Share your opinion about this

1
Comment
Favorite

Share your opinion about this news…

As Netflix Swoops In to Buy Warner Bros., We Revisit the Studio’s Long, Twisted Journey

Like all the old Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. has taken a twisted path into the present, filled with mergers and acquisitions.

As Netflix Swoops In to Buy Warner Bros., We Revisit the Studio’s Long, Twisted Journey

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":508512351220368,"tweetId":"508512351220368","gmtCreate":1765170335380,"gmtModify":1765172308957,"author":{"id":4097734155216680,"idStr":"4097734155216680","authorId":4097734155216680,"authorIdStr":"4097734155216680","name":"azam.a","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ad35c4d99135e1f172a209f9042b94d","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":0,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Share your opinion about this news…</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Share your opinion about this news…</p></body></html>","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/508512351220368","repostId":2589829494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2589829494","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1765164600,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2589829494?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-12-08 11:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"As Netflix Swoops In to Buy Warner Bros., We Revisit the Studio’s Long, Twisted Journey","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2589829494","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Like all the old Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. has taken a twisted path into the present, filled with mergers and acquisitions.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Like all the old Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. has taken a twisted path into the present, filled with mergers and acquisitions—the latest a proposed sale to Netflix for $82.7 billion, including assumed debt. Some have worked out well and some haven’t, but the good ones are all long in the rearview mirror.</p><p>The 1950s heralded the end of the studio system of Hollywood’s Golden Era. The studios began to see competition from television, and they lost their theater chains to antitrust action by the U.S. Department of Justice. In dire need of cash, Warner Bros. made one of the worst media deals of all time in 1956, selling off its entire pre-1948 film library just as TV stations were about to need those old movies and cartoons to fill their schedules.</p><p>Like many studios, Warner was adrift for years. As U.S. culture changed in the 1960s, Warner and the other studios had trouble keeping up, and that was the last straw.</p><p>In 1967 an aging Jack Warner still owned a controlling interest in the studio and sold it to a film distribution company named Seven Arts to form Warner Bros.-Seven Arts. But Seven Arts had bitten off more than it could chew. After a string of flops in 1968 and 1969, the company was sold to Steve Ross’s Kinney National, which owned mortuaries, parking lots, and other decidedly nonentertainment businesses. The studio was re-christened again, this time as Warner Communications.</p><p>Thus began the best years for Warner both financially and creatively since the 1930s. It had production and distribution for film, television and music as these were all burgeoning in the 1970s. In 1990 it added publishing with Time Inc. It also brought a cable television system that combined with Warner’s to create one of the largest systems in the U.S., just as cable TV was about to boom. The new company was called Time Warner.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The 1996 addition of Turner Broadcasting brought cable channels, the pre-1986 MGM film library, a plethora of cartoons, and the return of the pre-1948 Warner library, bringing <em>Casablanca</em> and Bugs Bunny back home.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Though there was reported friction between the button-down publishers at Time and the laid-back Hollywood scene, the 1990s were peak Warner. The film studio pumped out hits and was finding new distribution channels internationally and with home video. Stuffed with ad pages, it was a high point for magazine publishing. The TV studio produced many of the top shows on U.S. television, including <em>Seinfeld</em>, <em>Friends</em>, and <em>ER</em>, all of which are still raking in cash today. The WB broadcast network started up. Cable subscriptions were expanding. CNN set the standard for television news, and the Turner networks added sports. Warner/Elektra/Atlantic was the largest distributor of music in the industry’s best decade.</p><p>But like Warner’s first golden era, this one also ended with a new medium: the internet. Old-media companies were justifiably concerned that it would disrupt their businesses, and with hindsight we know they were right to be scared. Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin thought the answer was another merger, this time with the premier internet service at a time when dial-up connections were still king—America Online. Despite being the smaller company, AOL was valued more highly than Time Warner in the 2001 all-stock deal that formed AOL-Time Warner.