":0.9,"BBBY":0.9,"GME":0.9,"CCIV":0.9,"WKHS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1981,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":159916868,"gmtCreate":1624935467154,"gmtModify":1703848331650,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"moo","listText":"moo","text":"moo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/159916868","repostId":"2146025230","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127654142,"gmtCreate":1624847625586,"gmtModify":1703846095757,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woawlawoa","listText":"woawlawoa","text":"woawlawoa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127654142","repostId":"2146021046","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2146021046","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1624589404,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2146021046?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 10:50","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Bitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2146021046","media":"Reuters","summary":"SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on","content":"<p>SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.</p>\n<p>El Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.</p>\n<p>\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.</p>\n<p>Salaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.</p>\n<p>Earlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.</p>\n<p>According to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Bitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBitcoin to become legal tender in El Salvador on Sept 7\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-06-25 10:50</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.</p>\n<p>El Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.</p>\n<p>\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.</p>\n<p>Salaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.</p>\n<p>Earlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.</p>\n<p>According to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GBTC":"比特币ETF-Grayscale"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2146021046","content_text":"SAN SALVADOR, June 24 (Reuters) - El Salvador's President Nayib Bukele said in a national address on Thursday that a recently passed law making bitcoin legal tender will take effect on Sept. 7, noting that its use will be optional.\nEl Salvador's Congress on June 9 approved Bukele's proposal to embrace the cryptocurrency, making El Salvador the first country in the world to adopt bitcoin as legal tender.\n\"The use of bitcoin will be optional, nobody will receive bitcoin if they don't want it... If someone receives a payment in bitcoin they can choose to automatically receive it in dollars,\" said Bukele.\nSalaries and pensions will continue to be paid in U.S. dollars, said Bukele, without specifying if that included salaries paid to state workers and private sector employees.\nEarlier in the day Athena Bitcoin said it plans to invest over $1 million to install some 1,500 cryptocurrency ATMs in El Salvador, especially where residents receive remittances from abroad.\nAccording to Athena Bitcoin's website, the ATMs can be used to buy bitcoins or sell them for cash.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"GBTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":546,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127655016,"gmtCreate":1624847562935,"gmtModify":1703846094115,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"owowowowwo","listText":"owowowowwo","text":"owowowowwo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127655016","repostId":"1104882070","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":744,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127666628,"gmtCreate":1624846600864,"gmtModify":1703846063045,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"woawwwaaaa","listText":"woawwwaaaa","text":"woawwwaaaa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127666628","repostId":"1180366049","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":405,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127666052,"gmtCreate":1624846580576,"gmtModify":1703846062212,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","listText":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","text":"niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggytggggggg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127666052","repostId":"2146567027","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":560,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127668806,"gmtCreate":1624846550105,"gmtModify":1703846061884,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127668806","repostId":"1192734381","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1192734381","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624607687,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192734381?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 15:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192734381","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.","content":"<blockquote>\n <i>Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.</i>\n</blockquote>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/901d35cf67cdca7a9c9da3d17ddb2d83\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"456\"></p>\n<p><b>One of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of Mike Tyson:&nbsp;</b><b><i>\"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.