For me, A is the biggest risk, with B and C also worth watching. $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ has proven AI demand remains strong, but the key question is how much future demand is being pulled forward through financing and infrastructure commitments. Strong revenue today doesn’t guarantee the same growth rate forever.

I’m still bullish on Nvidia’s long-term position at the center of AI infrastructure. But I’m becoming more selective across the ecosystem, paying closer attention to the balance sheets and cash flows of customers like $CoreWeave, Inc.(CRWV)$ and $NEBIUS(NBIS)$ .

For my strategy, I’d rather hold core positions and DCA on meaningful pullbacks than chase rallies. As long as hyperscaler spending and real AI demand remain strong, I see the financing concerns as risks to manage rather than reasons to abandon the AI thesis.

@TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_comments

# Nvidia Reclaims AI Narrative — But at What Cost to Gross Margins?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment2

  • Top
  • Latest
  • blinxz
    ·09-02 17:23
    Financing is not the bubble signal here, demand is. If capital keeps showing up for GPU capacity, that actually validates how scarce Nvidia still is
    Reply
    Report
  • quixzi
    ·09-02 17:23
    CRWV balance sheet is exactly where I get picky. NVDA can stay the core while the financed demand names need a way higher bar
    Reply
    Report