</p><p>This was a disastrous hookup of old and new media. The promised “synergies” never materialized. The World Wide Web overtook AOL’s walled-garden model of the internet. Most important, the timing couldn’t have been worse, with the deal being announced two months before the dot-com crash. Eventually, $99 billion of the $165 billion merger was written down. AOL was just sold in October for a reported $1.4 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The merger strategy that had been so successful for 30 years fell flat on its face, and since then, Warner has faced another long period of struggle.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In 2018, with many parts severed from Warner like AOL and Time Warner Cable, AT&amp;T bought the studio, renaming it WarnerMedia. But just three years later it saw the strategic error of larding on $44 billion in debt (including assumed debt) to buy Warner’s flagging properties. By 2022, AT&amp;T had merged it with Discovery’s cable channels and spun it off asWarner Bros. Discovery—a pastiche of old media—which it remains today.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Every media merger is different, but among these episodes the Netflix-Warner hookup most closely resembles the Seven Arts deal. Like Netflix, Seven Arts began as distribution for a new medium, in this case TV. Seven Arts bought TV rights from studios and packaged them together to sell to TV stations. Like Netflix, Seven Arts started making its own content when the studios weren’t producing enough. And like Netflix, it turned to acquiring a distressed old media company to add more content and production.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This doesn’t mean the Netflix-Warner deal is doomed, but it highlights the integration challenges to Netflix as it brings in a sprawling old-media company.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>As Netflix Swoops In to Buy Warner Bros., We Revisit the Studio’s Long, Twisted Journey</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAs Netflix Swoops In to Buy Warner Bros., We Revisit the Studio’s Long, Twisted Journey\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-12-08 11:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Like all the old Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. has taken a twisted path into the present, filled with mergers and acquisitions—the latest a proposed sale to Netflix for $82.7 billion, including assumed debt. Some have worked out well and some haven’t, but the good ones are all long in the rearview mirror.</p><p>The 1950s heralded the end of the studio system of Hollywood’s Golden Era. The studios began to see competition from television, and they lost their theater chains to antitrust action by the U.S. Department of Justice. In dire need of cash, Warner Bros. made one of the worst media deals of all time in 1956, selling off its entire pre-1948 film library just as TV stations were about to need those old movies and cartoons to fill their schedules.</p><p>Like many studios, Warner was adrift for years. As U.S. culture changed in the 1960s, Warner and the other studios had trouble keeping up, and that was the last straw.</p><p>In 1967 an aging Jack Warner still owned a controlling interest in the studio and sold it to a film distribution company named Seven Arts to form Warner Bros.-Seven Arts. But Seven Arts had bitten off more than it could chew. After a string of flops in 1968 and 1969, the company was sold to Steve Ross’s Kinney National, which owned mortuaries, parking lots, and other decidedly nonentertainment businesses. The studio was re-christened again, this time as Warner Communications.</p><p>Thus began the best years for Warner both financially and creatively since the 1930s. It had production and distribution for film, television and music as these were all burgeoning in the 1970s. In 1990 it added publishing with Time Inc. It also brought a cable television system that combined with Warner’s to create one of the largest systems in the U.S., just as cable TV was about to boom. The new company was called Time Warner.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The 1996 addition of Turner Broadcasting brought cable channels, the pre-1986 MGM film library, a plethora of cartoons, and the return of the pre-1948 Warner library, bringing <em>Casablanca</em> and Bugs Bunny back home.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Though there was reported friction between the button-down publishers at Time and the laid-back Hollywood scene, the 1990s were peak Warner. The film studio pumped out hits and was finding new distribution channels internationally and with home video. Stuffed with ad pages, it was a high point for magazine publishing. The TV studio produced many of the top shows on U.S. television, including <em>Seinfeld</em>, <em>Friends</em>, and <em>ER</em>, all of which are still raking in cash today. The WB broadcast network started up. Cable subscriptions were expanding. CNN set the standard for television news, and the Turner networks added sports. Warner/Elektra/Atlantic was the largest distributor of music in the industry’s best decade.