\"</i></b>&nbsp;At this moment in history, the plan of most market participants is to place their full faith and trust in the status quo's ability to keep asset prices lofting ever higher, essentially forever.</p>\n<p><b>In other words, the vast majority of punters are convinced they will never suffer the indignity of getting punched in the mouth by a market crash.</b>&nbsp;What makes this confidence so interesting is&nbsp;<b>massively distorted markets always end the same way: crisis, crash and collapse.</b></p>\n<p><b>The core dynamic here is distorted markets provide false feedback and misleading information which then lead to participants making catastrophically misguided decisions.</b>&nbsp;Investment decisions made on poor information will also be poor, leading participants to end up poor, to their very great surprise.</p>\n<p><b>The surprise comes from the falsity of the feedback, as those who are distorting markets want punters to believe \"the market\" is functioning transparently.</b>&nbsp;If you're manipulating the market, the last thing you want is for the unwary marks to discover that the market is generating false signals and misleading information on risk, as&nbsp;<i>knowing the market is being distorted would alert them to the extraordinary risks intrinsic to heavily distorted markets.</i></p>\n<p><b>The risks arise from the disconnect between the precariousness of the manipulated market and the extreme confidence punters have in its stability and predictability.</b>&nbsp;The predictability comes not from transparent feedback and market signals but from the manipulation. This stability is entirely fabricated and therefore it lacks the&nbsp;<i>dynamic stability of truly open markets.</i></p>\n<p>Markets that are being distorted/manipulated to achieve a goal that is impossible in truly open markets--for example, markets that only loft higher with near-zero volatility--lull participants into a dangerous perception that because markets are so stable, risk has dissipated.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e420e77dbab689d93ea0a8d481793dd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"430\"></p>\n<p><b>In actuality, risk is skyrocketing beneath the surface of the artificial stability because the market has been stripped of the mechanisms of&nbsp;</b><b><i>dynamic stability</i></b><b>.</b>&nbsp;This artificial stability derived from sustained manipulation has the superficial appearance of low-risk markets, i.e., low levels of volatility, but this lack of volatility derives not from transparency but from behind-the-scenes suppression of volatility.</p>\n<p><b>Another source of risk in distorted markets is the&nbsp;</b><b><i>illusion of liquidity</i></b><b>:</b>&nbsp;in low-volume markets of suppressed volatility, participants are encouraged to believe that they can buy and sell whatever securities they want in whatever volumes they want without disturbing market pricing and liquidity. In other words, participants are led to believe that the market will always have a bid due to the near-infinite depth of liquidity: no matter how many billions of dollars of securities you want to sell, there will always be a bid for your shares.</p>\n<p><b>In actual fact, the bid is paper-thin and it vanishes altogether once selling rises above very low levels.</b>&nbsp;Heavily manipulated markets are exquisitely sensitive to selling because the entire point is to limit any urge to sell while encouraging the greed to increase gains by buying more.</p>\n<p><b>The illusions of low risk, essentially guaranteed gains for those who increase their positions and near-infinite liquidity generate overwhelming incentives to borrow more and leverage it to the hilt to maximize gains.</b>&nbsp;The blissfully delusional punter feels the decision to borrow the maximum available and leverage it to the maximum is entirely rational due to the \"obvious\" absence of risk, the \"obvious\" guaranteed gains offered by markets lofting ever higher like clockwork and the \"obvious\" abundance of liquidity, assuring the punter they can always sell their entire position at today's prices and lock in profits at any time.</p>\n<p><b>On top of all these grossly misleading distortions, punters have been encouraged to believe in the ultimate distortion: the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline again, ever.</b>&nbsp;This is the perfection of&nbsp;<i>moral hazard</i>:&nbsp;<b>risk has been disconnected from consequence.</b></p>\n<p>In this perfection of&nbsp;<i>moral hazard</i>, punters consider it entirely rational to increase extremely risky speculative bets because&nbsp;<b>the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline.</b>&nbsp;Given the abundant evidence behind this assumption, it would be irrational not to ramp up crazy-risky speculative bets to the maximum&nbsp;<b>because losses are now impossible thanks to the Fed's implicit promise to never let markets drop.</b></p>\n<p><b>This is why distorted, manipulated markets always end the same way:</b>&nbsp;first, in an unexpected emergence of risk, which was presumed to be banished; second, a market crash as the paper-thin bid disappears and prices flash-crash to levels that wipe out all those forced to sell by margin calls, and then the collapse of faith in the manipulators (the Fed), collapse of the collateral supporting trillions of dollars in highly leveraged debt and then the collapse of the entire delusion-based financial system.