To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
limhuileong
+Follow
Posts · 13
Posts · 13
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-25
Good time
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.20K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-22
Good luck
Blockchain firm Core Scientific to go public via $4.3 billion SPAC deal
(Reuters) -Core Scientific will go public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition compan
Blockchain firm Core Scientific to go public via $4.3 billion SPAC deal
看
1.85K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-20
Good luck
U.S. dollar, yen gain as Delta variant weighs on risk sentiment
Aussie, Canadian, NZealand dollar fall vs greenback. Sterling hits 3-month low on 'Freedom Day'. Dol
U.S. dollar, yen gain as Delta variant weighs on risk sentiment
看
2.72K
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-18
Good try
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.85K
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-17
Must try
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.63K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-16
Good luck
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.20K
回复
1
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-12
Good luck
Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion
U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu
Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion
看
1.53K
回复
1
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-12
Good luck
Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion
U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu
Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion
看
1.47K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-10
Good luck
Banks Are About to Kick Off Earnings Season. Keep an Eye on Citigroup.
Bank investors are hoping for something to get excited about this coming week when JPMorgan Chase, G
Banks Are About to Kick Off Earnings Season. Keep an Eye on Citigroup.
看
2.61K
回复
1
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
limhuileong
limhuileong
·
2021-07-10
Good luck
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.72K
回复
1
点赞
6
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574150988172179","uuid":"3574150988172179","gmtCreate":1611058084000,"gmtModify":1611058084000,"name":"limhuileong","pinyin":"limhuileong","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":236,"tweetSize":13,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.28","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.58%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.19","exceedPercentage":"93.28%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":177886304,"gmtCreate":1627195500908,"gmtModify":1703485446634,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good time","listText":"Good time","text":"Good time","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177886304","repostId":"1153219140","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2201,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":176492060,"gmtCreate":1626911244950,"gmtModify":1703480291140,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/176492060","repostId":"1137267771","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1137267771","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626877398,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1137267771?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-21 22:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Blockchain firm Core Scientific to go public via $4.3 billion SPAC deal","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1137267771","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) -Core Scientific will go public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition compan","content":"<p>(Reuters) -Core Scientific will go public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in a deal that values the blockchain infrastructure and software firm at $4.3 billion, the companies said on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>The deal with Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp will fetch $300 million in cash proceeds, Core Scientific said.</p>\n<p>Some cryptocurrency firms like Peter Thiel-backed Bullish and FTX Trading Ltd have either raised funds or have gone public at high valuations, unfazed by the waning of investor enthusiasm in cryptocurrencies and the regulatory crackdown globally.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Blockchain firm Core Scientific to go public via $4.3 billion SPAC deal</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBlockchain firm Core Scientific to go public via $4.3 billion SPAC deal\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-21 22:23</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(Reuters) -Core Scientific will go public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in a deal that values the blockchain infrastructure and software firm at $4.3 billion, the companies said on Wednesday.