Hamiah personal page - To The Moon

Hamiah

No personal profile

3Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

02:33

Share your opinion about this news…

Elon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close

07-14

Share your opinion about this news…

IBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure

04-30

Share your opinion about this news…

Jerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’

04-20

Share your opinion about this news…

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4225866006134732","uuid":"4225866006134732","gmtCreate":1762763643316,"gmtModify":1762831967823,"name":"Hamiah","pinyin":"hamiah","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.12.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":617177959641272,"gmtCreate":1791657201903,"gmtModify":1791686188019,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4225866006134732","authorIdStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/617177959641272","repostId":"2674865154","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2674865154","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1791630558,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2674865154?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-10-10 19:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2674865154","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Musk's trillioniare status means he's wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. RockefellerA rally in SpaceX and Tesla shares sen","content":"<html><head></head><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s trillioniare status means he&#39;s wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n</p>\n<p>\n     A rally in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s wealth has earned him the title of the world&#39;s first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As of Thursday, Musk&#39;s net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk&#39;s wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n</p>\n<p>\n     These positions make Musk&#39;s net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX&#39;s IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s current net worth makes him richer than the world&#39;s next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk&#39;s current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk&#39;s net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk&#39;s net worth has nearly tripled. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes&#39; 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual&#39;s peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals&#39; exact peak fortunes. Carnegie&#39;s figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n</p>\n<p>\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk&#39;s fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller&#39;s wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n</p>\n<p>\n     -Christine Ji \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\"> \n</pre>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-10-10 19:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s trillioniare status means he&#39;s wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n</p>\n<p>\n     A rally in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s wealth has earned him the title of the world&#39;s first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As of Thursday, Musk&#39;s net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk&#39;s wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n</p>\n<p>\n     These positions make Musk&#39;s net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX&#39;s IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s current net worth makes him richer than the world&#39;s next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk&#39;s current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk&#39;s net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk&#39;s net worth has nearly tripled. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes&#39; 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual&#39;s peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals&#39; exact peak fortunes. Carnegie&#39;s figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n</p>\n<p>\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk&#39;s fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller&#39;s wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n</p>\n<p>\n     -Christine Ji \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\"> \n</pre>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2674865154","content_text":"Musk's trillioniare status means he's wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n\n\n     A rally in SpaceX and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk's net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n\n\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk's net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n\n\n     Musk's wealth has earned him the title of the world's first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n\n\n     As of Thursday, Musk's net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk's wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n\n\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n\n\n     These positions make Musk's net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX's IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n\n\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n\n\n     Musk's current net worth makes him richer than the world's next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n\n\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk's current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk's net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk's net worth has nearly tripled. \n\n\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n\n\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n\n\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes' 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual's peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today's economy. \n\n\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals' exact peak fortunes. Carnegie's figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n\n\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk's fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n\n\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n\n\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller's wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today's economy. \n\n\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n\n\n     -Christine Ji","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":1.92}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":585717308851416,"gmtCreate":1784027634390,"gmtModify":1784028028437,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4225866006134732","authorIdStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/585717308851416","repostId":"1131438770","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1131438770","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Track stock‘s movements and relevant news","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock Track","id":"1086803395","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390"},"pubTimestamp":1784027381,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131438770?