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/db208f6307ade39a0c0f27fcdf7aa080\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"609\"></p>\n<p><b>Gordon Long and I illuminate the many layers of distortion, manipulation and moral hazard in our new video presentation,&nbsp;It Always Ends The Same Way</b>&nbsp;(34:33). Amidst the ruins generated by well-meaning manipulation and distortion, the \"well meaning\" part will leave an extremely long-lasting bitter taste in all those who failed to differentiate between the false signals and distorted information of manipulated markets and the trustworthy transparency of signals arising in truly open markets.</p>\n<p><b>In summary: risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.</b>&nbsp;As I often note here,<i>risk cannot be extinguished, it can only be transferred.</i>&nbsp;By distorting markets to create an illusion of low-risk stability, the Federal Reserve has transferred this fatal supernova of risk to the entire financial system.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt Always Ends The Same Way: Crisis, Crash, Collapse\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-25 15:54 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.\n\n\nOne of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/it-always-ends-same-way-crisis-crash-collapse","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192734381","content_text":"Risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market.\n\n\nOne of the most under-appreciated investment insights is courtesy of Mike Tyson: \"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.\" At this moment in history, the plan of most market participants is to place their full faith and trust in the status quo's ability to keep asset prices lofting ever higher, essentially forever.\nIn other words, the vast majority of punters are convinced they will never suffer the indignity of getting punched in the mouth by a market crash. What makes this confidence so interesting is massively distorted markets always end the same way: crisis, crash and collapse.\nThe core dynamic here is distorted markets provide false feedback and misleading information which then lead to participants making catastrophically misguided decisions. Investment decisions made on poor information will also be poor, leading participants to end up poor, to their very great surprise.\nThe surprise comes from the falsity of the feedback, as those who are distorting markets want punters to believe \"the market\" is functioning transparently. If you're manipulating the market, the last thing you want is for the unwary marks to discover that the market is generating false signals and misleading information on risk, as knowing the market is being distorted would alert them to the extraordinary risks intrinsic to heavily distorted markets.\nThe risks arise from the disconnect between the precariousness of the manipulated market and the extreme confidence punters have in its stability and predictability. The predictability comes not from transparent feedback and market signals but from the manipulation. This stability is entirely fabricated and therefore it lacks the dynamic stability of truly open markets.\nMarkets that are being distorted/manipulated to achieve a goal that is impossible in truly open markets--for example, markets that only loft higher with near-zero volatility--lull participants into a dangerous perception that because markets are so stable, risk has dissipated.\n\nIn actuality, risk is skyrocketing beneath the surface of the artificial stability because the market has been stripped of the mechanisms of dynamic stability. This artificial stability derived from sustained manipulation has the superficial appearance of low-risk markets, i.e., low levels of volatility, but this lack of volatility derives not from transparency but from behind-the-scenes suppression of volatility.\nAnother source of risk in distorted markets is the illusion of liquidity: in low-volume markets of suppressed volatility, participants are encouraged to believe that they can buy and sell whatever securities they want in whatever volumes they want without disturbing market pricing and liquidity. In other words, participants are led to believe that the market will always have a bid due to the near-infinite depth of liquidity: no matter how many billions of dollars of securities you want to sell, there will always be a bid for your shares.\nIn actual fact, the bid is paper-thin and it vanishes altogether once selling rises above very low levels. Heavily manipulated markets are exquisitely sensitive to selling because the entire point is to limit any urge to sell while encouraging the greed to increase gains by buying more.\nThe illusions of low risk, essentially guaranteed gains for those who increase their positions and near-infinite liquidity generate overwhelming incentives to borrow more and leverage it to the hilt to maximize gains. The blissfully delusional punter feels the decision to borrow the maximum available and leverage it to the maximum is entirely rational due to the \"obvious\" absence of risk, the \"obvious\" guaranteed gains offered by markets lofting ever higher like clockwork and the \"obvious\" abundance of liquidity, assuring the punter they can always sell their entire position at today's prices and lock in profits at any time.\nOn top of all these grossly misleading distortions, punters have been encouraged to believe in the ultimate distortion: the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline again, ever. This is the perfection of moral hazard: risk has been disconnected from consequence.\nIn this perfection of moral hazard, punters consider it entirely rational to increase extremely risky speculative bets because the Federal Reserve will never let markets decline. Given the abundant evidence behind this assumption, it would be irrational not to ramp up crazy-risky speculative bets to the maximum because losses are now impossible thanks to the Fed's implicit promise to never let markets drop.