Everyone opens the latest 13F filings looking for the same thing: What did smart money buy? I think that misses the more interesting question. What if smart money itself cannot agree? 🤔 The latest Q2 2026 filings show exactly that. Across more than 6,000 institutional filings reviewed by Reuters, there was surprisingly little agreement about where the next big returns in technology will come from. Nearly 44% of institutions reduced exposure to the Magnificent Seven, while about 42% increased or initiated positions. That is almost a coin flip. For me, that might be more useful than any individual billionaire’s purchase. 🧠 Signal #1: The AI trade is splitting into different camps AI is no longer one trade. A year or two ago, the strategy could almost be simplified to: AI spending rises ➡️ ch
Q2 13F Disclosures: What Is 'Smart Money' Actually Buying?
13F season, last window. Berkshire disclosed nearly $20bn of net equity purchases in Q2 — ending 14 straight quarters of net selling — roughly $10bn of it Alphabet; the full list lands by week's end. Nvidia's own filing is the other one to watch, given the circular-trading argument. Citi's book crossed $300bn with semiconductor additions including Micron and AMD. Alphabet −0.18% Wednesday, Nvidia +3.03%. Would you follow the institutional playbook — and which side, Buffett's Alphabet bet or Nvidia's supply chain wager?
+ Follow
+13