8:/¥^pmMYB5biww^%-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

Like
Comment
Favorite

略知
07:42

8:/¥^pmMYB5biww^%

The United States has returned $100 billion in tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court, court documents show

美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府已经退还约1000亿美元此前征收的关税。这些关税此前已被美国最高法院裁定无效。美国国际贸易法院的一份法院文件显示了这一情况。这一金额相当于最高法院裁定无效的关税总额1660亿美元的逾一半。2月20日，美国最高法院裁定特朗普此前规模最大的多数关税措施无效。他称最高法院大法官“不忠诚”，并依据另一项法律授权推出新的临时性10%关税。随后，特朗普又依据《1974年贸易法》第301条推出新一轮全球关税。

The United States has returned $100 billion in tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court, court documents show

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Like

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

empty

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":593723974403064,"tweetId":"593723974403064","gmtCreate":1785973352835,"gmtModify":1785973355875,"author":{"id":3555751565071436,"idStr":"3555751565071436","authorId":3555751565071436,"authorIdStr":"3555751565071436","name":"略知","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/55468513b5c04e4b13e60d604885e015","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":4,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>8:/¥^pmMYB5biww^%</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>8:/¥^pmMYB5biww^%</p></body></html>","text":"8:/¥^pmMYB5biww^%","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/593723974403064","repostId":1192659524,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1192659524","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1785972655,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1192659524?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-08-06 07:30","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"The United States has returned $100 billion in tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court, court documents show","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1192659524","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府已经退还约1000亿美元此前征收的关税。这些关税此前已被美国最高法院裁定无效。美国国际贸易法院的一份法院文件显示了这一情况。这一金额相当于最高法院裁定无效的关税总额1660亿美元的逾一半。2月20日，美国最高法院裁定特朗普此前规模最大的多数关税措施无效。他称最高法院大法官“不忠诚”，并依据另一项法律授权推出新的临时性10%关税。随后，特朗普又依据《1974年贸易法》第301条推出新一轮全球关税。","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">President of the United States<strong>Donald Trump</strong>The government has refunded approximately<strong>$100 billion</strong>Tariffs previously imposed. The tariffs have previously been ruled invalid by the U.S. Supreme Court. A court filing from the U.S. Court of International Trade shows this.</p><p><h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">Details:</h3><ul><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Court documents filed by the U.S. Court of International Trade said: \"About<strong>$100 billion</strong>Refund (including customs duties and interest) has been completed. These refunds are processed through the 'Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries Refund component', which has been certified by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and sent to the U.S. Treasury for payment. \"</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. Customs officials noted in Tuesday's filing that as of<strong>End of July</strong>The refund amount has reached the above scale.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">This amount is equal to the total amount of tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court<strong>$166 billion</strong>More than half of them.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Despite criticism from some analysts and legal setbacks, Trump will<strong>Customs duty</strong>As a central pillar of its foreign and trade policies.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Critics say the refunds are not going to ordinary households, but to corporate importers.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Democratic U.S. Rep. Greg Casar said this week: \"Trump is giving these so-called 'refunds' back to businesses, not ordinary working people. Every penny of these refunds should be returned to American consumers.\"</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump's previously largest majority tariff measure was invalid. The Supreme Court found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President of the United States to unilaterally impose tariffs on goods imported from trading partners.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump responded to the ruling by further escalating his trade actions. He called Supreme Court justices \"<strong>Disloyalty</strong>\", and under another legal mandate to introduce a new temporary<strong>10% tariff</strong>。 Like IEEPA, no president has used the law to authorize such tariffs before.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Subsequently, Trump relies on \"<strong>Section 301 of the Trade Act 1974</strong>Introduce a new round of global tariffs. This provision is intended to address unfair or discriminatory economic practices adopted by other countries.