$NVDA: The CEO discount. Market +2.35%, chips up, Nvidia alone fell.

Monday in numbers

• NVDA closed at $178.67, down 4.27% (−$7.97). It was down about 7% at one point intraday.

• It was NVDA's lowest close since April, and about $192B of market value gone in one session.

• The rest of the market rallied hard:

– S&P 500 +2.35% to 7,549.94, its best day since April 8

– Nasdaq 100 +3.40%

– All 11 sectors rose, and 418 S&P stocks rose against 80 that fell

– The VIX fell 22% to 19.92, its first close under 20 since the selloff began

• Nvidia's suppliers and rivals rose: AMD +9.22%, TSMC +6.5%, SK Hynix +4.7%

That last point is the key one. If investors were worried about AI chip demand, TSMC and SK Hynix would have fallen with Nvidia. Instead they rose. This is a discount on Nvidia's leadership, not on chip demand.

What's driving it

• Sunday: Huang emailed staff admitting he was unfaithful to his wife. Nvidia's board opened an independent investigation, led by independent directors with outside counsel.

• The board says it "has no reason to believe that either national security or NVIDIA secrets were compromised."

• Huang supports the review and stays on as CEO. He owns about 3.6% of Nvidia.

• Dan Ives called it a "black eye moment" for Huang.

• Earnings are Nov 17. Three House committee chairs have asked him to a closed-door briefing on Nov 18. That's two big events on back-to-back days.

Is this the bottom?

It is cheaper:

• Forward P/E ~20, PEG ~0.4

• Q3 guidance is unchanged at $108B ±2%

• Peers rallied the same day, so the business story hasn't changed

But the bottom isn't proven:

• $178.67 is 12.7% below the 200-day ($204.67) and 26.6% below the 52-week high ($243.37)

• The board investigation has no end date

• The 52-week low ($164.27) is 8.1% below. That's the first real support if the investigation drags on.

Buying the bottom during an open investigation into the CEO is guessing. Selling a put 16% lower, once the events are behind us, is pricing.

Checking it against my rules

❌ Trend: 12.7% below the 200-day. My first rule fails.

❌ Earnings: Nov 17 falls inside the Dec 18 expiry. I don't sell before earnings.

⚠️ Investigation: open, with no timeline

The strike resets

On Sunday my line was $160. After Monday's $8 drop, $160 is only 10.4% below the price, with delta 0.23. That's too close, so I move down.

Dec 18, 38 days, at about 55% IV:

• 1 standard deviation down ≈ $147

• $145 has delta 0.10, too far out to be worth selling

• $150 has delta 0.14, model premium ≈ $2.37, break-even ≈ $147.6

• $150 is 16% below Monday's close and 8.7% below the 52-week low

When I'll actually sell it

1. Earnings (Nov 17) and the House briefing (Nov 18) are behind us

2. Nothing new and negative from the board investigation

3. A daily close back above the 200-day

Then I re-price the strike at that day's IV and size it as Tier 1: 5% of the account, stop at 2× the credit, take profit at 50%.

Want chip exposure right now? AMD passed my rules this week; NVDA hasn't yet. The strike moves with the price. My rules don't.

Personal framework, education only, not advice. The premium is a Black-Scholes estimate, not a live quote. Allegations reported in the media are unproven. Options carry risk, including assignment.

#NVDA #Nvidia #SellPut #Options #RiskManagement

# Jensen Huang is embroiled in an extramarital affair scandal, causing Nvidia's stock price to plummet in overnight trading, exacerbating the situation for chip stocks! Is it possible to buy at the bottom now?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet