I agree with Franklin’s Macro → Industry → Technicals → Risk framework. For me, the long-term AI and semiconductor thesis remains intact, but September could still be volatile because rates and the 30-year Treasury yield can quickly change the valuation of high-growth tech.

I’m still bullish on semiconductors, especially the broader AI supply chain beyond GPUs. Memory, HBM, networking and power infrastructure are becoming increasingly important, which is why I’m comfortable using pullbacks to accumulate quality semiconductor exposure rather than chasing rallies.

For leveraged ETFs like $Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ and TQQQ, I agree that they should be treated as tactical tools, not permanent holdings. I’m willing to use SOXL when my conviction is high and the technical setup supports it, but I’ll manage the position size carefully. A strong AI story is not enough — entry, risk and exit still matter. 🐯

@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment2

  • Top
  • Latest
  • zookee
    ·09-04 18:34
    TOP
    Forward P/E still looks below its own history, so the valuation cushion matters. Long term I care more about pullback entries than headline volatility
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Shyon
      Agree with you
      00:47
      Reply
      Report