\nThis is why distorted, manipulated markets always end the same way: first, in an unexpected emergence of risk, which was presumed to be banished; second, a market crash as the paper-thin bid disappears and prices flash-crash to levels that wipe out all those forced to sell by margin calls, and then the collapse of faith in the manipulators (the Fed), collapse of the collateral supporting trillions of dollars in highly leveraged debt and then the collapse of the entire delusion-based financial system.\n\nGordon Long and I illuminate the many layers of distortion, manipulation and moral hazard in our new video presentation, It Always Ends The Same Way (34:33). Amidst the ruins generated by well-meaning manipulation and distortion, the \"well meaning\" part will leave an extremely long-lasting bitter taste in all those who failed to differentiate between the false signals and distorted information of manipulated markets and the trustworthy transparency of signals arising in truly open markets.\nIn summary: risk has not been extinguished, it is expanding geometrically beneath the false stability of a monstrously manipulated market. As I often note here,risk cannot be extinguished, it can only be transferred. By distorting markets to create an illusion of low-risk stability, the Federal Reserve has transferred this fatal supernova of risk to the entire financial system.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":728,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":127681816,"gmtCreate":1624846152635,"gmtModify":1703846045743,"author":{"id":"3583800505467680","authorId":"3583800505467680","name":"nailclipper","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dd7f7188273b9053103027e7b842d3d","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3583800505467680","idStr":"3583800505467680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"wa","listText":"wa","text":"wa","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/127681816","repostId":"1108214079","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108214079","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1624607367,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108214079?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-06-25 15:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"All 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108214079","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we a","content":"<p>As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve announced that all banks easily clearedtheir annual bill of health, acing their annual stress test which found that banks could suffer almost $500 billion in losses and still comfortably meet capital requirements, setting the scene for hundreds of billions in stock buybacks and dividends.</p>\n<p>The \"test\" showed the country’s biggest banks could withstand $474 billion in losses from loans and other positions, and still emerge with more than double the required high-quality common equity tier one, or CET1, capital relative to their risk-weighted assets.</p>\n<p>In a statement published by the Federal Reserve Board, the Fed said that the results of the annual bank stress test showed that large banks \"continue to have strong capital levels and could continue lending to households and businesses during a severe recession.\"</p>\n<p>\"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve has run three stress tests with several different hypothetical recessions and all have confirmed that the banking system is strongly positioned to support the ongoing recovery,\" said Vice Chair for Supervision Randal K. Quarles.</p>\n<p><b>All 23 large banks tested remained well above their risk-based minimum capital requirements,</b>and as laid out previously by the Board, the additional restrictions put in place during the COVID event will end. As a result, all large banks will be subject to the normal restrictions of the Board's stress capital buffer, or SCB, framework.</p>\n<p>The SCB framework was finalized last year and maintains strong capital requirements in the aggregate for large banks with an increase in requirements for the largest and most complex banks. It sets capital requirements via the stress tests, and as a result, banks are required to hold enough capital to survive a severe recession. If a bank does not stay above its capital requirements, which include the SCB, it is subject to automatic restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.</p>\n<p>Naturally this is great news,<b>and it means that banks no longer need the Fed's $120BN in monthly QE right?</b></p>\n<p>Joking aside, having aced their tests the six largest US banks - a group that also includes Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs - will now pay out approximately $142 billion in capital to shareholders, paving the way for them to double total shareholder payouts in the next four quarters, according to data compiled by Bloomberg based on estimates provided by analysts at Barclays Plc.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c0f4f744baea705298a632057a1089d\" tg-width=\"642\" tg-height=\"339\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>For those wondering just what the Fed \"tested\" for,this year's hypothetical scenarioincludes a \"severe\" global recession with substantial stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets:</p>\n<ul>\n <li>The unemployment rate rises by 4 percentage points to a peak of 10-3/4 percent.