</p>\n<p>The deal with Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp will fetch $300 million in cash proceeds, Core Scientific said.</p>\n<p>Some cryptocurrency firms like Peter Thiel-backed Bullish and FTX Trading Ltd have either raised funds or have gone public at high valuations, unfazed by the waning of investor enthusiasm in cryptocurrencies and the regulatory crackdown globally.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1137267771","content_text":"(Reuters) -Core Scientific will go public through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in a deal that values the blockchain infrastructure and software firm at $4.3 billion, the companies said on Wednesday.\nThe deal with Power & Digital Infrastructure Acquisition Corp will fetch $300 million in cash proceeds, Core Scientific said.\nSome cryptocurrency firms like Peter Thiel-backed Bullish and FTX Trading Ltd have either raised funds or have gone public at high valuations, unfazed by the waning of investor enthusiasm in cryptocurrencies and the regulatory crackdown globally.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1852,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":171811726,"gmtCreate":1626735830165,"gmtModify":1703764038422,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/171811726","repostId":"2152659505","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2152659505","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1626706380,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2152659505?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-19 22:53","market":"uk","language":"en","title":"U.S. dollar, yen gain as Delta variant weighs on risk sentiment","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2152659505","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aussie, Canadian, NZealand dollar fall vs greenback.\nSterling hits 3-month low on 'Freedom Day'.\nDol","content":"<ul>\n <li>Aussie, Canadian, NZealand dollar fall vs greenback.</li>\n <li>Sterling hits 3-month low on 'Freedom Day'.</li>\n <li>Dollar supported by risk aversion.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>NEW YORK/LONDON, July 19 (Reuters) - The safe-haven U.S. dollar, yen, and Swiss franc rose on Monday as investors grew nervous about a raging coronavirus variant that could threaten the outlook for global economic recovery.</p>\n<p>The greenback climbed to a more than three-month peak against a basket of major currencies, but has come off its highs as the yen and Swiss franc advanced with the decline in risk appetite.</p>\n<p>The U.S. dollar though remained sharply higher against risk-sensitive currencies such as the Australian, Canadian, and New Zealand dollars.</p>\n<p>The yen, meanwhile, climbed to its highest in 1-1/2 months versus the dollar.</p>\n<p>The Delta variant of COVID-19 is now the dominant strain worldwide, accompanied by a surge of deaths around the United States almost entirely among unvaccinated people, U.S. officials said on Friday.</p>\n<p>U.S. cases of COVID-19 are up 70% over the previous week and deaths are up 26%, with outbreaks occurring in parts of the country with low vaccination rates, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said during a press briefing.</p>\n<p>\"The Delta variant concerns are triggering this flight to safety across the world,\" said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at online FX trading platform OANDA in New York. \"There's just this tremendous amount of nervousness, which is good for the dollar and the Japanese yen.\"</p>\n<p>In mid-morning trading, the dollar index, which measures its value against six major currencies, rose to its highest since April 5. But it was last flat on the day at 92.655 .</p>\n<p>The dollar was firmly higher against commodity currencies. It rose 1% against the Canadian dollar to C$1.2752 . The Aussie dollar dropped 0.7% versus the greenback to US$0.7343 , while the New Zealand dollar fell 0.8% to US$0.6940 .</p>\n<p>The yen surged on Monday, rising to its highest since late May against the greenback, which was last down 0.8% at 109.16 yen</p>\n<p>The Swiss franc gained as well, pushing the dollar down 0.3% to 0.9171 franc</p>\n<p>With England lifting all COVID-19 social restrictions on what some local media has dubbed \"Freedom Day\", the continued spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus drew further doubt from investors about whether a total economic recovery to pre-pandemic levels is possible.</p>\n<p>Over the weekend, British health minister Sajid Javid announced he had tested positive for COVID-19 and was in self-isolation, also forcing Prime Minister Boris Johnson and finance minister Rishi Sunak into quarantine. Sterling hit a 3-month low against the dollar of $1.3703.</p>\n<p>The pound was last down 0.4% at $1.3694.</p>\n<p>The euro was little changed against the dollar at $1.1810 , after earlier dropping to a three-month low of $1.1764. Investors will look to this week's European Central Bank meeting.