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-07-14 19:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"IBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131438770","media":"Stock Track","summary":"$IBM(IBM)$'s stock tumbled 16.5% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.The...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>&#39;s stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff3e6781702fdc845f06ed8bdad58328\" tg-width=\"538\" tg-height=\"158\"/></p><p>The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company&#39;s GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was &#34;worse than our expectations,&#34; citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.</p><p>Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to &#34;Reduce&#34; from &#34;Hold&#34; and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM&#39;s enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>IBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1086803395\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock Track </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-07-14 19:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>&#39;s stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff3e6781702fdc845f06ed8bdad58328\" tg-width=\"538\" tg-height=\"158\"/></p><p>The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company&#39;s GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was &#34;worse than our expectations,&#34; citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.</p><p>Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to &#34;Reduce&#34; from &#34;Hold&#34; and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM&#39;s enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IBM":"IBM"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131438770","content_text":"IBM's stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company's GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was \"worse than our expectations,\" citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to \"Reduce\" from \"Hold\" and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM's enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"IBM":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":804,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":558927125676872,"gmtCreate":1777488641127,"gmtModify":1777489576599,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4225866006134732","authorIdStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/558927125676872","repostId":"2631540384","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2631540384","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1777487760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2631540384?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-04-30 02:36","market":"nz","language":"en","title":"Jerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2631540384","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Jerome Powell kicked off his final press conference as Federal Reserve chair going over the economic developments highlighted in the Federal Open Market Committee's statement. He mentioned the recent pickup in inflation and the high level of uncertainty in the economic outlook because of the conflict in the Middle East. The economy is expanding at a solid pace, he noted.This item is part of a Wall Street Journal live coverage event. The full stream can be found by searching P/WSJL .","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.</p><p>“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”</p><p>Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-04-30 02:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.</p><p>“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”</p><p>Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TMF":"3倍做多20年期以上国债ETF-Direxion","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SPDN":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares","SPYM":"投资组合标普500指数ETF-SPDR","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares",".DJI":"道琼斯","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","SPXS":"三倍做空标普500ETF-Direxion","SPYQ":"2倍做多SPY Quarterly ETF-Tradr",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF","YSPY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","HIBL":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares","SMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER SEP ETF","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","TLTW":"iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF","SPYU":"MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","BK4588":"碎股","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","MMAX":"iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF","SPXL":"三倍做多标普500ETF-Direxion","TLT":"20+年以上美国国债ETF-iShares","DMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER DEC ETF","DIA":"道琼斯ETF","SPYH":"Neos S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF","SPUU":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","BK4096":"电气部件与设备","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2631540384","content_text":"Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"US5Y.BOND":1.5,"SSO":0.6,"DOG":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"VOO":0.6,"US10Y.BOND":1.5,"SPUU":0.6,"DXD":0.6,"DMAX":0.6,"US7Y.BOND":1.5,"DIA":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"TLTW":0.6,"TMF":0.6,"US6M.BOND":1.5,".SPX":2,"SDOW":0.6,"MMAX":0.6,"SPXL":0.6,"DDM":0.6,".IXIC":2,"SPY":0.6,"YSPY":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"SPYM":0.6,"HIBL":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"SPYU":0.6,"US12M.BOND":1.5,"SPYH":0.6,"SMAX":0.6,"UDOW":0.6,".DJI":2,"SPXS":0.6,"SPYQ":0.6,"SPDN":0.6,"TLT":0.6,"US30Y.BOND":1.5,"US2Y.BOND":1.5,"SH":0.6,"US3Y.BOND":1.5}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1901,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":555702834352384,"gmtCreate":1776680505062,"gmtModify":1776681756618,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4225866006134732","authorIdStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/555702834352384","repostId":"2628276885","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1832,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":585717308851416,"gmtCreate":1784027634390,"gmtModify":1784028028437,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4225866006134732","idStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/585717308851416","repostId":"1131438770","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1131438770","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Track stock‘s movements and relevant news","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock Track","id":"1086803395","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390"},"pubTimestamp":1784027381,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131438770?