Tesla Quick Take: 2026 Could See Unsupervised Robotaxi and FSD Launch Robotaxi and FSD largely support $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$  's current high valuation. Here's an update on Tesla's latest operational status. Robotaxi Current Operations: 1. Tesla Robotaxi has a pricing advantage over Waymo: Tesla Robotaxi initially charged a fixed fare of $4.20 per trip, later adjusted to $6.90 for an expanded service area. The latest pricing model has gradually shifted to dynamic pricing, about $1.5 per mile. In comparison, Waymo's pricing in San Francisco and Phoenix is about $2.5 per mile, reaching over $3 per mile during peak hours. 2. Tesla Robotaxi operations are currently limited to Austin, Texas, and the San Francisco Bay

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$  $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  $Alphabet(GOOGL)$   08Jan26 🇺🇸|09Jan26 🇳🇿 New high of the day printed early, steady buying from the open with price holding above intraday VWAP as consolidation tightens. +$12 off the low today. No new “good news.” No sentiment shift. Buyers showed up anyway. Price first. Narratives later! I’m tracking $TSLA through a very deliberate consolidation phase where price, flow, and narrative are lining up again after two weeks of sequential decline. This is not disorderly selling. This is digestion. 📊 My Daily Structure

Good

$NVIDIA(NVDA)$ 's Drive Thor platform is emerging as a formidable competitor to $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$'s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, though the two differ fundamentally in their target market and technological approach. Tesla offers a direct-to-consumer FSD product, while Nvidia provides an autonomous driving platform for other automakers to integrate into their own vehicles. In this article, we would like to look at a comprehensive, business-oriented assessment of whether Nvidia’s Drive Thor platform could meaningfully challenge or even derail Tesla’s Robotaxi vision — with a focus on how the two approaches differ fundamentally in market strategy, technological architecture, and competitive advantages.

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  $Micron Technology(MU)$  Why sentiment, structure, and long-dated options are telling two very different stories I’m looking at $TSLA the same way I always have, by separating opinion from positioning and narrative from capital. The downgrade noise is loud, but the tape is louder. 📉 Analyst pessimism versus what price is actually doing GLJ Research raising its Tesla price target to $25.28 from $19.05 while reiterating a Sell borders on satire. A $6 increase that still implies a near-total collapse from ~$437 tells me this is less about updated math and more about anchoring. The justification, Q4 delivery mix

Markets are quietly telling two stories at once: the labor data is cooling just enough to keep the Fed cautious, while capital is still sprinting toward AI infrastructure where demand is structural, not cyclical. Near term, geopolitics and rates drive volatility; long term, compute, storage, and energy efficiency decide the winners. January strength looks less like speculation and more like positioning for where growth is actually being built.

🩷Good

🚨 The "Android Moment" for Robotaxis? Why Nvidia Thor is Tesla’s Biggest Nightmare Is the "Winner-Takes-All" thesis for Tesla ($TSLA) officially dead? That is the multi-billion dollar question shaking out weak hands today. While Elon Musk brushed off the threat on X, the market voted with its feet, dragging Tesla down 4% while Mercedes-Benz and BYD caught a bid. Here is the brutal reality check: For five years, the bull case for Tesla has been that they are the only ones with the data, the silicon (Dojo), and the fleet. But at CES, Jensen Huang didn’t just unveil a chip. He handed a nuclear weapon—the Nvidia Thor platform—to Tesla’s enemies. We are no longer looking at Tesla vs. "Legacy Auto." We are looking at Tesla vs. The Nvidia Ecosystem. And historically, betting against an ecosystem

I remain bullish on Tesla's $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$  Full Self-Driving (FSD) and see the recent noise around NVIDIA's $NVIDIA(NVDA)$   Thor platform more as hype than a real threat. While Thor looks impressive on paper and CES showcased strong partnerships with Lucid $Lucid Group Inc(LCID)$  , Mercedes-Benz, and BYD $Byd Company Limited(002594)$  , the reality is that self-driving is not just about raw compute power or flashy demos. The hardest part is handling those rare, extreme edge cases — the last 1% of autonomy — and tha

1. How to view Tesla’s FSD today Tesla’s Full Self-Driving is best understood as a highly advanced driver-assistance system, not yet a true autonomous solution. Strengths Industry-leading real-world data advantage, measured in billions of driven miles Strong end-to-end neural network architecture Rapid iteration speed via over-the-air updates Clear long-term ambition to remove human supervision Structural limitations Camera-only approach increases edge-case risk No redundancy via lidar or radar, which regulators favour Still requires driver supervision in all jurisdictions Safety validation remains statistical rather than deterministic In short, FSD is technically impressive but commercially premature. Its value today lies more in optionality than realised autonomy revenue. 2. Is NVIDIA Th