</p>\n<p>========================================================</p>\n<p>Currency bid prices at 10:13AM (1413 GMT)</p>\n<p>Description RIC Last U.S. Close Pct Change YTD Pct High Bid Low Bid</p>\n<p>Previous Change</p>\n<p>Session</p>\n<p>Dollar index 92.7110 92.6590 +0.07% 3.034% +93.0410 +92.6270</p>\n<p>Euro/Dollar $1.1814 $1.1805 +0.08% -3.30% +$1.1824 +$1.1764</p>\n<p>Dollar/Yen 109.2050 110.0800 -0.78% +5.71% +110.0950 +109.0700</p>\n<p>Euro/Yen 129.01 129.96 -0.73% +1.65% +129.9700 +128.9000</p>\n<p>Dollar/Swiss 0.9171 0.9197 -0.24% +3.70% +0.9221 +0.9164</p>\n<p>Sterling/Dollar $1.3696 $1.3764 -0.48% +0.26% +$1.3767 +$1.3690</p>\n<p>Dollar/Canadian 1.2770 1.2621 +1.24% +0.34% +1.2807 +1.2614</p>\n<p>Aussie/Dollar $0.7337 $0.7401 -0.86% -4.62% +$0.7403 +$0.7329</p>\n<p>Euro/Swiss 1.0833 1.0852 -0.18% +0.24% +1.0862 +1.0830</p>\n<p>Euro/Sterling 0.8626 0.8572 +0.63% -3.48% +0.8627 +0.8565</p>\n<p>NZ $0.6937 $0.7000 -0.93% -3.43% +$0.7004 +$0.6922</p>\n<p>Dollar/Dollar</p>\n<p>Dollar/Norway 8.9300 8.8575 +0.96% +4.14% +8.9615 +8.8695</p>\n<p>Euro/Norway 10.5500 10.4553 +0.91% +0.81% +10.5710 +10.4225</p>\n<p>Dollar/Sweden 8.6769 8.6755 +0.04% +5.86% +8.7271 +8.6692</p>\n<p>Euro/Sweden 10.2512 10.2466 +0.04% +1.73% +10.2691 +10.2448</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss in New York and Ritvik Carvalho in London; Editing by William Maclean and Andrea Ricci)</p>\n<p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. dollar, yen gain as Delta variant weighs on risk sentiment</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. dollar, yen gain as Delta variant weighs on risk sentiment\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-19 22:53</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Aussie, Canadian, NZealand dollar fall vs greenback.</li>\n <li>Sterling hits 3-month low on 'Freedom Day'.</li>\n <li>Dollar supported by risk aversion.</li>\n</ul>\n<p>NEW YORK/LONDON, July 19 (Reuters) - The safe-haven U.S. dollar, yen, and Swiss franc rose on Monday as investors grew nervous about a raging coronavirus variant that could threaten the outlook for global economic recovery.</p>\n<p>The greenback climbed to a more than three-month peak against a basket of major currencies, but has come off its highs as the yen and Swiss franc advanced with the decline in risk appetite.</p>\n<p>The U.S. dollar though remained sharply higher against risk-sensitive currencies such as the Australian, Canadian, and New Zealand dollars.</p>\n<p>The yen, meanwhile, climbed to its highest in 1-1/2 months versus the dollar.</p>\n<p>The Delta variant of COVID-19 is now the dominant strain worldwide, accompanied by a surge of deaths around the United States almost entirely among unvaccinated people, U.S. officials said on Friday.</p>\n<p>U.S. cases of COVID-19 are up 70% over the previous week and deaths are up 26%, with outbreaks occurring in parts of the country with low vaccination rates, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said during a press briefing.</p>\n<p>\"The Delta variant concerns are triggering this flight to safety across the world,\" said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at online FX trading platform OANDA in New York. \"There's just this tremendous amount of nervousness, which is good for the dollar and the Japanese yen.\"</p>\n<p>In mid-morning trading, the dollar index, which measures its value against six major currencies, rose to its highest since April 5. But it was last flat on the day at 92.655 .</p>\n<p>The dollar was firmly higher against commodity currencies. It rose 1% against the Canadian dollar to C$1.2752 . The Aussie dollar dropped 0.7% versus the greenback to US$0.7343 , while the New Zealand dollar fell 0.8% to US$0.6940 .</p>\n<p>The yen surged on Monday, rising to its highest since late May against the greenback, which was last down 0.8% at 109.16 yen</p>\n<p>The Swiss franc gained as well, pushing the dollar down 0.3% to 0.9171 franc</p>\n<p>With England lifting all COVID-19 social restrictions on what some local media has dubbed \"Freedom Day\", the continued spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus drew further doubt from investors about whether a total economic recovery to pre-pandemic levels is possible.</p>\n<p>Over the weekend, British health minister Sajid Javid announced he had tested positive for COVID-19 and was in self-isolation, also forcing Prime Minister Boris Johnson and finance minister Rishi Sunak into quarantine. Sterling hit a 3-month low against the dollar of $1.3703.</p>\n<p>The pound was last down 0.4% at $1.3694.</p>\n<p>The euro was little changed against the dollar at $1.1810 , after earlier dropping to a three-month low of $1.1764. Investors will look to this week's European Central Bank meeting.