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-07-14 19:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"IBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131438770","media":"Stock Track","summary":"$IBM(IBM)$'s stock tumbled 16.5% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.The...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>&#39;s stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff3e6781702fdc845f06ed8bdad58328\" tg-width=\"538\" tg-height=\"158\"/></p><p>The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company&#39;s GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was &#34;worse than our expectations,&#34; citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.</p><p>Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to &#34;Reduce&#34; from &#34;Hold&#34; and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM&#39;s enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>IBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIBM Plunges on Earnings Miss, HSBC Downgrade and AI Competitive Pressure\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1086803395\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock Track </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-07-14 19:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a>&#39;s stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ff3e6781702fdc845f06ed8bdad58328\" tg-width=\"538\" tg-height=\"158\"/></p><p>The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company&#39;s GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was &#34;worse than our expectations,&#34; citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.</p><p>Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to &#34;Reduce&#34; from &#34;Hold&#34; and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM&#39;s enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IBM":"IBM"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131438770","content_text":"IBM's stock tumbled 17% in pre-market trading on Tuesday, following the release of disappointing preliminary second-quarter financial results and a significant analyst downgrade.The technology giant reported revenue growth of just 1% year-over-year to $17.2 billion, with its Infrastructure segment declining 7%. The company's GAAP diluted earnings per share fell 2% to $2.27, missing expectations. In a letter to investors, CEO Arvind Krishna acknowledged that performance was \"worse than our expectations,\" citing client spending shifts toward supply-constrained hardware and industry-wide cybersecurity concerns that distracted from deal closures.Adding to the negative sentiment, HSBC downgraded IBM to \"Reduce\" from \"Hold\" and slashed its price target to $191 from $231. Furthermore, market concerns were amplified by reports that Starbucks is developing AI-powered internal software tools to replace certain IBM applications, potentially signaling a broader threat to IBM's enterprise software and consulting business as AI lowers development barriers.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"IBM":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":804,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":558927125676872,"gmtCreate":1777488641127,"gmtModify":1777489576599,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4225866006134732","idStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/558927125676872","repostId":"2631540384","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2631540384","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1777487760,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2631540384?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-04-30 02:36","market":"nz","language":"en","title":"Jerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2631540384","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Jerome Powell kicked off his final press conference as Federal Reserve chair going over the economic developments highlighted in the Federal Open Market Committee's statement. He mentioned the recent pickup in inflation and the high level of uncertainty in the economic outlook because of the conflict in the Middle East. The economy is expanding at a solid pace, he noted.This item is part of a Wall Street Journal live coverage event. The full stream can be found by searching P/WSJL .","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.</p><p>“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”</p><p>Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Jerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nJerome Powell Says He Will Continue To Serve As A Fed Governor, Calls Trump Criticism ‘Unprecedented’\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-04-30 02:36</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.</p><p>“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”</p><p>Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TMF":"3倍做多20年期以上国债ETF-Direxion","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SPDN":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares","SPYM":"投资组合标普500指数ETF-SPDR","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares",".DJI":"道琼斯","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","SPXS":"三倍做空标普500ETF-Direxion","SPYQ":"2倍做多SPY Quarterly ETF-Tradr",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SPY":"标普500ETF","YSPY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","HIBL":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares","SMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER SEP ETF","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","TLTW":"iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF","SPYU":"MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","BK4588":"碎股","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","MMAX":"iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF","SPXL":"三倍做多标普500ETF-Direxion","TLT":"20+年以上美国国债ETF-iShares","DMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER DEC ETF","DIA":"道琼斯ETF","SPYH":"Neos S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF","SPUU":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","BK4096":"电气部件与设备","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2631540384","content_text":"Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday said he will stay on the Board of Governors for an indefinite period while a probe into the renovation of the central bank’s headquarters continues.“I’ve said that I will not leave the board until this investigation is well and truly over with transparency and finality, and I stand by that. I’m encouraged by recent developments, and I’m watching the remaining steps in this process carefully,” Powell said near the beginning of his post-meeting news conference.