☢️⚡️📈 Uranium Reawakens as Capital Cycles Turn 📈⚡️⚡️☢️

$Denison Mines(DNN)$ $Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF(URAN)$  $Global X Uranium ETF(URA)$  Uranium is reasserting itself as one of the most asymmetric late-cycle commodities, and the price action in Denison Mines Corp ($DNN) reflects that shift with clarity. Shares surged roughly +12% to the $2.97 area following confirmation that the company is prepared to advance the Phoenix ISR project into its execution phase.

☢️ Execution replaces optionality

Denison confirmed readiness to make a final investment decision and expects remaining regulatory approvals in Q1 for the Phoenix ISR uranium project. Construction is targeted to begin by the end of Q1, with first production guided for mid-2028. If delivered, Phoenix would become Canada’s first new large-scale uranium mine since Cigar Lake, a material milestone in a market already tightening as electrification and AI-driven power demand accelerate into 2026.

☢️ Capital update reinforces realism

The updated initial capital estimate of C$600M, approximately +20%, reflects inflationary pressures and design refinement rather than deterioration. Provincial authorisation is already secured, and construction contracts are expected to be finalised in early 2026. With most engineering work complete, the project has shifted from conceptual to executable, positioning Denison for immediate advancement once final approvals are received.

📈 Charts confirm a volatility regime shift

Price action has transitioned decisively into a volatility expansion phase. On both the 30-minute and 4-hour timeframes, $DNN has reclaimed and held above the EMA 13, 21, and 55 stack, with price riding the upper Keltner and Bollinger bands rather than reverting to the mean. That behaviour signals acceptance and positioning, not exhaustion, reinforced by the push toward the $3.00 handle amid increasing institutional attention.

The prior breakout zone in the high $2.70s to low $2.80s now defines first structural support, strengthened by the rising EMA cluster. Above $3.00, overhead supply appears limited until the low $3.20s to $3.30s range, where volatility is likely to expand again. The absence of upper-band rejection remains the defining technical tell.

☢️ Why Phoenix matters strategically

Phoenix is not just another development project. ISR economics, Athabasca-grade geology, and a more constructive Canadian nuclear policy backdrop combine into a rare asset profile. Uranium prices are already up roughly +50% since 2023, utilities remain structurally under-contracted several years forward, and global mine supply is projected to decline into 2026 against rising reactor demand. Policy tailwinds are also re-emerging, highlighted by Sweden’s reversal of its uranium mining ban effective January 2026.

🧠 Timeframe discipline

Management’s mid-2028 production target is credible, though a 2029 to 2030 window remains the more conservative base case once permitting, construction cadence, and commissioning friction are fully absorbed. That does not diminish the strategic value of early positioning in a credible future producer, particularly as AI-related energy demand tightens long-term uranium balances.

📌 Bottom line

Denison is transitioning from optionality to execution at precisely the point in the uranium cycle where credibility begins to outweigh narrative. This is how durable commodity stories are built, incrementally, visibly, and ahead of the capital cycle.

📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀

Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀

@Tiger_comments @TigerPicks @TigerStars @TigerWire @TigerObserver 

# 💰Stocks to watch today?(31 Dec)

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment12

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Hen Solo
    ·01-03 11:11
    TOP
    I’m focused on the cross asset signal here. Uranium strength alongside $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ power demand ties neatly into your macro thesis. Volatility expansion with no upper band rejection usually means positioning is still early.
    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·01-03 11:12
    TOP
    I’m reading the same momentum shift you laid out. $Sprott Uranium Miners ETF(URNM)$ has been coiling with gamma starting to lean positive, and the flow feels more positional than reactive. Structure above support looks constructive without chasing volatility.
    Reply
    Report
  • Kiwi Tigress
    ·01-03 11:51
    TOP
    yeah I felt this one. kinda wild how clean the move was tbh. I was watching $Cameco(CCJ)$ do the same thing, bands opening up, momentum staying bid. lowkey your post made the whole uranium thing click for me fr
    Reply
    Report
  • Queengirlypops
    ·01-03 12:24
    ok but this post went hard because it wasn’t hype it was structure, volatility expanding, liquidity pockets getting eaten, flow turning directional and suddenly uranium feels like a whole regime shift not just a headline, $Denison Mines(DNN)$ popping while AI power demand keeps ramping, cross asset signals lining up, momentum staying loud, gamma not fighting it, honestly this is the kinda post that makes the macro feel tradable, big energy vibes, big cycle energy 🧃
    Reply
    Report
  • Cool Cat Winston
    ·01-03 12:15
    I’m aligned with your uranium framing. The volatility expansion you highlighted in $Denison Mines(DNN)$ feels similar to what I’m seeing in $Cameco(CCJ)$ where structure is tightening after a liquidity pocket cleared. Momentum looks regime driven rather than news driven. Solid macro read BC! 😻😻
    Reply
    Report
  • PetS
    ·01-03 11:52
    I’m seeing a similar setup in $Uranium(UEC)$. Liquidity pockets have been absorbed and the structure is cleaner now. Your point on execution over narrative matters, flow is behaving like a regime shift not a spike.
    Reply
    Report
  • Queengirlypops
    ·01-03 12:08

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Cool Cat Winston
    ·01-03 12:03

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • PetS
    ·01-03 11:41

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Kiwi Tigress
    ·01-03 11:33

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Hen Solo
    ·01-03 11:10

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report
  • Tui Jude
    ·01-03 11:10

    Great article, would you like to share it?

    Reply
    Report