</p>\n<p>========================================================</p>\n<p>Currency bid prices at 10:13AM (1413 GMT)</p>\n<p>Description RIC Last U.S. Close Pct Change YTD Pct High Bid Low Bid</p>\n<p>Previous Change</p>\n<p>Session</p>\n<p>Dollar index 92.7110 92.6590 +0.07% 3.034% +93.0410 +92.6270</p>\n<p>Euro/Dollar $1.1814 $1.1805 +0.08% -3.30% +$1.1824 +$1.1764</p>\n<p>Dollar/Yen 109.2050 110.0800 -0.78% +5.71% +110.0950 +109.0700</p>\n<p>Euro/Yen 129.01 129.96 -0.73% +1.65% +129.9700 +128.9000</p>\n<p>Dollar/Swiss 0.9171 0.9197 -0.24% +3.70% +0.9221 +0.9164</p>\n<p>Sterling/Dollar $1.3696 $1.3764 -0.48% +0.26% +$1.3767 +$1.3690</p>\n<p>Dollar/Canadian 1.2770 1.2621 +1.24% +0.34% +1.2807 +1.2614</p>\n<p>Aussie/Dollar $0.7337 $0.7401 -0.86% -4.62% +$0.7403 +$0.7329</p>\n<p>Euro/Swiss 1.0833 1.0852 -0.18% +0.24% +1.0862 +1.0830</p>\n<p>Euro/Sterling 0.8626 0.8572 +0.63% -3.48% +0.8627 +0.8565</p>\n<p>NZ $0.6937 $0.7000 -0.93% -3.43% +$0.7004 +$0.6922</p>\n<p>Dollar/Dollar</p>\n<p>Dollar/Norway 8.9300 8.8575 +0.96% +4.14% +8.9615 +8.8695</p>\n<p>Euro/Norway 10.5500 10.4553 +0.91% +0.81% +10.5710 +10.4225</p>\n<p>Dollar/Sweden 8.6769 8.6755 +0.04% +5.86% +8.7271 +8.6692</p>\n<p>Euro/Sweden 10.2512 10.2466 +0.04% +1.73% +10.2691 +10.2448</p>\n<p>(Reporting by Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss in New York and Ritvik Carvalho in London; Editing by William Maclean and Andrea Ricci)</p>\n<p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"FXY":"日元ETF-CurrencyShares","FXC":"加元ETF-CurrencyShares","FXA":"澳元ETF-CurrencyShares","FXE":"欧元做多ETF-CurrencyShares","EUO":"欧元ETF-ProShares两倍做空","YCS":"日元ETF-ProShares两倍做空"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2152659505","content_text":"Aussie, Canadian, NZealand dollar fall vs greenback.\nSterling hits 3-month low on 'Freedom Day'.\nDollar supported by risk aversion.\n\nNEW YORK/LONDON, July 19 (Reuters) - The safe-haven U.S. dollar, yen, and Swiss franc rose on Monday as investors grew nervous about a raging coronavirus variant that could threaten the outlook for global economic recovery.\nThe greenback climbed to a more than three-month peak against a basket of major currencies, but has come off its highs as the yen and Swiss franc advanced with the decline in risk appetite.\nThe U.S. dollar though remained sharply higher against risk-sensitive currencies such as the Australian, Canadian, and New Zealand dollars.\nThe yen, meanwhile, climbed to its highest in 1-1/2 months versus the dollar.\nThe Delta variant of COVID-19 is now the dominant strain worldwide, accompanied by a surge of deaths around the United States almost entirely among unvaccinated people, U.S. officials said on Friday.\nU.S. cases of COVID-19 are up 70% over the previous week and deaths are up 26%, with outbreaks occurring in parts of the country with low vaccination rates, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walensky said during a press briefing.\n\"The Delta variant concerns are triggering this flight to safety across the world,\" said Edward Moya, senior market analyst at online FX trading platform OANDA in New York. \"There's just this tremendous amount of nervousness, which is good for the dollar and the Japanese yen.\"\nIn mid-morning trading, the dollar index, which measures its value against six major currencies, rose to its highest since April 5. But it was last flat on the day at 92.655 .\nThe dollar was firmly higher against commodity currencies. It rose 1% against the Canadian dollar to C$1.2752 . The Aussie dollar dropped 0.7% versus the greenback to US$0.7343 , while the New Zealand dollar fell 0.8% to US$0.6940 .\nThe yen surged on Monday, rising to its highest since late May against the greenback, which was last down 0.8% at 109.16 yen\nThe Swiss franc gained as well, pushing the dollar down 0.3% to 0.9171 franc\nWith England lifting all COVID-19 social restrictions on what some local media has dubbed \"Freedom Day\", the continued spread of the Delta variant of the coronavirus drew further doubt from investors about whether a total economic recovery to pre-pandemic levels is possible.\nOver the weekend, British health minister Sajid Javid announced he had tested positive for COVID-19 and was in self-isolation, also forcing Prime Minister Boris Johnson and finance minister Rishi Sunak into quarantine. Sterling hit a 3-month low against the dollar of $1.3703.\nThe pound was last down 0.4% at $1.3694.\nThe euro was little changed against the dollar at $1.1810 , after earlier dropping to a three-month low of $1.1764. Investors will look to this week's European Central Bank meeting.