📊 DBS vs UOB vs OCBC: Who Wins the 2H 2025 Bank Race? 🏦
---
🏦 1. Singapore Banks Q2 Snapshot
Singapore’s Big 3 banks reported Q2 2025 results — and the divergence was telling:
DBS managed to keep its NIM around 2.06%–2.12% despite a declining rate backdrop, boosting its YTD stock gain to ~+13%.
UOB posted modest growth in earnings and fee/trading income, though NIM softened slightly. Its share price is up around 3–4% YTD.
OCBC saw net profit slide 7% to S$1.82B, matching expectations. NIM slipped to 1.92%, but fee income rose 5% to S$1.26B, offsetting margin pressure.
Falling global rates and slower loan growth are weighing on interest income, but each bank is navigating the transition differently.
---
💹 2. DBS — Still the NIM King?
DBS continues to outperform peers thanks to its resilience in margins:
NIM holding above 2.06%, even as rates soften is impressive.
Its stock is leading the pack with ~+13% YTD, driven by digital growth, North Asia exposure, and strong capital returns.
Dividend remains solid, with high forward yield (~5.5%) and prudent capital management.
Key risk: Rising credit costs from Hong Kong property exposure—but analysts expect no major deterioration.
With tight liquidity and structural strength, DBS remains the headline performer of 2025.
---
📊 3. UOB — The Unassuming Diversifier?
UOB may lack the limelight—but its model is quietly evolving:
Fee income climbed ~20% YoY driven by trade finance, FX services, and wealth advisory.
Continued diversification into ASEAN markets (Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam) via Citigroup’s consumer units boost its franchise.
NIM compressed marginally to ~1.95%, but its cost-to-income ratio (~42%) and credit discipline support profitability.
Valuation remains attractive: forward P/E ~10x and yield ~5.5%, offering room for capital gains if sentiment shifts.
UOB feels like the underappreciated workhorse—less shiny, but steadily building long-term resilience.
---
💸 4. OCBC — Dividend Champion with Limits
OCBC’s Q2 matched forecasts but showed vulnerabilities amid rate headwinds:
Profit declined 7% YoY to S$1.82B; NIM contracted to 1.92%.
Non-interest income rose 5% (wealth fees up 24%, trading up 6%) helping cushion margins.
Dividend paused at S$0.41/share (5.16% yield)—still the highest among the trio.
With a conservative CET1 ratio above 15% and 0.9% NPL ratio, OCBC stays defensively positioned.
But investors await clear growth catalysts—digital banking, sustainable finance uptake, or regional expansion follow-through.
OCBC remains the income anchor, but growth expectations stay muted.
---
🧠 5. Final Take — Which Bank for the Long Haul?
Here’s how I allocate my exposure:
60% in DBS – margin strength, innovation, and consistent dividend make it a core hold.
30% in UOB – diversified streams and ASEAN expansion offer upside if the region stabilises.
10% in OCBC – strong yield and capital buffer appeal for conservative long-term investors.
DBS remains the leader — but if sector sentiment turns, UOB’s undervaluation and income diversification could reward patience. OCBC fits an income-first strategy, but may lag without fresh catalysts.
---
💬 Your Turn: What’s Your Bank Play?
How are you positioning in Singapore’s banking ecosystem?
🏦 Are you leaning into DBS for stability or riding UOB’s quieter income growth?
OR are dividends your priority—favoring OCBC?
Comment your allocation among DBS, UOB, and OCBC. 🔹 Best insights may get featured in our next community highlight!
---
> Disclaimer: For informational purposes only—not financial advice.
---
@TigerStars @Tiger_comments @Daily_Discussion @TigerEvents @TigerWire
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