</p><p>But like Warner’s first golden era, this one also ended with a new medium: the internet. Old-media companies were justifiably concerned that it would disrupt their businesses, and with hindsight we know they were right to be scared. Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin thought the answer was another merger, this time with the premier internet service at a time when dial-up connections were still king—America Online. Despite being the smaller company, AOL was valued more highly than Time Warner in the 2001 all-stock deal that formed AOL-Time Warner.</p><p>This was a disastrous hookup of old and new media. The promised “synergies” never materialized. The World Wide Web overtook AOL’s walled-garden model of the internet. Most important, the timing couldn’t have been worse, with the deal being announced two months before the dot-com crash. Eventually, $99 billion of the $165 billion merger was written down. AOL was just sold in October for a reported $1.4 billion.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The merger strategy that had been so successful for 30 years fell flat on its face, and since then, Warner has faced another long period of struggle.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">In 2018, with many parts severed from Warner like AOL and Time Warner Cable, AT&amp;T bought the studio, renaming it WarnerMedia. But just three years later it saw the strategic error of larding on $44 billion in debt (including assumed debt) to buy Warner’s flagging properties. By 2022, AT&amp;T had merged it with Discovery’s cable channels and spun it off asWarner Bros. Discovery—a pastiche of old media—which it remains today.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">Every media merger is different, but among these episodes the Netflix-Warner hookup most closely resembles the Seven Arts deal. Like Netflix, Seven Arts began as distribution for a new medium, in this case TV. Seven Arts bought TV rights from studios and packaged them together to sell to TV stations. Like Netflix, Seven Arts started making its own content when the studios weren’t producing enough. And like Netflix, it turned to acquiring a distressed old media company to add more content and production.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">This doesn’t mean the Netflix-Warner deal is doomed, but it highlights the integration challenges to Netflix as it brings in a sprawling old-media company.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1316542783.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD","SGXZ51526630.SGD":"大华环球创新基金A Acc SGD","LU0106261372.USD":"SCHRODER ISF US LARGE CAP \"A\" ACC","LU2326559502.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity P/A SGD-H","BK4566":"资本集团","IE00BSNM7G36.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN SYSTEMATIC GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE VALUE \"A\" (USD) ACC","IE00BKPKM429.USD":"NEUBERGER BERMAN GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1778281490.HKD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (HKD) INC","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0203202063.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A2X\" (USD) ACC","IE00BZ1G4Q59.USD":"LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE US EQUITY SUSTAINABILITY LEADER \"A\"(USD) INC (A)","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU0077335932.USD":"FIDELITY AMERICAN GROWTH \"A\" INC","LU1035775433.USD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU0203201768.USD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"AX\" (USD) INC","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","LU2362540622.SGD":"WELLINGTON NEXT GENERATION GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4524":"宅经济概念","LU0417517546.SGD":"Allianz US Equity Cl AT Acc SGD","BK4527":"明星科技股","LU0149725797.USD":"汇丰美国股市经济规模基金","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU1127390331.HKD":"AB SICAV I - ALL MARKET INCOME PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2361044949.HKD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0882574139.USD":"富达环球消费行业基金A ACC","WBD":"WARNER BROS DISCOVERY INC","LU1201861249.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity PA SGD-H","LU2361044865.SGD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","IE00BQXX3D17.EUR":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (EUR) ACC","LU0980610538.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD-H","IE00BQXX3C00.GBP":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (GBP) ACC","LU0648001328.SGD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA SGD","LU2361045086.USD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0868494617.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1046421795.USD":"富达环球科技A-ACC","IE00BQXX3F31.USD":"GUINNESS GLOBAL INNOVATORS \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU2108987350.