</li>\n <li>Gross domestic product falls 4 percent from the fourth quarter of 2020 through the third quarter of 2022.</li>\n <li>And asset prices decline sharply, with a 55 percent decline in equity prices (unclear how many trillions the Fed would have to inject in this scenario to stabilize stonks).</li>\n</ul>\n<p>Under that scenario, the Fed calculated that<b>the 23 large banks would collectively lose more than $470 billion, with nearly $160 billion losses from commercial real estate and corporate loans.</b></p>\n<p>Of banks headquartered in the US, investment banking groups Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley suffered the biggest hits to their capital ratios in the stress tests, with declines of 5.9 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively. This compared to an average decline of 2.4% points for the 23 banks that underwent the tests, which included the American subsidiaries of foreign banks with significant US operations.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7cf2f5302333e2e68ae4bf1a48962627\" tg-width=\"819\" tg-height=\"620\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Even in a worst case scenario capital ratios would decline to only 10.6%, still more than double their minimum requirements.</p>\n<p>Consumer debt accounted for a smaller portion of overall losses than previous years since most retail customers spent the past year paying down credit cards and other loans during the Covid-19 pandemic. But an increase in expected losses in commercial and industrial loans more than offset that decline. Nearly $160bn of the losses came from commercial real estate and corporate loans.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/602b5d94c01e097ef93f83f6b70ade10\" tg-width=\"956\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>A summary of how the various bank capital ratios would be impact under the Fed's stress scenarios is shown below.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d8a6aa543d4ad0e3d044e4397a77ad2c\" tg-width=\"973\" tg-height=\"961\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The Fed also said that, as expected, it would lift pandemic restrictions on bank share buybacks and dividends on June 30th after banks clear stress tests.</p>\n<p>The next step is on Monday, June 28: the Fed expects banks to wait until then to analyze the results of the stress tests before announcing any plans for new shareholder payouts, according to senior Fed officials. Then, after the market close, banks can unveil their capital distribution plans. From the tests, the Fed will also prescribe for each bank how much CET1 capital in excess of regulatory minimums they need to keep through a so-called stress capital buffer. The CET1 ratio measured against risk-weighted assets is a crucial benchmark of financial stability.</p>\n<p>Barclays analysts estimate the median bank out of the 20 relevant institutions it covers will return over 100 per cent of its earnings to shareholders over the next year, with capital returned to investors approaching $200bn.</p>\n<p>In immediate response, the market - which knew the outcome of the test well in advance - bid up bank stocks which rose in postmarket trading, with Bank of America leading the rally among big banks, rising 1.6%; Morgan Stanley +1%, Citigroup +0.9% and Wells Fargo +0.8%, JPMorgan +0.7%, Goldman Sachs +0.6%.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f1c7c394ce7aae8679dfe85b5e987060\" tg-width=\"512\" tg-height=\"335\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a670e03c93a58825a2398a12f3756c6b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"328\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>* * *</p>\n<p>And while all of the above was exactly as expected, overnight Credit Suisse repo guru Zoltan Poszar warned of a potentially troubling twist.</p>\n<p>In his latest Global Money Dispatch, Pozsar notes that among other things, today's stress test results will determine the stress capital buffers (SCB) large banks will have to hold in 2022, which will affect their CET1 minimums. Naturally,<b>lower SCBs allow the largest U.S. banks to run with higher G-SIB surcharges, and this trade-off is particularly important for J.P. Morgan.</b>According to Pozsar,&nbsp; the bank will be more willing to let its G-SIB surcharge climb to 5% this year from 4% last year if its SCB comes in around 2.5%, down from 3.3% currently. As a result, today's release may have \"<i>a big impact on the pricing of the year-end turn in FX swaps: if J.P. Morgan’s SCB drops a lot, year-end premia might shrink a lot from here.\"</i></p>\n<p>There's more: looking ahead to the June 30 expiration of stock buyback limitations, the Hungarian repo guru writes that<b>the upcoming wave of buybacks \"destroy balance sheet capacity in the banking system\" as banks that return capital to shareholders have less capital to leverage up.</b></p>\n<p>Here's the math:<i>with a 5% Supplemental Liquidity Ratio minimum at the holdco level,</i><i><b>banks run 20-times leverage, which means that $10 billion in stock buybacks means $200 billion less of banks’ demand for reserves, Treasuries, MBS, and deposits.</b></i></p>\n<p>This means that as banks rush to handout cash to shareholders, they will be forced to park even more reserves elsewhere... like for example the Fed's reverse repo facility. This “push” by banks to shed capacity and potentially some deposits will meet the “sucking sound” of the RRP facility in coming weeks. It comes as usage of the Fed's reverse repo facility has been rising by tens of billions daily and on Wednesday just hit a record $813.6 billion.