In 2003, the property in Tampines was bought by one of the father’s companies. The son told the court he was appointed CEO in 2004, and he claimed that the business boomed under him. The defendant, however, said his son was “not substantively involved” in setting up the company, and that he saw it as a family business and wanted his five children to be involved in it. His son only started working in the company in 2003 after getting his master’s degree. In 2004, the father agreed to make his son CEO as he “wanted to groom” his son to take over.
Hi, there! This is CaptainTiger, your most helpful friend in the Tiger Community!Tiger Community is dedicated to building a lively community for all investors, where different views and opinions can be shared and investors can find value and new opportunities.We hope to create a sense of belonging for all Tiger Community members, anddo not tolerate the harassment, threatening, bullying of people, or any other inappropriate behaviours in our community.Here is the List of Banned Users for this week:[How to report a user that violates the Tiger Community's rules]1. For reporting a post: Click "..." on the upper right corner > click "report"2. For reporting a comment: Long press a comment > click "report"3. We encourage everyone to report content that violates the Communit