We’re seeing third-order effects ripple through the market right now — with $Lumentum(LITE)$ , $Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$ , and the broader photonics names getting hammered 10%+.
Part of this is the sector-wide selloff triggered by $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ Sandisk’s -10% move and weakness across semis. But my angle is that the real story is upstream: the Japanese supply chain is likely running out of InP inventory/capacity because of Japan’s new export controls — and InP is critical for the Western optical buildout at scale.
I wouldn’t lump COHR in with the other photonics names, but even they’re already stretched on capacity, and this only gets worse with Sumitomo and JX now affected. In turn, this bottlenecks $LITE and others that rely on Japanese-sourced InP to build optics for things like $GOOGL’s TPU Ironwood clusters.
There are offsets that could spark a rally:
→ downstream pricing power (like HBM) could absorb supply shortages
→ Japan relaxing the InP export controls (unlikely)
→ $AXTI delivering substrates at scale once their $100M capacity expansion comes online
Long term, I’m still extremely bullish on the space. But near-term? No clue if the risk-off continues or whether photonics snaps back.
Export controls are the biggest wildcard. With Japan’s two largest competitors effectively halted, $AXTI — and indirectly, China — now control the global flow of InP substrates.
And I think that’s where many analysts are missing the plot: this isn’t about output volume, it’s about pricing power on a finite, critical resource.
It becomes a game-theory problem like HBM — but instead of several players, you basically have one.
InP used to be a few-hundred-million-dollar niche telecom market. Now hyperscalers like $GOOGL would pay billions just to keep Ironwood on track. That pushes TAM from a few hundred million to multiple billions — even $10B+ — once the bidding wars start. And you still have a ~$1.2B market cap sitting on two monopolistic chokepoints.
If pricing went up 3000%, it’d still only be a small percentage of an ASIC cluster’s BOM. You don’t need 3000% more supply under export controls — you just raise prices significantly and aggressively.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- MKTrader·01-10 08:30TOPLet's ride your theory with AXTI and see where we end up. Wear a spacesuit XDLikeReport
- 1PC·01-10 23:05Nice Sharing 😊 @JC888 @Barcode @Shyon @DiAngel @koolgal @AqaLikeReport
