To The Moon

$Sing Inv & Fin(S35.SI)$   $Sing Inv & Fin(S35.SI)$   @Optionspuppy   Recent update on Sing Investment. This is my first official investment to break 1000 USD return. Ironially it s an sgx holding. With 

$GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF(NVDL)$ made a small profit of NVDL shares last week. Got advice from someone that options decay might be too much for me and that leveraged etfs might be a better bet. So I bought at the sell of at night and sold in premarket the next day. Albeit while I lost out on the major upside. I'm still glad I'm training myself to take profit. Below you can see how keeping calm has helped me recover the initial losses I suffered during the market crash. @CaptainTiger  @TigerTradingNotes  @TigerWire  

$STLA 20260116 13.0 CALL$   a stellantis call I did when the stock was 12.50. I had a feeling market was pumping it up to dump, because when it was at a PE of 3, this stock could barely stay at 14. And now it has a PE of 8 and the stock is close to 13 dollars? In the short term its prime for a drop. Its P/B is really low and with a book value per share of 28, stelkantis is oversold. BUT Management sucks, they double down on crappy investments and divest from their profitable ones. They are riddles with strikes so their work force reliability is questionable. Their ROA is so low that their large assets don't make much of a boon in fact one could make the argument that such menial returns could be seen as depreciation of th

$NVDA 20250328 130.0 CALL$ for the sake of transparency I'm showing you the first call I entered at 117, eventhought I sold at 12q, the decay ate 40% into my option value. Long calls are speculative in nature and sometimes can be a gamble, laying too high a price for such an option can be dangerous, in this regard, bearish 🐻  calls won the day. I hope you guys can look at my mistakes and learn a thing or two [Smile]   $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  $Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF(NVDS)$  $Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bear 3x Shares(SOXS)$  

$NVDA 20250328 130.0 CALL$   my 3rd call entered around the right price range but decay also affected this call a little.  If this had been my first call and I averaged in after this point, I would be in a far better position, but this one is one of my better trades, a trade i made during high fears which was a good strategum, that helped me out of my mess in the first place. $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  $GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF(NVDL)$  $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$  

$NVDA 20250328 130.0 CALL$  $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$  $NVIDIA(NVDA)$  $SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC(SMCI)$   My 2nd call, less profit because entered a little too early.

$NVDA 20250328 130.0 CALL$ finally sold my NVDA calls, made a little profit but learned a valuable lesson. I first entered almost 2 weeks ago when NVDA was at 117, then again at 110 and then even lower at 1.06. The NVDA dip ended up lasting longer than I expected and eventhough the price went up to 121 when I tp'ed, the option decay had been so much I only got a little profit. Option decay meant that me buying earlier would have me needing the stock to go much higher in order to profit, than my entry. But here's what I should have done. As soon as my first trade at 117, became red, I should have kept calm and not averaged in, I got advice from a senior trader that NVDA usually goes down in cycles of about 3 days. He also sai

$AAPL 20250314 227.5 CALL$ Decided to play some apple calls last night after ibsaw the sharp sell off. Was waiting to buy a call at the bounce and make a quick snipe. Unfortunately, I misread the volume data, while reading the MACD histogram. I should have waited for confirmation on the volume. Instead I wanted to get in early, and instead bought the fake out and the stock pushed lower.  In red you see where I highlight the fake out, and in green I circled the real volume building, the stock was going down, but volume was steadily building, that should have been my confirmation and I would have bought at 0.25 a contract instead of 0.35, and made 0.13 difference instead of 0.3 Remember people ALWAYS watch the volume care

TL;DR: Alphabet is probably the safest high-growth play in the market right now. Megacaps are definitely not value investment but if you want the stability of megacap but the cheapest one on the market, then Google is your best bet. DCF calculations pit it at a a range of 114-221 $Alphabet(GOOG)$ another bloody red day, Google fell a bit lower to 163. And is now in morningstars range of a fair vakue pick. However I think Google could very well go lower amidst all this fear and the DOJ break up. But in the long term its great at generating FCF, doing share buybacks and is the most intuitive software out there, while LLMs like ChatGPT may compete in the search engine game, not many people know how to use them reliably and many still rely on the eas

$Alphabet(GOOG)$   Market continuing its sell off, however economic data remains unchanged which means all this reaction is future worries over Trump Tarrifs and cost cutting. My view still remains the same, though I'd maybe advise people from choosing options right now and instead pick ordinary shares.  The harsh reality is that Market Movers and institutions control more of the stock market then you, so if they want to force the stock market to move somewhere, there is nothing you or I can do about it.  However the good news is that these guys make their moves pretty short term, 1 to 3 months at max and week to week in their shortest. In the long run, 10 to 30 years the stock market always grows as a whole, so owning shares of com