\n========================================================\nCurrency bid prices at 10:13AM (1413 GMT)\nDescription RIC Last U.S. Close Pct Change YTD Pct High Bid Low Bid\nPrevious Change\nSession\nDollar index 92.7110 92.6590 +0.07% 3.034% +93.0410 +92.6270\nEuro/Dollar $1.1814 $1.1805 +0.08% -3.30% +$1.1824 +$1.1764\nDollar/Yen 109.2050 110.0800 -0.78% +5.71% +110.0950 +109.0700\nEuro/Yen 129.01 129.96 -0.73% +1.65% +129.9700 +128.9000\nDollar/Swiss 0.9171 0.9197 -0.24% +3.70% +0.9221 +0.9164\nSterling/Dollar $1.3696 $1.3764 -0.48% +0.26% +$1.3767 +$1.3690\nDollar/Canadian 1.2770 1.2621 +1.24% +0.34% +1.2807 +1.2614\nAussie/Dollar $0.7337 $0.7401 -0.86% -4.62% +$0.7403 +$0.7329\nEuro/Swiss 1.0833 1.0852 -0.18% +0.24% +1.0862 +1.0830\nEuro/Sterling 0.8626 0.8572 +0.63% -3.48% +0.8627 +0.8565\nNZ $0.6937 $0.7000 -0.93% -3.43% +$0.7004 +$0.6922\nDollar/Dollar\nDollar/Norway 8.9300 8.8575 +0.96% +4.14% +8.9615 +8.8695\nEuro/Norway 10.5500 10.4553 +0.91% +0.81% +10.5710 +10.4225\nDollar/Sweden 8.6769 8.6755 +0.04% +5.86% +8.7271 +8.6692\nEuro/Sweden 10.2512 10.2466 +0.04% +1.73% +10.2691 +10.2448\n(Reporting by Gertrude Chavez-Dreyfuss in New York and Ritvik Carvalho in London; Editing by William Maclean and Andrea Ricci)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"JPYmain":0.9,"FXE":0.9,"AUDmain":0.9,"FXC":0.9,"FXY":0.9,"EURmain":0.9,"YCS":0.9,"CADmain":0.9,"MEURmain":0.9,"EUO":0.9,"MAUDmain":0.9,"FXA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2721,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179580455,"gmtCreate":1626563667777,"gmtModify":1703761658400,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good try","listText":"Good try","text":"Good try","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179580455","repostId":"2152899486","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1849,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":179025800,"gmtCreate":1626476796000,"gmtModify":1703760708681,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Must try","listText":"Must try","text":"Must try","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/179025800","repostId":"2151892500","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1626,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":147701217,"gmtCreate":1626389708039,"gmtModify":1703759044081,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/147701217","repostId":"2151758075","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2202,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146317084,"gmtCreate":1626053735148,"gmtModify":1703752391207,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146317084","repostId":"1131667592","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MCLmain":0.9,"BZmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1526,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":146314360,"gmtCreate":1626053685450,"gmtModify":1703752390214,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/146314360","repostId":"1131667592","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1131667592","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626053253,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1131667592?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-12 09:27","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1131667592","media":"zerohedge","summary":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than cu","content":"<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.</p>\n<p>According to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,<b>U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/009bd7695d2283b71ea9977be94749cb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"664\"></p>\n<p>For the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,<b>this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.</b></p>\n<p>This, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”</b></i>Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n <b>“Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”</b>\n</blockquote>\n<p>Meanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.</p>\n<p>After a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.</p>\n<blockquote>\n <i><b>\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"</b></i>one industry executive told Reuters.\n</blockquote>\n<p>Shareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Poor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPoor Hedging Could Cost U.S. Shale $20 Billion\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-12 09:27 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/poor-hedging-could-cost-us-shale-20-billion","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1131667592","content_text":"U.S. shale oil producers have suffered billions in losses from hedging their output at lower than current prices, the Financial Timesreported today, citing data from IHS Markit.\nAccording to the consultancy, even though crude oil is trading at over $70 per barrel right now,U.S. shale producers are selling their barrels for an average of $55 because that’s the price they hedged their future sales at.\n\nFor the first half of the year, IHS Markit says, losses have reached $7.5 billion but if oil prices remained around $75 per barrel,this could add another $12 billion during the second half of the year as demand continues improving.\nThis, the report notes, could give OPEC more pricing power: because of their badly miscalculated hedging, U.S. shale oil producers are unlikely start boosting production in any major way anytime soon. As a result, OPEC can do pretty much what it wants with its own production and push prices however high it wants.