“My decisions on these matters will continue to be guided entirely by what I believe is in the best interest of the institution and the people we serve after my term as chair ends on May 15, and will continue to serve as a governor for a period of time to be determined,” he added.The statement resolves for the moment a key question that hovered over the Federal Open Market Committee meeting.Markets already had largely expected to keep its key interest rate steady, with the bigger question over Powell’s future.The chair, who has served eight years, congratulated his appointed successor Kevin Warsh, whose nominee cleared a pivotal hurdle earlier Wednesday when the Senate Banking Committee voted to move Warsh forward to the full floor for a vote.“I plan to keep a low profile as a governor,” Powell said. “There’s only ever one chair ... When Kevin Marsh is confirmed and sworn in, he will be that chair.”Beyond Warsh, Powell addressed the intense criticism he has faced from President Donald Trump, who appointed Powell to the job during his first term in office.Powell called the criticism “unprecedented in our 113-year history” and said he worries about the impact on the institution.“I worry that these attacks are battering the institution and putting at risk the thing that really matters to the public, which is the ability to conduct monetary policies without taking into consideration political factors,” he said. “It is so important for our economy, for the people that we serve, that they can depend, over time, on a central bank that operates that way, free of political influence.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"US5Y.BOND":1.5,"SSO":0.6,"DOG":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"VOO":0.6,"US10Y.BOND":1.5,"SPUU":0.6,"DXD":0.6,"DMAX":0.6,"US7Y.BOND":1.5,"DIA":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"TLTW":0.6,"TMF":0.6,"US6M.BOND":1.5,".SPX":2,"SDOW":0.6,"MMAX":0.6,"SPXL":0.6,"DDM":0.6,".IXIC":2,"SPY":0.6,"YSPY":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"SPYM":0.6,"HIBL":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"SPYU":0.6,"US12M.BOND":1.5,"SPYH":0.6,"SMAX":0.6,"UDOW":0.6,".DJI":2,"SPXS":0.6,"SPYQ":0.6,"SPDN":0.6,"TLT":0.6,"US30Y.BOND":1.5,"US2Y.BOND":1.5,"SH":0.6,"US3Y.BOND":1.5}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1901,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":555702834352384,"gmtCreate":1776680505062,"gmtModify":1776681756618,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4225866006134732","idStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/555702834352384","repostId":"2628276885","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2628276885","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1776655320,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2628276885?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-04-20 11:22","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"The Record Stock Market Rests on Some Big One-Offs","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2628276885","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"It's six months, give or take, since AI excitement drove stock valuations above their 2020 bubble high to reach the highest since 2000, the peak of the dot-com bubble.Something odd has happened since: Valuations, measured as the price-to-earnings or PE ratio, have plunged, while stocks rose to a record high this week.This isn't just unusual. It is unprecedented in data back to 1985. Valuations have never fallen so much over six months without stocks falling too.It helps to understand the basic mechanics of the PE ratio. The most useful version, the forward PE, measures a company's stock price against how much Wall Street analysts on average expect the company to earn in profit over the next year. At its October peak, the S&P 500 PE ratio was above 23.A related way to measure PE is to adjust it for how fast a company's profits are expected to grow. Do this for the eight biggest tech and AI stocks and they were cheaper on the so-called PE-to-growth  ratio early this past week than they'v","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>There are two significant reasons earnings expectations have soared—and they are both probably temporary.</p><p>It&#39;s six months, give or take, since AI excitement drove stock valuations above their 2020 bubble high to reach the highest since 2000, the peak of the dot-com bubble.</p><p>Something odd has happened since: Valuations, measured as the price-to-earnings or PE ratio, have plunged, while stocks rose to a record high this week.</p><p>This isn&#39;t just unusual. It is unprecedented in data back to 1985. Valuations have never fallen so much over six months without stocks falling too.</p><p>It helps to understand the basic mechanics of the PE ratio. The most useful version, the forward PE, measures a company&#39;s stock price against how much Wall Street analysts on average expect the company to earn in profit over the next year. At its October peak, the S&amp;P 500 PE ratio was above 23.</p><p>The reason for the recent drop in valuation is also unusual: The E part of the PE ratio, companies&#39; expected earnings, has soared. Because stock prices have made only small gains -- the S&amp;P 500 is up 3% from its high in October -- the PE ratio has dropped, meaning shares are less expensive than back then. The rebound has lifted the index back up to 22 times, after dropping below 20 times, though both are higher than the long-term average of 16.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fd8fab36f75b1a9c900318ab673c2480\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"465\"/></p><p>In the past, the norm was that when earnings expectations rose a lot, shareholders got very excited, and shares rose even more, so the stock was more highly valued.</p><p>Big drops in valuations were bad news: Until now they&#39;ve always been because earnings expectations soured even more than share prices fell, often because of a recession.</p><p>This time, there are two big reasons earnings expectations have soared -- and they are both probably temporary. The first is that microchip prices have soared because of huge artificial-intelligence demand. The second is the war in Iran, which has given energy companies a huge boost.</p><p>The question for investors: Do the stocks that have benefited from these one-off boosts really offer better value now?</p><p>The bull case for the AI stocks is that they are moving from a speculative trade closer to a reality where the technology makes real money.</p><p>In the months up to last October, AI-related stocks -- especially suppliers to data centers -- soared in the hope of something great, pushing up valuations while earnings predictions lagged behind.</p><p>In the past six months, stock prices gained little while analysts began to predict big profits. This brought their forward PE ratios back down from very expensive to be more reasonably priced. AI stocks, on this view, are proving their ability to grow into their valuations.