</p><p></li></ul></body></html></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The United States has returned $100 billion in tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court, court documents show</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe United States has returned $100 billion in tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court, court documents show\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2026-08-06 07:30</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">President of the United States<strong>Donald Trump</strong>The government has refunded approximately<strong>$100 billion</strong>Tariffs previously imposed. The tariffs have previously been ruled invalid by the U.S. Supreme Court. A court filing from the U.S. Court of International Trade shows this.</p><p><h3 style=\"text-align: left;\">Details:</h3><ul><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Court documents filed by the U.S. Court of International Trade said: \"About<strong>$100 billion</strong>Refund (including customs duties and interest) has been completed. These refunds are processed through the 'Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries Refund component', which has been certified by U.S. Customs and Border Protection and sent to the U.S. Treasury for payment. \"</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">U.S. Customs officials noted in Tuesday's filing that as of<strong>End of July</strong>The refund amount has reached the above scale.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">This amount is equal to the total amount of tariffs ruled invalid by the Supreme Court<strong>$166 billion</strong>More than half of them.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Despite criticism from some analysts and legal setbacks, Trump will<strong>Customs duty</strong>As a central pillar of its foreign and trade policies.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Critics say the refunds are not going to ordinary households, but to corporate importers.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Democratic U.S. Rep. Greg Casar said this week: \"Trump is giving these so-called 'refunds' back to businesses, not ordinary working people. Every penny of these refunds should be returned to American consumers.\"</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">On February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Trump's previously largest majority tariff measure was invalid. The Supreme Court found that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the President of the United States to unilaterally impose tariffs on goods imported from trading partners.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Trump responded to the ruling by further escalating his trade actions. He called Supreme Court justices \"<strong>Disloyalty</strong>\", and under another legal mandate to introduce a new temporary<strong>10% tariff</strong>。 Like IEEPA, no president has used the law to authorize such tariffs before.</p><p></li><li><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Subsequently, Trump relies on \"<strong>Section 301 of the Trade Act 1974</strong>Introduce a new round of global tariffs. This provision is intended to address unfair or discriminatory economic practices adopted by other countries.</p><p></li></ul></body></html></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aed8918079cc7b8df3a718bb530beafb","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1192659524","content_text":"美国总统唐纳德·特朗普政府已经退还约1000亿美元此前征收的关税。这些关税此前已被美国最高法院裁定无效。美国国际贸易法院的一份法院文件显示了这一情况。详情：美国国际贸易法院提交的法院文件称：“约1000亿美元的退款（包括关税及利息）已经完成。这些退款通过‘综合管理和报关处理系统退款模块’（Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries Refund component）办理，经美国海关与边境保护局认证后，已发送至美国财政部进行支付。”美国海关官员在周二提交的文件中指出，截至7月底，退款金额已经达到上述规模。这一金额相当于最高法院裁定无效的关税总额1660亿美元的逾一半。尽管一些分析人士提出批评，并且在法律层面遭遇挫折，特朗普仍然将关税作为其外交和贸易政策的核心支柱。批评人士表示，这些退款并没有流向普通家庭，而是流向了企业进口商。美国民主党众议员格雷格·卡萨尔（Greg Casar）本周表示：“特朗普正在把这些所谓的‘退款’退给企业，而不是普通劳动者。这些退款中的每一分钱都应该返还给美国消费者。”2月20日，美国最高法院裁定特朗普此前规模最大的多数关税措施无效。最高法院认定，《国际紧急经济权力法》（IEEPA）并没有授权美国总统单方面对从贸易伙伴进口的商品征收关税。特朗普对这一裁决的回应是进一步升级其贸易行动。他称最高法院大法官“不忠诚”，并依据另一项法律授权推出新的临时性10%关税。与IEEPA一样，此前没有任何一位总统曾利用该法律授权征收此类关税。随后，特朗普又依据《1974年贸易法》第301条推出新一轮全球关税。该条款旨在应对其他国家采取的不公平或歧视性经济行为。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPUU":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SPYQ":0.6,"DMAX":0.6,"YSPY":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,"SPXL":0.6,"VOO":0.6,"MMAX":0.6,"SPYU":0.6,"SPYM":0.6,"SPYH":0.6,"SPY":0.6,"HIBL":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,".SPX":2,"SPDN":0.6,"SPXS":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"SMAX":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":20,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":17,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}