\n\n“Opec gets a pass to keep lifting prices right now if it wants to, without fearing much of a US supply response,”Bill Farren-Price, an analyst at Enverus, told the FT.\n “Shale producers are locked into selling their oil cheaply this year.”\n\nMeanwhile, U.S. shale producers have become wary of hedging, according to a Reuters report from earlier this week.\nAfter a surge in hedging in June, the report noted, companies have now retreated and adopted a wait-and-see attitude, not least because of bullish forecasts on oil prices.\n\n\"With every bank saying that oil will be at $90-$100, no one is going to put hedges on right now,\"one industry executive told Reuters.\n\nShareholders are sceptical of the benefits of hedging, too, Reuters reports, citing analysts. In fact, shareholders would rather companies ramped up production than hedging, which is acting as a deterrent factor, too. Still, some shale producers are hedging more, although these are a small minority.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MCLmain":0.9,"BZmain":0.9,"CLmain":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1471,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148995872,"gmtCreate":1625911174996,"gmtModify":1703750830476,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148995872","repostId":"1101087642","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101087642","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1625885700,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101087642?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-10 10:55","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Banks Are About to Kick Off Earnings Season. Keep an Eye on Citigroup.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101087642","media":"Barrons","summary":"Bank investors are hoping for something to get excited about this coming week when JPMorgan Chase, G","content":"<p>Bank investors are hoping for something to get excited about this coming week when JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs Group, and others report second-quarter results. They shouldn’t get their hopes up.</p>\n<p>It’s not that there hasn’t been good news for bank stocks. Just last month, the biggest banks easily passed the Federal Reserve’s annual stress tests, paving the way for them to return capital to shareholders without restrictions. They’ve also gotten a lift from improving economic conditions, the release of reserves set aside for bad loans that never materialized, and continued trading and deal-making activity. Banks have controlled what they can control and have come out the other side better for it.</p>\n<p>But there’s one thing banks can’t control—bond yields. The SPDR S&P Bank exchange-traded fund (ticker: KBE) gained around 30% to start the year as the 10-year yield climbed as high as 1.75%. The ETF has given back about half its gains as the 10-year yield dropped below 1.3% this past week. While bank earnings should contain a lot of good news, there may not be enough to get the group moving higher. In fact, the opposite might be true.</p>\n<p>Banks have proven they have a solid foundation, but the next leg of growth is more uncertain. Few expect that trading activity—which soared last year amid volatile market conditions—will match last year’s torrid pace. Across the sector, second-quarter trading revenue likely declined by roughly 30% year over year. Expectations of reserve releases and capital return to shareholders have already been priced into the shares.As for loan growth, expectations are weak as loan activity has likely been muted.</p>\n<p>Bank stocks aren’t nearly as cheap as they were a year ago, when many were trading below tangible book value, but compared with the broad market, they still look cheap. The SPDR S&P Bank ETF currently trades at 11.1 times 12-month forward earnings, while the S&P 500 trades at 21.6 times.</p>\n<p>Against this backdrop, with banks strong but perhaps not as exciting and certainly not as cheap, few are as cheap as Citigroup(C), which trades at just 0.9 times tangible book and offers a 3% yield after falling 13% over the past month. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect that Citigroup will earn $1.99 per share—roughly a fourfold increase from the challenging year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>Barron’s highlighted Citigroup earlier this year just as Jane Fraser was poised to become CEO. Prior to Fraser claiming the top spot, the bank was hit with a consent order by regulators for weaknesses in its internal controls. While there has been some analyst skepticism about how quickly Citigroup can correct those issues and at what cost, the Street generally agrees that with Fraser at the helm, the bank has a renewed sense of urgency to streamline its operations.</p>\n<p>Citi’s cheap valuation makes up for a lot of those issues, says KBW analyst David Konrad. “We are assuming coverage of Citigroup with an Outperform rating partly due to a discounted valuation but also due to the negative sentiment on the stock,” he writes. Konrad sees Citi stock trading at $85 a share, almost 25% above Friday’s close.