• 9
  • 5
  • 1

Nvidia Says It's Not Enron in Private Memo Refuting Accounting Questions

Dow Jones11-25

A series of prominent stock sales and allegations of accounting irregularities have put Nvidia in the middle of a debate about the value of artificial intelligence and its related stocks.

Now Nvidia is pushing back. In a private seven-page memo sent by Nvidia's investor relations team to Wall Street analysts over the weekend, the chip maker directly addressed a dozen claims made by skeptical investors.

Nvidia's memo, which includes fonts in the company's trademark green color, begins by addressing a social media post from Michael Burry last week, which criticized the company for stock-based compensation dilution and stock buybacks. Burry's prescient bet against subprime mortgages before the 2008-2009 financial crisis was depicted in the movie The Big Short.

"NVIDIA repurchased $91B shares since 2018, not $112.5B; Mr. Burry appears to have incorrectly included RSU [restricted stock unit] taxes. Employee equity grants should not be conflated with the performance of the repurchase program," Nvidia said in the memo. "Employees benefiting from a rising share price does not indicate the original equity grants were excessive at the time of issuance."

Barron's reviewed the memo, which initially appeared in social media posts over the weekend, and confirmed its authenticity with multiple Wall Street sources.

Burry told Barron's he disagrees with Nvidia's response and stands by his analysis. He said he would discuss the topic of the company's stock-based compensation in more detail in a future report.

Nvidia didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Nvidia also responds to claims that the "current situation is analogous to historical accounting frauds (Enron, WorldCom, Lucent) that featured vendor financing and SPVs [special purpose vehicles.)"

"NVIDIA does not resemble historical accounting frauds because NVIDIA's underlying business is economically sound, our reporting is complete and transparent, and we care about our reputation for integrity," the memo said. "Unlike Enron, NVIDIA does not use Special Purpose Entities to hide debt and inflate revenue."

Nvidia also addressed allegations that its customers -- large technology companies -- aren't properly accounting for the economic value of Nvidia hardware.

Some of the companies use a six-year depreciation schedule for graphics processing units. Burry has said he believes the useful lives of the chips are shorter than six years, meaning Nvidia's customers are inflating profits by spreading out depreciation costs over a long period.

"NVIDIA's customers depreciate GPUs over 4-6 years based on real-world longevity and utilization patterns," the company said in the memo. "Older GPUs such as A100s (released in 2020) continue to run at high utilization and generate strong contribution margins, retaining meaningful economic value well beyond the 2-3 years claimed by some commentators."

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment5

  • Djsoul80
    ·11-25
    To believe Micheal Burry believes in himself when he's just a historical figure. He should retire for good. History are not meant to be repeated otherwise what's a history?
    Reply
    Report
  • Larry.King
    ·11-25
    But if Nvidia didn't that also means what Burry says is not entirely baseless
    Reply
    Report
  • esfhh
    ·11-25
    Both have a vested interested in their respective narrative simply because they have much to lose.  At the end of day, investors should be diligent and invest in what they are familiar and knowledgeable. 
    Reply
    Report
  • Djsoul80
    ·11-25
    Jensen Huang should get a lawsuit with Michael Burry for uttering false information that causes public investors confidence with the company that may impact loss of partnership as well.
    Reply
    Report
  • DreamZ85
    ·11-25
    Nvidia should send a lawyer letter to Micheal burry since this guy is a bullshit and jealous investor which didn't not get on the early train of Nvidia. And trying to use his past knowledge to replicate on the current development of Nvidia with past companies in the dot com. 
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
 
 
 
 

Most Discussed

 
 
 
 
 

7x24