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/391bdb2316b81ed40abaf3e0280d35a1\" tg-width=\"1170\" tg-height=\"628\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>Now imagine what will happen to the RRP facility if banks indeed proceed to repurchase $142BN in stock; applying Pozsar's 20x leverage multiple, this means that bank balance sheets will shrink by just under $3 trillion, including trillions in reserves which will have to be parked at the Fed, which also means that in the coming weeks usage on the Fed's reserve facility is set to explode to unprecedented levels. This in turn will only accelerate the next funding crisis (now that the banking system has shifted from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market) thanks to the Fed's IOER/RRP rate hike), as we described in \"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis.\"</p>\n<p>One final technical consideration from Zoltan is that the flattening of the yield curve in recent days hit bank stocks,<b>so banks may start buybacks on July 1st, which means banks might choose to stay liquid around quarter-end.</b>This will be an extra factor to consider in pricing the June quarter-end turn.</p>\n<p>As Pozsar concludes,<b>\"ample liquidity is ample only if banks are willing to trade it, and trading liquidity means giving it up, which large banks might not want to do when the “pull” of the o/n RRP facility can complicate re-starting buybacks as early as July 1st.</b>\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>All 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAll 23 US Banks Easily Pass Fed's Stress Test, Setting Stage For Billions In Buybacks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-06-25 15:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MS":"摩根士丹利","WFC":"富国银行","BAC":"美国银行","KBE":"银行指数ETF-SPDR KBW","GS":"高盛","C":"花旗","JPM":"摩根大通"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/all-23-us-banks-easily-pass-feds-stress-test-setting-stage-billions-buybacks","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108214079","content_text":"As wepreviewed earlier, today the Fed would release the latest bank Stress Test results, and as we also cynically expected, every bank would pass and sure enough moments ago theFederal Reserve announced that all banks easily clearedtheir annual bill of health, acing their annual stress test which found that banks could suffer almost $500 billion in losses and still comfortably meet capital requirements, setting the scene for hundreds of billions in stock buybacks and dividends.\nThe \"test\" showed the country’s biggest banks could withstand $474 billion in losses from loans and other positions, and still emerge with more than double the required high-quality common equity tier one, or CET1, capital relative to their risk-weighted assets.\nIn a statement published by the Federal Reserve Board, the Fed said that the results of the annual bank stress test showed that large banks \"continue to have strong capital levels and could continue lending to households and businesses during a severe recession.\"\n\"Over the past year, the Federal Reserve has run three stress tests with several different hypothetical recessions and all have confirmed that the banking system is strongly positioned to support the ongoing recovery,\" said Vice Chair for Supervision Randal K. Quarles.\nAll 23 large banks tested remained well above their risk-based minimum capital requirements,and as laid out previously by the Board, the additional restrictions put in place during the COVID event will end. As a result, all large banks will be subject to the normal restrictions of the Board's stress capital buffer, or SCB, framework.\nThe SCB framework was finalized last year and maintains strong capital requirements in the aggregate for large banks with an increase in requirements for the largest and most complex banks. It sets capital requirements via the stress tests, and as a result, banks are required to hold enough capital to survive a severe recession. If a bank does not stay above its capital requirements, which include the SCB, it is subject to automatic restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments.\nNaturally this is great news,and it means that banks no longer need the Fed's $120BN in monthly QE right?\nJoking aside, having aced their tests the six largest US banks - a group that also includes Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs - will now pay out approximately $142 billion in capital to shareholders, paving the way for them to double total shareholder payouts in the next four quarters, according to data compiled by Bloomberg based on estimates provided by analysts at Barclays Plc.\n\nFor those wondering just what the Fed \"tested\" for,this year's hypothetical scenarioincludes a \"severe\" global recession with substantial stress in commercial real estate and corporate debt markets:\n\nThe unemployment rate rises by 4 percentage points to a peak of 10-3/4 percent.\nGross domestic product falls 4 percent from the fourth quarter of 2020 through the third quarter of 2022.\nAnd asset prices decline sharply, with a 55 percent decline in equity prices (unclear how many trillions the Fed would have to inject in this scenario to stabilize stonks).\n\nUnder that scenario, the Fed calculated thatthe 23 large banks would collectively lose more than $470 billion, with nearly $160 billion losses from commercial real estate and corporate loans.\nOf banks headquartered in the US, investment banking groups Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley suffered the biggest hits to their capital ratios in the stress tests, with declines of 5.9 and 4.7 percentage points, respectively. This compared to an average decline of 2.4% points for the 23 banks that underwent the tests, which included the American subsidiaries of foreign banks with significant US operations.