US Sovereign Fund on the Horizon? Trump Pushes to Seize Ukraine’s Resources
Recent negotiations between the United States and Ukraine have centered on a proposed minerals agreement, aiming to grant the U.S. significant access to Ukraine's valuable natural resources. The initial U.S. proposal, presented on February 12, 2025, by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, sought 50% ownership of Ukraine's mineral and natural resource revenues—including rare earth elements, oil, gas, and port infrastructure. This arrangement was intended as compensation for U.S. military aid provided during Ukraine's conflict with Russia. The proposal stipulated that these assets and funds be transferred into a U.S.-controlled fund until it accumulates $500 billion, which could then be resold as bonds or through an IPO as a listed company.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy rejected this initial proposal, citing the absence of concrete security guarantees and expressing concerns over Ukraine potentially becoming merely a raw materials hub. He emphasized the need for explicit security assurances to accompany any economic agreement.
In response, the U.S. submitted a revised and more detailed agreement last week, reportedly demanding an even larger share of Ukraine's resources. This new proposal includes profits from oil, natural gas, and port infrastructure, with all these assets and funds being transferred into a U.S.-controlled fund until it accumulates $500 billion to establish a U.S. sovereign fund, which could be resold as bonds or through an IPO as a listed company. However, this version still lacks the security guarantees Ukraine seeks.
Regarding the Russian-occupied eastern regions of Ukraine, the draft states that once these territories are reclaimed, they will be jointly developed by the U.S. and Ukraine. Ukraine would contribute two-thirds of the investment, while the U.S. would provide one-third—though Washington may consider its military aid as part of its contribution.
Negotiations are ongoing, with formal discussions scheduled for Monday. While the current proposal is unlikely to reach consensus in its present form, Ukraine may attempt to negotiate for the allocated funds to be reinvested locally as a trade-off. The situation remains fluid, and the international community is closely monitoring how both nations will navigate these complex economic and security considerations.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- Ah_Meng·2025-02-27TOPBtw, congrats on your winnings for the star of the week, or month… don’t know… just happened to take a glance. Well done! [Applaud]LikeReport
- Ah_Meng·2025-02-27TOPI think they will exclude the existing oil and gas profits that’s already there… Ukraine needs money to rebuild. Europe contributes a lot too and only Donald Trump thinks that US contributes $500Bn while it’s probably closer to $100Bn… these blood suckers… go to your place, rob you, kill the family members and you have to pay the mafia to rid of the robbers… who is a bigger blood sucker? Who is a greater evil? That’s the reality of today’s world. The rich gets richer. The strong gets to write their own history…LikeReport