</p><p>A related way to measure PE is to adjust it for how fast a company&#39;s profits are expected to grow. Do this for the eight biggest tech and AI stocks and they were cheaper on the so-called PE-to-growth (PEG) ratio early this past week than they&#39;ve been since 2013, according to Scott Chronert, head of U.S. equity strategy at Citigroup.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6c5e6beaa310dde4f650b38efaf6b365\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"467\"/></p><p>The bear case against AI stocks is that growth hopes are still far too high, data-center projections are way ahead of reality, Big Tech has gone from being capital-light to capital-hungry, and Wall Street forecasts are little better than guesswork anyway. On top of that, it&#39;s just plain weird that the risks of the Iran war&#39;s reigniting seem to have been forgotten by equity investors.</p><p>There&#39;s a middle path, neatly illustrated by Micron Technology, which makes fast-memory chips needed for AI. Soaring sales have far outstripped predictions and enabled the firm to jack up prices and profit margins. In October, the median analyst expected earnings of $19 a share in 2027. Now, they predict $101 a share. But as estimated 2027 earnings quintupled, the shares a bit more than doubled, so the PE ratio plunged.</p><p>That lower valuation doesn&#39;t mean the stock is cheap. Rather, it means superhigh profits are expected to be temporary. More capacity will eventually come online, as it always does in the highly cyclical memory-chip industry, and prices will drop. Data-center demand must eventually slow, too, as needs are met.</p><p>If data-center construction keeps going for years, and investors prove willing to finance it, that&#39;s great for Micron, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and other providers of the modern-day versions of picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. If AI breakthroughs reduce computing needs, or if AI adoption disappoints the high hopes of investors, it&#39;s terrible. A valuation based only on the next 12 months doesn&#39;t tell us whether to buy or sell, because a slowdown is likely only the year after, or further out.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d4de74fa408fbf214977731f2e0bad39\" tg-width=\"588\" tg-height=\"465\"/></p><p>Something similar applies to how oil stocks have behaved during the Iran war. The soaring oil price as first Iran and then the U.S. prevented oil exports from the Persian Gulf naturally led to higher earnings forecasts for big oil companies. Earnings for the three oil majors 12 months ahead are expected to be about a third higher than they were at the end of February.</p><p>Initially, Big Oil shares soared, as the prospect of war profits had investors salivating. But even as share prices rose, valuations were slightly down -- and this month the cease-fire led shares to slump back to where they started, even as profit forecasts rose further. The sector&#39;s forward PE has dropped from 23.8 times earnings before the war to 15.6 times.</p><p>As with chip makers, a temporary boost to earnings is welcome for shareholders. But what investors really want is a rise in profit every year. Oil futures were already prepared for the price to come back down, and it fell fast on Friday on news of the Strait of Hormuz reopening -- although Iran said it was closed again on Saturday, while markets were shut.</p><p>Current prices for both the AI stocks and oil are based on the market&#39;s best guess for the two themes of the moment: Data-center building and the Iran war. This has made the market look cheaper than before. But it wouldn&#39;t take much -- the AI boom&#39;s turning to bust or a peace deal in the Gulf -- to make today&#39;s cheapness look expensive in retrospect.</p><p></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Record Stock Market Rests on Some Big One-Offs</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Record Stock Market Rests on Some Big One-Offs\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-04-20 11:22</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>There are two significant reasons earnings expectations have soared—and they are both probably temporary.</p><p>It&#39;s six months, give or take, since AI excitement drove stock valuations above their 2020 bubble high to reach the highest since 2000, the peak of the dot-com bubble.</p><p>Something odd has happened since: Valuations, measured as the price-to-earnings or PE ratio, have plunged, while stocks rose to a record high this week.</p><p>This isn&#39;t just unusual. It is unprecedented in data back to 1985. Valuations have never fallen so much over six months without stocks falling too.</p><p>It helps to understand the basic mechanics of the PE ratio. The most useful version, the forward PE, measures a company&#39;s stock price against how much Wall Street analysts on average expect the company to earn in profit over the next year. At its October peak, the S&amp;P 500 PE ratio was above 23.</p><p>The reason for the recent drop in valuation is also unusual: The E part of the PE ratio, companies&#39; expected earnings, has soared. Because stock prices have made only small gains -- the S&amp;P 500 is up 3% from its high in October -- the PE ratio has dropped, meaning shares are less expensive than back then. The rebound has lifted the index back up to 22 times, after dropping below 20 times, though both are higher than the long-term average of 16.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fd8fab36f75b1a9c900318ab673c2480\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"465\"/></p><p>In the past, the norm was that when earnings expectations rose a lot, shareholders got very excited, and shares rose even more, so the stock was more highly valued.</p><p>Big drops in valuations were bad news: Until now they&#39;ve always been because earnings expectations soured even more than share prices fell, often because of a recession.</p><p>This time, there are two big reasons earnings expectations have soared -- and they are both probably temporary. The first is that microchip prices have soared because of huge artificial-intelligence demand. The second is the war in Iran, which has given energy companies a huge boost.</p><p>The question for investors: Do the stocks that have benefited from these one-off boosts really offer better value now?</p><p>The bull case for the AI stocks is that they are moving from a speculative trade closer to a reality where the technology makes real money.</p><p>In the months up to last October, AI-related stocks -- especially suppliers to data centers -- soared in the hope of something great, pushing up valuations while earnings predictions lagged behind.</p><p>In the past six months, stock prices gained little while analysts began to predict big profits. This brought their forward PE ratios back down from very expensive to be more reasonably priced. AI stocks, on this view, are proving their ability to grow into their valuations.