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV GLOBAL OPPORTUNITY SUSTAINABLE (USD) \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0127658192.USD":"EASTSPRING INVESTMENTS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1621767737.EUR":"AZ EQUITY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"AAZ\" (EUR) ACC","LU2362541273.HKD":"WELLINGTON NEXT GENERATION GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0496365809.HKD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (HKD) INC (Q)","LU1621767810.EUR":"AZ EQUITY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"A\" (EUR) INC","LU2362541513.USD":"WELLINGTON NEXT GENERATION GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1989764664.SGD":"CPR Invest - Global Disruptive Opportunities A2 Acc SGD-H","LU1621768115.EUR":"AZ EQUITY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"B\" (EUR) INC","LU2357305700.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence ET H2-SGD","LU1267930730.SGD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金AS Acc SGD (CPF)","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","SGXZ23171101.USD":"NIKKO AM SHENTON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES (USD) ACC","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","BK4581":"高盛持仓","LU0976567544.SGD":"FTIF - Templeton Global Income A Mdis SGD-H1","LU1366192091.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY PLUS \"AM\" (USD) INC","IE00B19Z8W00.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH \"A\" INC","LU0256863902.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"AT\" (USD) ACC","LU2461242641.AUD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","LU0215105999.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY \"A\" ACC","LU0868494708.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) INC","LU2860962120.EUR":"CPR INVEST - ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"A2\" (EUR) ACC A","LU0225283273.USD":"SCHRODER ISF GLOBAL EQUITY ALPHA \"A\" (USD) ACC","SG9999004303.SGD":"Nikko AM Shenton Global Opportunities SGD","LU1064131342.USD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc USD","LU0786609619.USD":"高盛全球千禧一代股票组合Acc","BK4515":"5G概念","LU1988902786.USD":"FULLERTON LUX FUNDS GLOBAL ABSOLUTE ALPHA \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0719512351.SGD":"JPMorgan Funds - US Technology A (acc) SGD","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU1232071149.USD":"AZ FUND 1 GLOBAL GROWTH SELECTOR \"AAZ\" (USDHDG) ACC","SGXZ81514606.USD":"大华环球创新基金A Acc USD","LU0320765059.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD","LU1823568750.SGD":"Fidelity Global Technology A-ACC SGD","LU1674673691.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AD\" (USD) INC","LU0210533765.USD":"JPM GLOBAL GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0234570918.USD":"高盛全球核心股票组合Acc Close","LU1674673428.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL LOWER CARBON EQUITY \"AC\" (USD) ACC","LU2237957902.USD":"NIKKO AM GLOBAL EQUITY \"F\" (USD) ACC","LU2552382215.SGD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2543165471.USD":"E FUND (HK) GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0708995401.HKD":"FRANKLIN U.S. OPPORTUNITIES \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU0942090050.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD)  INC","LU2552382058.USD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2237957811.SGD":"NIKKO AM GLOBAL EQUITY \"F\" (SGD) ACC","LU2384288077.EUR":"AZ EQUITY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"A-INS\" (EUR) ACC","LU2552382132.HKD":"WELLINGTON US BRAND POWER \"A\" (HKD) ACC","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","LU1621768206.USD":"AZ EQUITY GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE \"AAZ\" (USD) ACC","LU0130517989.USD":"HARRIS ASSOCIATES US VALUE EQUITY \"R\" INC","LU0130102774.USD":"Natixis Harris Associates US Equity RA USD","IE00B19Z8X17.USD":"FTGF CLEARBRIDGE US LARGE CAP GROWTH  \"AG\" (USD) ACC","BK4587":"ChatGPT概念","LU0234572021.USD":"高盛美国核心股票组合Acc","NFLX":"奈飞","LU0210536198.USD":"JPM US GROWTH \"A\" ACC","LU0477156953.USD":"HARRIS ASSOCIATES US VALUE EQUITY \"RE\" (USD) ACC","LU1069344957.HKD":"AB SICAV I - AMERICAN GROWTH PORTFOLIO \"AD\" (HKD) INC","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","LU2896262040.SGD":"JPM US GROWTH FUND \"A\" (SGD) ACC","LU0211326839.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) INC","IE00BKVL7J92.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Equity Sustainability Leaders A Acc USD","BK4108":"电影和娱乐","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4588":"碎股","BK4507":"流媒体概念","LU0006306889.USD":"SCHRODER ISF US LARGE CAP \"A\" (USD) INC AV","LU0211326755.USD":"TEMPLETON GLOBAL INCOME \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","LU1814569148.SGD":"WELLINGTON GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"D\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2087625088.SGD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4598":"佩洛西持仓","LU1720051108.