</p>\n<p>It may take time, but Citi stock should pay off for patient investors.</p>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Banks Are About to Kick Off Earnings Season. Keep an Eye on Citigroup.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBanks Are About to Kick Off Earnings Season. Keep an Eye on Citigroup.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-10 10:55 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/citigroup-bank-stocks-earnings-season-51625876082?mod=RTA><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bank investors are hoping for something to get excited about this coming week when JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs Group, and others report second-quarter results. They shouldn’t get their hopes up.\nIt’...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/citigroup-bank-stocks-earnings-season-51625876082?mod=RTA\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"C":"花旗"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/citigroup-bank-stocks-earnings-season-51625876082?mod=RTA","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101087642","content_text":"Bank investors are hoping for something to get excited about this coming week when JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs Group, and others report second-quarter results. They shouldn’t get their hopes up.\nIt’s not that there hasn’t been good news for bank stocks. Just last month, the biggest banks easily passed the Federal Reserve’s annual stress tests, paving the way for them to return capital to shareholders without restrictions. They’ve also gotten a lift from improving economic conditions, the release of reserves set aside for bad loans that never materialized, and continued trading and deal-making activity. Banks have controlled what they can control and have come out the other side better for it.\nBut there’s one thing banks can’t control—bond yields. The SPDR S&P Bank exchange-traded fund (ticker: KBE) gained around 30% to start the year as the 10-year yield climbed as high as 1.75%. The ETF has given back about half its gains as the 10-year yield dropped below 1.3% this past week. While bank earnings should contain a lot of good news, there may not be enough to get the group moving higher. In fact, the opposite might be true.\nBanks have proven they have a solid foundation, but the next leg of growth is more uncertain. Few expect that trading activity—which soared last year amid volatile market conditions—will match last year’s torrid pace. Across the sector, second-quarter trading revenue likely declined by roughly 30% year over year. Expectations of reserve releases and capital return to shareholders have already been priced into the shares.As for loan growth, expectations are weak as loan activity has likely been muted.\nBank stocks aren’t nearly as cheap as they were a year ago, when many were trading below tangible book value, but compared with the broad market, they still look cheap. The SPDR S&P Bank ETF currently trades at 11.1 times 12-month forward earnings, while the S&P 500 trades at 21.6 times.\nAgainst this backdrop, with banks strong but perhaps not as exciting and certainly not as cheap, few are as cheap as Citigroup(C), which trades at just 0.9 times tangible book and offers a 3% yield after falling 13% over the past month. Analysts surveyed by FactSet expect that Citigroup will earn $1.99 per share—roughly a fourfold increase from the challenging year-ago quarter.\nBarron’s highlighted Citigroup earlier this year just as Jane Fraser was poised to become CEO. Prior to Fraser claiming the top spot, the bank was hit with a consent order by regulators for weaknesses in its internal controls. While there has been some analyst skepticism about how quickly Citigroup can correct those issues and at what cost, the Street generally agrees that with Fraser at the helm, the bank has a renewed sense of urgency to streamline its operations.\nCiti’s cheap valuation makes up for a lot of those issues, says KBW analyst David Konrad. “We are assuming coverage of Citigroup with an Outperform rating partly due to a discounted valuation but also due to the negative sentiment on the stock,” he writes. Konrad sees Citi stock trading at $85 a share, almost 25% above Friday’s close.\nIt may take time, but Citi stock should pay off for patient investors.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"C":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2607,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":148992253,"gmtCreate":1625911028172,"gmtModify":1703750829499,"author":{"id":"3574150988172179","authorId":"3574150988172179","name":"limhuileong","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574150988172179","idStr":"3574150988172179"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/148992253","repostId":"2150370120","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2718,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}