</p><p>A related way to measure PE is to adjust it for how fast a company&#39;s profits are expected to grow. Do this for the eight biggest tech and AI stocks and they were cheaper on the so-called PE-to-growth (PEG) ratio early this past week than they&#39;ve been since 2013, according to Scott Chronert, head of U.S. equity strategy at Citigroup.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6c5e6beaa310dde4f650b38efaf6b365\" tg-width=\"584\" tg-height=\"467\"/></p><p>The bear case against AI stocks is that growth hopes are still far too high, data-center projections are way ahead of reality, Big Tech has gone from being capital-light to capital-hungry, and Wall Street forecasts are little better than guesswork anyway. On top of that, it&#39;s just plain weird that the risks of the Iran war&#39;s reigniting seem to have been forgotten by equity investors.</p><p>There&#39;s a middle path, neatly illustrated by Micron Technology, which makes fast-memory chips needed for AI. Soaring sales have far outstripped predictions and enabled the firm to jack up prices and profit margins. In October, the median analyst expected earnings of $19 a share in 2027. Now, they predict $101 a share. But as estimated 2027 earnings quintupled, the shares a bit more than doubled, so the PE ratio plunged.</p><p>That lower valuation doesn&#39;t mean the stock is cheap. Rather, it means superhigh profits are expected to be temporary. More capacity will eventually come online, as it always does in the highly cyclical memory-chip industry, and prices will drop. Data-center demand must eventually slow, too, as needs are met.</p><p>If data-center construction keeps going for years, and investors prove willing to finance it, that&#39;s great for Micron, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">Nvidia</a> and other providers of the modern-day versions of picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. If AI breakthroughs reduce computing needs, or if AI adoption disappoints the high hopes of investors, it&#39;s terrible. A valuation based only on the next 12 months doesn&#39;t tell us whether to buy or sell, because a slowdown is likely only the year after, or further out.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d4de74fa408fbf214977731f2e0bad39\" tg-width=\"588\" tg-height=\"465\"/></p><p>Something similar applies to how oil stocks have behaved during the Iran war. The soaring oil price as first Iran and then the U.S. prevented oil exports from the Persian Gulf naturally led to higher earnings forecasts for big oil companies. Earnings for the three oil majors 12 months ahead are expected to be about a third higher than they were at the end of February.</p><p>Initially, Big Oil shares soared, as the prospect of war profits had investors salivating. But even as share prices rose, valuations were slightly down -- and this month the cease-fire led shares to slump back to where they started, even as profit forecasts rose further. The sector&#39;s forward PE has dropped from 23.8 times earnings before the war to 15.6 times.</p><p>As with chip makers, a temporary boost to earnings is welcome for shareholders. But what investors really want is a rise in profit every year. Oil futures were already prepared for the price to come back down, and it fell fast on Friday on news of the Strait of Hormuz reopening -- although Iran said it was closed again on Saturday, while markets were shut.</p><p>Current prices for both the AI stocks and oil are based on the market&#39;s best guess for the two themes of the moment: Data-center building and the Iran war. This has made the market look cheaper than before. But it wouldn&#39;t take much -- the AI boom&#39;s turning to bust or a peace deal in the Gulf -- to make today&#39;s cheapness look expensive in retrospect.</p><p></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"IE00BMG7P587.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INCOM \"A\" (USD) INC","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","BK4543":"AI","IE00BD4GTV84.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGEINFRASTRUCTURE VALUE \"A\" (USDHDG) ACC","IE00BD4GTW91.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGEINFRASTRUCTURE VALUE \"A\" (USDHDG) INC","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","IE00BD4GTT62.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge Infrastructure Value A SGD-H (mdis) plus","LU2500361329.USD":"NORDEA 1 GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE LISTED REAL ASSETS \"B\" (USD) ACC","IE00BMG7P819.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","IE00BMG7P694.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Mdis USD Plus","BK4528":"SaaS概念","BK4588":"碎股","BK4208":"复合型公用事业","BK4023":"应用软件","LU2346227817.USD":"BGF SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"A2\" (USD) ACC","NVDA":"英伟达","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","IE00BMG7P926.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Global Infrastructure Income A Acc USD"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2628276885","content_text":"There are two significant reasons earnings expectations have soared—and they are both probably temporary.It's six months, give or take, since AI excitement drove stock valuations above their 2020 bubble high to reach the highest since 2000, the peak of the dot-com bubble.Something odd has happened since: Valuations, measured as the price-to-earnings or PE ratio, have plunged, while stocks rose to a record high this week.This isn't just unusual. It is unprecedented in data back to 1985. Valuations have never fallen so much over six months without stocks falling too.It helps to understand the basic mechanics of the PE ratio. The most useful version, the forward PE, measures a company's stock price against how much Wall Street analysts on average expect the company to earn in profit over the next year. At its October peak, the S&P 500 PE ratio was above 23.The reason for the recent drop in valuation is also unusual: The E part of the PE ratio, companies' expected earnings, has soared. Because stock prices have made only small gains -- the S&P 500 is up 3% from its high in October -- the PE ratio has dropped, meaning shares are less expensive than back then. The rebound has lifted the index back up to 22 times, after dropping below 20 times, though both are higher than the long-term average of 16.In the past, the norm was that when earnings expectations rose a lot, shareholders got very excited, and shares rose even more, so the stock was more highly valued.Big drops in valuations were bad news: Until now they've always been because earnings expectations soured even more than share prices fell, often because of a recession.This time, there are two big reasons earnings expectations have soared -- and they are both probably temporary. The first is that microchip prices have soared because of huge artificial-intelligence demand. The second is the war in Iran, which has given energy companies a huge boost.The question for investors: Do the stocks that have benefited from these one-off boosts really offer better value now?The bull case for the AI stocks is that they are moving from a speculative trade