The market is celebrating Tesla's 3% pop on strong China numbers. That reaction is understandable, but incomplete. Yes, the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA) data matters. But the real signal is not volume. It is strategic leverage. China is quietly becoming Tesla's most important AI and autonomy proving ground. And that changes the long-term valuation math. The Headline Everyone Sees: China Deliveries Are Back December 2025 numbers surprised to the upside: 97,171 wholesale units, a new monthly record +11% month-on-month Estimated 94,000 retail sales, up 13% year-on-year This confirms two things: Tesla demand in China is stabilising despite intense local competition Price cuts have already done their job — elasticity is improving But here is the key insight: volume alone does not just

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Buckle up, folks! Tesla's shares just blasted off with a sizzling 3% leap, fueled by blockbuster December 2025 numbers from the China Passenger Car Association. We're talking a jaw-dropping 97,171 vehicles wholesaled – that's the second-highest monthly haul ever for Tesla China! 😎 This beast of a performance cranked up 11% from November and flexed a 13% year-over-year sales spike to around 94,000 units. Even with a full-year dip of about 5-7% to 625,000-851,732 vehicles amid fierce EV rivalries, this late-year surge screams resilience and dominance in the world's biggest electric playground. 🌏💥 But wait, there's more rocket fuel in the tank! Full Self-Driving (FSD) is gearing up to transform Tesla's fate in China. Partial appr

(1) Tesla's FSD still remains the market leader in consumer-available technology & recently won the Best Tech 2026 for driver assistance systems due to its vast utility on both city and highway roads. So yes, this trend seems real and also depends on how unsupervised FSD in select earmarked areas in 2026 performs.  (2) again yes, NVIDIA's DRIVE Thor platform could be a direct challenge to Tesla's robotaxi ambitions, though the two companies operate on very different business models. The technological threat is quite material. Musk has obviously downplayed this as a near-term threat, suggesting legacy automakers will take several years to integrate such chips at scale, placing the real competitive pressure 5–6 years out. So let us be patient. (3) Depends! Are you a bull?: if y

We saw some interesting developments in 2025 with respect to $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ - some negative and few positive too: (1) Loss of Global Lead: In 2025, Tesla officially lost its title, in a rather convincing way, as the world's top seller of battery-electric vehicles - and that surprisingly to China's BYD, which delivered 2.26 million BEVs compared to Tesla's 1.64 million. Will the tide turn in 2026? In theory it can but Tesla has some smart thinking ti do. (2) Growth Outlook: Analysts are split on 2026. While some expect a recovery driven by FSD and a potential "Robotaxi" scale-up, others remain bearish due to aging vehicle models and the expiration of U.S. federal EV tax credits. So, unless trump feels uncharacteristically

It's really interesting option scew on Tesla right now, everyone is trading far OTM options with puts leading volume by far

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ $Li Auto(LI)$  $NIO Inc.(NIO)$  2Jan26 🇺🇸|3Jan26 🇳🇿 Liquidity sweep completed. Upper range tagged near $462.50, lower range resolved near $440. Seven consecutive red sessions now on the tape, the longest losing streak since April 2024. New year, familiar $TSLA behaviour. 📊 My Daily Structure And Technical Read I’m seeing textbook momentum compression rather than structural failure. Price pushed into the upper band near $462.50 before resolving lower into the $440 liquidity pocket, completing a full range rotation. On the 4H and 30m charts, Keltner and Bollinger envelopes have compressed sharply, with price leaning against the

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Bullish $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$ Bullish $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ Bullish 31Dec25 🇺🇸 | 01Jan26 🇳🇿  I’m calling this market exactly as it traded, not as it was supposed to. The Grinch is no longer stealing Christmas, he’s cancelling it. The Santa Rally script failed, volatility took control, and $TSLA became the clearest expression of a regime shift that punished complacency and rewarded structure. That Grinch board isn’t satire. It’s a ledger. Happy New Year to all Tigers and traders 🎆 I’m stepping into 2026 focused on discipline, data, and positioning, not folklore. 🎅❌ Santa Rally Failure: When the Grinch

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ $NIO Inc.(NIO)$ Bullish $Intel(INTC)$ Bullish 29 Dec 2025 🇺🇸 | 30 Dec 2025 🇳🇿 I’m not reading this $TSLA pullback as failure. I’m reading it as repricing. The daily gap is now fully closed, downside liquidity has been harvested, and the market is being forced to decide how much of Tesla’s 2026 autonomy, robotics, and energy roadmap it wants to capitalise today, rather than debate near-term delivery noise. 🧠 Daily structure, what actually matters I’m seeing a textbook daily reset, not a breakdown. • The gap below has been fully filled, removing downside magnetism • A clean gap remains overhead, leaving unfinished business ab