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE \"AT\" (HKD) ACC","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","IE00BFXG1179.USD":"BNY MELLON U.S. EQUITY INCOME \"B\" (USD) INC","LU0672654240.SGD":"FTIF - Franklin US Opportunities A Acc SGD-H1","LU1429558221.USD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity RA USD","LU1548497426.USD":"安联环球人工智能AT Acc","SGXZ99366536.SGD":"United Global Innovation A Acc SGD-H","BK4125":"广播","LU1435385759.SGD":"Natixis Loomis Sayles US Growth Equity RA SGD-H","LU2264538146.SGD":"Fullerton Lux Funds - Global Absolute Alpha A Acc SGD","BK4115":"综合电信业务"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2589829494","content_text":"Like all the old Hollywood studios, Warner Bros. has taken a twisted path into the present, filled with mergers and acquisitions—the latest a proposed sale to Netflix for $82.7 billion, including assumed debt. Some have worked out well and some haven’t, but the good ones are all long in the rearview mirror.The 1950s heralded the end of the studio system of Hollywood’s Golden Era. The studios began to see competition from television, and they lost their theater chains to antitrust action by the U.S. Department of Justice. In dire need of cash, Warner Bros. made one of the worst media deals of all time in 1956, selling off its entire pre-1948 film library just as TV stations were about to need those old movies and cartoons to fill their schedules.Like many studios, Warner was adrift for years. As U.S. culture changed in the 1960s, Warner and the other studios had trouble keeping up, and that was the last straw.In 1967 an aging Jack Warner still owned a controlling interest in the studio and sold it to a film distribution company named Seven Arts to form Warner Bros.-Seven Arts. But Seven Arts had bitten off more than it could chew. After a string of flops in 1968 and 1969, the company was sold to Steve Ross’s Kinney National, which owned mortuaries, parking lots, and other decidedly nonentertainment businesses. The studio was re-christened again, this time as Warner Communications.Thus began the best years for Warner both financially and creatively since the 1930s. It had production and distribution for film, television and music as these were all burgeoning in the 1970s. In 1990 it added publishing with Time Inc. It also brought a cable television system that combined with Warner’s to create one of the largest systems in the U.S., just as cable TV was about to boom. The new company was called Time Warner.The 1996 addition of Turner Broadcasting brought cable channels, the pre-1986 MGM film library, a plethora of cartoons, and the return of the pre-1948 Warner library, bringing Casablanca and Bugs Bunny back home.Though there was reported friction between the button-down publishers at Time and the laid-back Hollywood scene, the 1990s were peak Warner. The film studio pumped out hits and was finding new distribution channels internationally and with home video. Stuffed with ad pages, it was a high point for magazine publishing. The TV studio produced many of the top shows on U.S. television, including Seinfeld, Friends, and ER, all of which are still raking in cash today. The WB broadcast network started up. Cable subscriptions were expanding. CNN set the standard for television news, and the Turner networks added sports. Warner/Elektra/Atlantic was the largest distributor of music in the industry’s best decade.But like Warner’s first golden era, this one also ended with a new medium: the internet. Old-media companies were justifiably concerned that it would disrupt their businesses, and with hindsight we know they were right to be scared. Time Warner CEO Gerald Levin thought the answer was another merger, this time with the premier internet service at a time when dial-up connections were still king—America Online. Despite being the smaller company, AOL was valued more highly than Time Warner in the 2001 all-stock deal that formed AOL-Time Warner.This was a disastrous hookup of old and new media. The promised “synergies” never materialized. The World Wide Web overtook AOL’s walled-garden model of the internet. Most important, the timing couldn’t have been worse, with the deal being announced two months before the dot-com crash. Eventually, $99 billion of the $165 billion merger was written down. AOL was just sold in October for a reported $1.4 billion.The merger strategy that had been so successful for 30 years fell flat on its face, and since then, Warner has faced another long period of struggle.In 2018, with many parts severed from Warner like AOL and Time Warner Cable, AT&T bought the studio, renaming it WarnerMedia. But just three years later it saw the strategic error of larding on $44 billion in debt (including assumed debt) to buy Warner’s flagging properties. By 2022, AT&T had merged it with Discovery’s cable channels and spun it off asWarner Bros. Discovery—a pastiche of old media—which it remains today.Every media merger is different, but among these episodes the Netflix-Warner hookup most closely resembles the Seven Arts deal. Like Netflix, Seven Arts began as distribution for a new medium, in this case TV. Seven Arts bought TV rights from studios and packaged them together to sell to TV stations. Like Netflix, Seven Arts started making its own content when the studios weren’t producing enough. And like Netflix, it turned to acquiring a distressed old media company to add more content and production.This doesn’t mean the Netflix-Warner deal is doomed, but it highlights the integration challenges to Netflix as it brings in a sprawling old-media company.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NFLX":1.95,"WBD":1.96}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":90,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":30,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}