closer to a reality where the technology makes real money.In the months up to last October, AI-related stocks -- especially suppliers to data centers -- soared in the hope of something great, pushing up valuations while earnings predictions lagged behind.In the past six months, stock prices gained little while analysts began to predict big profits. This brought their forward PE ratios back down from very expensive to be more reasonably priced. AI stocks, on this view, are proving their ability to grow into their valuations.A related way to measure PE is to adjust it for how fast a company's profits are expected to grow. Do this for the eight biggest tech and AI stocks and they were cheaper on the so-called PE-to-growth (PEG) ratio early this past week than they've been since 2013, according to Scott Chronert, head of U.S. equity strategy at Citigroup.The bear case against AI stocks is that growth hopes are still far too high, data-center projections are way ahead of reality, Big Tech has gone from being capital-light to capital-hungry, and Wall Street forecasts are little better than guesswork anyway. On top of that, it's just plain weird that the risks of the Iran war's reigniting seem to have been forgotten by equity investors.There's a middle path, neatly illustrated by Micron Technology, which makes fast-memory chips needed for AI. Soaring sales have far outstripped predictions and enabled the firm to jack up prices and profit margins. In October, the median analyst expected earnings of $19 a share in 2027. Now, they predict $101 a share. But as estimated 2027 earnings quintupled, the shares a bit more than doubled, so the PE ratio plunged.That lower valuation doesn't mean the stock is cheap. Rather, it means superhigh profits are expected to be temporary. More capacity will eventually come online, as it always does in the highly cyclical memory-chip industry, and prices will drop. Data-center demand must eventually slow, too, as needs are met.If data-center construction keeps going for years, and investors prove willing to finance it, that's great for Micron, Nvidia and other providers of the modern-day versions of picks and shovels for the AI gold rush. If AI breakthroughs reduce computing needs, or if AI adoption disappoints the high hopes of investors, it's terrible. A valuation based only on the next 12 months doesn't tell us whether to buy or sell, because a slowdown is likely only the year after, or further out.Something similar applies to how oil stocks have behaved during the Iran war. The soaring oil price as first Iran and then the U.S. prevented oil exports from the Persian Gulf naturally led to higher earnings forecasts for big oil companies. Earnings for the three oil majors 12 months ahead are expected to be about a third higher than they were at the end of February.Initially, Big Oil shares soared, as the prospect of war profits had investors salivating. But even as share prices rose, valuations were slightly down -- and this month the cease-fire led shares to slump back to where they started, even as profit forecasts rose further. The sector's forward PE has dropped from 23.8 times earnings before the war to 15.6 times.As with chip makers, a temporary boost to earnings is welcome for shareholders. But what investors really want is a rise in profit every year. Oil futures were already prepared for the price to come back down, and it fell fast on Friday on news of the Strait of Hormuz reopening -- although Iran said it was closed again on Saturday, while markets were shut.Current prices for both the AI stocks and oil are based on the market's best guess for the two themes of the moment: Data-center building and the Iran war. This has made the market look cheaper than before. But it wouldn't take much -- the AI boom's turning to bust or a peace deal in the Gulf -- to make today's cheapness look expensive in retrospect.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":2}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1832,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":617177959641272,"gmtCreate":1791657201903,"gmtModify":1791686188019,"author":{"id":"4225866006134732","authorId":"4225866006134732","name":"Hamiah","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4225866006134732","idStr":"4225866006134732"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"Share your opinion about this news…","listText":"Share your opinion about this news…","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/617177959641272","repostId":"2674865154","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2674865154","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1791630558,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2674865154?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-10-10 19:09","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2674865154","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Musk's trillioniare status means he's wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. RockefellerA rally in SpaceX and Tesla shares sen","content":"<html><head></head><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s trillioniare status means he&#39;s wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n</p>\n<p>\n     A rally in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s wealth has earned him the title of the world&#39;s first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As of Thursday, Musk&#39;s net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk&#39;s wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n</p>\n<p>\n     These positions make Musk&#39;s net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX&#39;s IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s current net worth makes him richer than the world&#39;s next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk&#39;s current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk&#39;s net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk&#39;s net worth has nearly tripled. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes&#39; 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual&#39;s peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals&#39; exact peak fortunes. Carnegie&#39;s figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n</p>\n<p>\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk&#39;s fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller&#39;s wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n</p>\n<p>\n     -Christine Ji \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\"> \n</pre>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk is Now Richer than Any American Ever - and It's not Even Close\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-10-10 19:09</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s trillioniare status means he&#39;s wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n</p>\n<p>\n     A rally in <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SPCX\">SpaceX</a> and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk&#39;s net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s wealth has earned him the title of the world&#39;s first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     As of Thursday, Musk&#39;s net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk&#39;s wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n</p>\n<p>\n     These positions make Musk&#39;s net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX&#39;s IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk&#39;s current net worth makes him richer than the world&#39;s next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk&#39;s current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk&#39;s net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk&#39;s net worth has nearly tripled. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n</p>\n<p>\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n</p>\n<p>\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes&#39; 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual&#39;s peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals&#39; exact peak fortunes. Carnegie&#39;s figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n</p>\n<p>\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk&#39;s fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n</p>\n<p>\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller&#39;s wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today&#39;s economy. \n</p>\n<p>\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n</p>\n<p>\n     -Christine Ji \n</p>\n<pre style=\"white-space: pre\"> \n</pre>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2674865154","content_text":"Musk's trillioniare status means he's wealthier than his next three contemporaries combined - and also worth more than historical tycoons like John D. Rockefeller \n\n\n     A rally in SpaceX and Tesla shares sent Elon Musk's net worth back above the trillion-dollar mark. \n\n\n     Recent gains in shares of SpaceX and Tesla have pushed Elon Musk's net worth back beyond the trillion-dollar mark. \n\n\n     Musk's wealth has earned him the title of the world's first and only trillionaire - and the richest person in the history of America by certain measures, surpassing the wealth of industrialists like John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie when looking relative to economic output. \n\n\n     As of Thursday, Musk's net worth was $1.02 trillion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The majority of Musk's wealth comes from his stakes in SpaceX (SPCX) and Tesla (TSLA), two companies with multi-trillion-dollar market capitalizations. Since the beginning of the month, shares of both companies have risen 6%. \n\n\n     Musk holds a 48.4% equity stake in SpaceX, which represents approximately 6.42 billion shares across common stock, options and unvested performance awards, according to an August SEC filing. Musk also owns 20% of Tesla, according to a June SEC filing. However, wealth calculations typically exclude the value of unvested performance shares. Musk also owns shares of his private companies Neuralink and the Boring Co. \n\n\n     These positions make Musk's net worth highly volatile. His wealth peaked at $1.32 trillion in June following SpaceX's IPO but then fell below $700 billion in August as those shares lost ground. \n\n\n     Despite these fluctuations, Musk has solidly established himself as the wealthiest person in the world, both now and compared to previous eras. \n\n\n     Musk's current net worth makes him richer than the world's next three wealthiest individuals - Google (GOOG) (GOOGL) co-founder Larry Page, Amazon.com (AMZN) founder Jeff Bezos and and Google co-founder Sergey Brin - combined. \n\n\n     Musk has spent the majority of the past five years in the top position since first overtaking Bezos in 2021. Musk's current trillionaire status is also a testament to how much the ceiling for wealth has expanded in the past few years. In 2020, Bezos became the first person to ever cross the $200 billion mark. In April 2025, Musk's net worth of $342 billion made him the wealthiest person in the world. In the 18 months since, Musk's net worth has nearly tripled. \n\n\n     Musk also remains peerless when compared to the richest Americans in history. \n\n\n     The industrialists of the 19th and 20th centuries made their fortunes on new markets like oil, steel and railroads. Today, the artificial-intelligence boom has drawn comparisons to the Industrial Revolution in terms of the transformative potential of the technology.  While the economic impact of AI has yet to fully emerge, Musk has already surpassed the richest Americans in history in terms of his relative share of gross domestic output. \n\n\n     MarketWatch identified comparable historic figures from Forbes' 2007 list of the richest Americans of all time, then calculated each individual's peak net worth as a percentage of U.S. GDP at the time. Those historical GDP shares were then applied to today's economy. \n\n\n     Note: Historical wealth estimates are approximate and may not represent individuals' exact peak fortunes. Carnegie's figure reflects proceeds from the sale of his steel business. \n\n\n     U.S. GDP reached an annualized $32.56 trillion in the second quarter ending Sept. 30. That means Musk's fortune equates to roughly 3.1% of the entire national economy - a higher percentage than any American before him. \n\n\n     Measuring historic wealth by modern-day standards is challenging because the underlying economic conditions have changed drastically. Additionally, readers should note that historical net-worth estimates are often debated due to differences in record-keeping and varying valuation methods. With that being said, economists typically measure historic wealth as a share of GDP instead of adjusting by standard consumer price inflation. \n\n\n     For example, Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller has long been considered the richest American in history. Rockefeller was worth $900 million at his peak in 1913, according to biographer Ron Chernow. Adjusted for inflation, his fortune would be worth $30.4 billion today. But when compared to U.S. GDP in 1913 - which was $39.5 billion, according to Measuring Worth - Rockefeller's wealth comprised 2.3% of total national output, or the equivalent of roughly $742 billion in today's economy. \n\n\n     Andrew Carnegie is believed to have given away $350 million, or roughly 90% of his fortune, over his lifetime. But to pinpoint his net worth at a specific point in time, MarketWatch used the 1901 buyout of Carnegie Steel to J.P Morgan as a benchmark for his peak wealth. While the exact amount is debated, PBS claims Carnegie walked away from the transaction with $250 million, earning him the title of the richest man in the world at the time. The proceeds of the sale represented 1.1% of U.S. GDP at the time, or the equivalent of $355 billion today. \n\n\n     -Christine Ji","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":1.92}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}