đŻ When the Hype Fades: The Rise and Fall of the Rare Earths Trade
After reports of smooth U.S.âChina negotiations and Beijingâs assurance that it wouldnât impose export controls on rare earths, related stocks plunged across the board â many collapsing to levels below where the rally began.
Few sectors illustrate the difference between speculation and investment as vividly as rare earths. This episode laid bare the marketâs mania, fear, and the psychology of FOMO-driven trading.
---
đ Phase One: A Party Fueled by FOMO
It all started with one headline rich in imagination:
> âChina may restrict rare earth exports.â
For most investors, ârare earthsâ is a familiar yet vague term â something crucial, geopolitical, even mystical. That was enough to ignite a frenzy.
Money flooded in. Iâd wager most buyers didnât even know the full names or actual businesses of the companies they were buying. They werenât investing in a business â they were chasing a story, a ticker symbol, a quick fortune built on âexport controlâ headlines.
At that stage, no one cared about fundamentals, valuations, or profits. It was pure momentum trading â prices rising simply because they were rising.
Momentum isnât inherently bad. But the danger comes when traders convince themselves theyâre investing â when they forget theyâre surfing emotion, not analysing value.
---
đ„ When the Music Stops
And eventually, it always does.
Once U.S.âChina talks progressed and the export threat faded, the marketâs only support â sentiment â evaporated. Prices reversed sharply, falling faster than they rose.
Why? Because every trader who bought mid-rally suddenly became a desperate seller. With the story gone, there was no reason to stay.
The FOMO-fueled party ended as it always does â with panic, regret, and losses.
---
đ§ When Speculators Exit, Investors Begin
But for a true investor, this is when things finally get interesting.
When the noise fades, you can ask the right questions â the ones that actually matter:
1. Has the geopolitical foundation changed?
The U.S. remains committed to securing an independent rare-earth supply chain. Thatâs not a headline â itâs a decade-long national strategy. Nothing about that has changed.
2. Has the companyâs moat eroded?
MP Materials is still the only U.S.-based company with full âmine-to-magnetâ integration. Its strategic uniqueness hasnât disappeared â if anything, itâs become more visible.
3. Is government backing still real?
The U.S. Department of Defense still holds a stake and continues to offer contracts and floor-price guarantees to stabilise profitability. Those supports donât vanish because of one news cycle.
All three answers are, to me, crystal clear: the long-term story remains intact.
---
đ± After the Noise, the Patience Test
I welcome this correction. It flushed out the fast-money crowd and pulled prices back to levels worthy of real analysis.
That said, letâs be objective:
MP Materials is still loss-making, and the road from mining to magnet manufacturing is long and capital-intensive.
With momentum gone, the stock could consolidate at the bottom for months â testing every investorâs patience.
So no, this isnât a âbuy blindlyâ moment.
Itâs a âstart doing your homeworkâ moment.
When everyone else has moved on to the next shiny theme, thatâs when serious investors quietly get to work â reading filings, tracking progress, and assessing intrinsic value.
Because true investing has never been about chasing noise.
Itâs about waiting, quietly, for value to take root.
@TigerStars @Tiger_comments @Daily_Discussion @TigerEvents @TigerWire
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- PSG2010·2025-10-28Incredible insights! Love the depth! [Wow]LikeReport
