To The Moon

Walmart delivered the kind of quarter companies normally dream about: it beat expectations on earnings and revenue, raised full-year guidance and continued to grow. Wall Street responded by selling the shares hard. On August 20, adjusted EPS came in at $0.81 against consensus of $0.7413, while revenue reached $187.94 billion, up roughly 6% year on year. Yet the stock plunged 9%, its worst earnings-day reaction in Walmart's last ten reported quarters and its fourth consecutive earnings-day decline. That is not a normal earnings story. It is a valuation story, an expectations story and, increasingly, a fight about what Walmart is actually worth. Walmart built a giant machine. Wall Street narrowed the tightrope The beat that came with a footnote The most revealing detail was buried beneath th

🌟🌟🌟When a market faces a multi year inflation fight and still refuses to break, the trend is telling you everything you need to know.  I am betting on an upward breakthrough rather than a macro led decline. We have been staring at the exact same inflation ghost for over 5 years now.  Wall Street has already priced in a higher for longer narrative.  With the new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh getting rid of the dot plot forward guidance, his silence has the market jumping at its own shadow. But sticky inflation isn't a surprise anymore.  It is just an annoying background noise of the 2020s. The good news is that $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ blowout earnings brings much cheer to investors.  It is not every day you get a company scaling to USD 10

I’d choose D — satellite and terrestrial networks will eventually merge into one integrated ecosystem. SpaceX certainly has the technology to disrupt wireless communications, but building a nationwide terrestrial network is vastly different from providing satellite coverage. Urban density, indoor connectivity, capacity, mobility and fiber infrastructure remain difficult challenges. That is why I don’t see T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T as immediate casualties. More likely, SpaceX will combine Starlink satellites, its newly acquired spectrum and existing terrestrial infrastructure through partnerships, tower leases and network sharing. Ironically, the biggest beneficiaries may be companies that help build the network. The real opportunity isn’t simply SpaceX versus telecom—it’s the converg

Nvidia’s guidance changes the AI conversation from “future potential” to visible, accelerating demand. A $108B Q3 revenue outlook, alongside surging data-center sales, suggests hyperscaler capex still has plenty of fuel. I’m therefore more constructive on AI hardware into September—but I wouldn’t chase blindly. Rising memory costs and Nvidia’s projected margin compression show that even winners are starting to face capacity constraints and higher input costs. For valuations, I’d still put AI capex ahead of Fed policy in the near term. A hawkish Jackson Hole could trigger volatility, but if AI spending continues compounding, strong earnings can ultimately overpower higher-rate pressure. As for Meta and Snap, I think regulatory risk is becoming a structural theme rather than a one-off. Teen

Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA) is showing a potentially significant bullish reversal setup on the weekly chart, with the long-term Elliott Wave structure suggesting that a major corrective phase may have ended and a new impulsive advance could be underway. The stock experienced a substantial decline after completing a cycle-degree wave I near the 2021 peak. This was followed by a complex and extended corrective structure that lasted several years. According to the current Elliott Wave count, that correction appears to have completed with wave II near the 2025–2026 lows, around the $20 area. The chart marks the long-term invalidation level at $11.54, keeping the bullish scenario valid as long as price remains above this level. Following the completion of wave II, Moderna has shown a strong recovery

I’m leaning bullish on the AI memory super cycle. AI data-center demand is structurally different from the traditional PC and smartphone-driven cycles, while memory supply remains relatively constrained, which could keep pricing and earnings stronger for longer. I also see the bigger shareholder returns from $SK hynix(SKHY)$ and Samsung as a positive. Buybacks, cancellations and higher dividends give investors a more direct share of the AI-driven cash flow, potentially making these stocks more attractive even after their recent volatility. For me, the key is whether AI demand continues growing fast enough to absorb new capacity. If it does, I think SK Hynix remains one of the more compelling ways to play the AI memory boom.

I’m bullish on copper’s long-term story, especially with AI data centers, power grids and electrification driving structural demand. Unlike a purely cyclical trade, these infrastructure trends could keep copper demand elevated for years. If I had to choose one approach, I’d go with $Global X Copper Miners ETF(COPX)$ . I prefer getting exposure through copper miners because rising copper prices can translate into stronger margins and potentially amplify the upside, although I’m aware of the added operational and geopolitical risks. For me, the biggest risks are China’s demand and whether new supply comes online faster than expected. But if supply remains tight w

I’m still bullish on gold because this rally looks increasingly structural rather than purely speculative. Central-bank buying, ETF inflows and strong physical demand are all supporting the market, while concerns over debt and currency debasement provide a longer-term tailwind. If I had to choose one vehicle, I’d go with $SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust(GLDM)$ for its low 0.10% expense ratio and straightforward exposure to physical gold. I prefer it for long-term holding rather than paying extra

I’m more bullish on AI hardware after Nvidia’s $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ results. The stronger-than-expected guidance confirms that AI capex remains powerful, although I’ll be watching memory costs and margin pressure closely. For $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ and $Snap Inc(SNAP)$ , I think the regulatory pressure is becoming a broader theme rather than a one-off. Teen-safety rules and lawsuits could create higher costs and uncertainty across the social-media sector. For tech valuations, I’d say AI capex momentum matters more right now. As long as hyperscalers keep spending aggressively, strong earnings growth can help offset some pressure from higher-for-longer rates. I

There are 2 camps of $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ .  Camp A is the wait & see skeptics.  This camp is terrified of the velocity of Meta's cash burn. To them, buying Meta now is to chase a Capex bubble. Camp B:  The Bargain Hunters.  This is my tribe.  We look at the pullback & see a golden opportunity.  Why? Meta is the cheapest of the Mag7 with forward P/E ratio of 17.2x.  In contrast Tesla is 95x. Wall Street is pricing Meta like a slow growth legacy utility company, while its platforms are generating double digit revenue growth. Meta's AI already has over 3 billion daily active users.  Meta's advanced AI models are optimising ad targeting in real time, boosting aggregate ad revenue. By making Ll

I think the biggest change in the software narrative is that AI is no longer automatically viewed as a threat. Salesforce and CrowdStrike are showing that companies with proprietary data and deeply embedded workflows can monetize AI and potentially increase the value of their platforms. Personally, I’m most interested in Salesforce & $ServiceNow(NOW)$ because their AI agents are being integrated into enterprise workflows, creating opportunities to charge for agents, tasks and usage instead of just user seats. Microsoft remains a strong contender, but the key is whether AI translates into higher contract values and recurring cash flow. For me, the next few quar