\n\nEven in a worst case scenario capital ratios would decline to only 10.6%, still more than double their minimum requirements.\nConsumer debt accounted for a smaller portion of overall losses than previous years since most retail customers spent the past year paying down credit cards and other loans during the Covid-19 pandemic. But an increase in expected losses in commercial and industrial loans more than offset that decline. Nearly $160bn of the losses came from commercial real estate and corporate loans.\n\nA summary of how the various bank capital ratios would be impact under the Fed's stress scenarios is shown below.\n\nThe Fed also said that, as expected, it would lift pandemic restrictions on bank share buybacks and dividends on June 30th after banks clear stress tests.\nThe next step is on Monday, June 28: the Fed expects banks to wait until then to analyze the results of the stress tests before announcing any plans for new shareholder payouts, according to senior Fed officials. Then, after the market close, banks can unveil their capital distribution plans. From the tests, the Fed will also prescribe for each bank how much CET1 capital in excess of regulatory minimums they need to keep through a so-called stress capital buffer. The CET1 ratio measured against risk-weighted assets is a crucial benchmark of financial stability.\nBarclays analysts estimate the median bank out of the 20 relevant institutions it covers will return over 100 per cent of its earnings to shareholders over the next year, with capital returned to investors approaching $200bn.\nIn immediate response, the market - which knew the outcome of the test well in advance - bid up bank stocks which rose in postmarket trading, with Bank of America leading the rally among big banks, rising 1.6%; Morgan Stanley +1%, Citigroup +0.9% and Wells Fargo +0.8%, JPMorgan +0.7%, Goldman Sachs +0.6%.\n\n* * *\nAnd while all of the above was exactly as expected, overnight Credit Suisse repo guru Zoltan Poszar warned of a potentially troubling twist.\nIn his latest Global Money Dispatch, Pozsar notes that among other things, today's stress test results will determine the stress capital buffers (SCB) large banks will have to hold in 2022, which will affect their CET1 minimums. Naturally,lower SCBs allow the largest U.S. banks to run with higher G-SIB surcharges, and this trade-off is particularly important for J.P. Morgan.According to Pozsar,  the bank will be more willing to let its G-SIB surcharge climb to 5% this year from 4% last year if its SCB comes in around 2.5%, down from 3.3% currently. As a result, today's release may have \"a big impact on the pricing of the year-end turn in FX swaps: if J.P. Morgan’s SCB drops a lot, year-end premia might shrink a lot from here.\"\nThere's more: looking ahead to the June 30 expiration of stock buyback limitations, the Hungarian repo guru writes thatthe upcoming wave of buybacks \"destroy balance sheet capacity in the banking system\" as banks that return capital to shareholders have less capital to leverage up.\nHere's the math:with a 5% Supplemental Liquidity Ratio minimum at the holdco level,banks run 20-times leverage, which means that $10 billion in stock buybacks means $200 billion less of banks’ demand for reserves, Treasuries, MBS, and deposits.\nThis means that as banks rush to handout cash to shareholders, they will be forced to park even more reserves elsewhere... like for example the Fed's reverse repo facility. This “push” by banks to shed capacity and potentially some deposits will meet the “sucking sound” of the RRP facility in coming weeks. It comes as usage of the Fed's reverse repo facility has been rising by tens of billions daily and on Wednesday just hit a record $813.6 billion.\n\nNow imagine what will happen to the RRP facility if banks indeed proceed to repurchase $142BN in stock; applying Pozsar's 20x leverage multiple, this means that bank balance sheets will shrink by just under $3 trillion, including trillions in reserves which will have to be parked at the Fed, which also means that in the coming weeks usage on the Fed's reserve facility is set to explode to unprecedented levels. This in turn will only accelerate the next funding crisis (now that the banking system has shifted from being asset constrained (deposits flooding in, but nowhere to lend them but to the Fed), to being liability constrained (deposits slipping away and nowhere to replace them but in the money market) thanks to the Fed's IOER/RRP rate hike), as we described in \"Powell Just Launched $2 Trillion In \"Heat-Seeking Missiles\": Zoltan Explains How The Fed Started The Next Repo Crisis.\"\nOne final technical consideration from Zoltan is that the flattening of the yield curve in recent days hit bank stocks,so banks may start buybacks on July 1st, which means banks might choose to stay liquid around quarter-end.This will be an extra factor to consider in pricing the June quarter-end turn.\nAs Pozsar concludes,\"ample liquidity is ample only if banks are willing to trade it, and trading liquidity means giving it up, which large banks might not want to do when the “pull” of the o/n RRP facility can complicate re-starting buybacks as early as July 1st.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"JPM":0.9,"KBE":0.9,"WFC":0.9,"C":0.9,"GS":0.9,"MS":0.9,"BAC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":624,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}