To The Moon

$ETFS Semiconductor ETF(SEMI.AU)$ $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ $Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing(TSM)$ $SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC(SMCI)$ $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$

Trump's Semiconductor Tariff Shake-Up

Alright, Tigers—this is a Huge one. The trade war is far from over. Over the past two weeks, we’ve seen a wave of tariff measures hit global markets, but this latest move is on another level. It risks undermining one of the last major advantages the U.S. holds—not just in terms of economic power, but also geopolitical influence.

Donald Trump is now pushing for a 25% tariff on vehicle imports, semiconductors, and chips. These crucial imports are about to become significantly more expensive, meaning car prices are set to rise sharply. But today, I want to focus on semiconductors because this decision could severely damage America’s chances of winning the global tech race.

In 2023, the U.S. manufacturing trade deficit soared to $1.2 trillion, while China posted a massive $1.8 trillion trade surplus. As this deficit grows, it increases economic instability and weakens the U.S. dollar. If global markets continue buying from China, the dollar’s dominance as a trade currency will further erode, leaving the U.S. highly dependent on foreign imports—a dangerous position to be in.

Trump’s goal is clear: reverse this trend and bring manufacturing back to the U.S. He has repeatedly emphasized his commitment to reshoring production, but the challenges are enormous.

1. Lack of demand for U.S. cars – American automakers are struggling to compete globally, and catching up to China could take decades.

2. High production costs – Manufacturing in the U.S. is expensive, making it difficult to produce low-cost goods.

This is why Trump’s real strategy is to double down on technology and AI. Advancements in artificial intelligence and automation could drastically lower production costs, transforming the U.S. into a manufacturing superpower and the global leader in AI and cryptocurrency.

Losing the AI race isn’t an option for the U.S. If China continues spreading its AI technology worldwide, it could weaken the U.S. dollar, disrupt key industries, and reduce global investment in the American economy. Trump understands this, which is why he’s making aggressive moves to protect U.S. technological dominance.

Just last week, Trump pressured TSMC, one of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers, to... (to be continued).

America's Grand Economic Strategy

Trump’s push to have Intel run U.S. factories is a major move. TSMC, the world’s leading chip manufacturer, produces semiconductors for companies like Nvidia, which depend on them for chip production. Right now, these chips are designed in the U.S., manufactured in Taiwan, and then shipped back to the States.

This is no simple request. TSMC is a pure manufacturing company, while Intel both designs and manufactures its own chips. Merging their operations would be an incredibly complex challenge. But when you consider this plan alongside Trump’s proposed 25% tariff, the bigger picture becomes clearer.

AI chips are one of the last major advantages the U.S. holds over China in the global tech industry. By placing tariffs on foreign-made semiconductors, computer chips, and pharmaceuticals, Trump aims to force production back to the U.S..

The Strategy: Carrots? No. Just the Stick.

Most semiconductor production left the U.S. for Taiwan, which now dominates 98% of the advanced chip market. But Trump’s plan is simple:

• No subsidies—companies won’t get money to build factories in the U.S.

• Instead, crippling tariffs (25%, 50%, or even 100%) will make it financially impossible for chipmakers to continue operations overseas.

• If companies want to avoid these tariffs, they’ll have no choice but to build their factories in the U.S.

This is a brutal, high-stakes economic play—using America’s massive consumer market as leverage to force geopolitical outcomes. Unlike past strategies that offered incentives ("the carrot"), this is purely a "stick" approach—pressuring companies through tariffs rather than financial aid.

The Ultimate Goal: AI Hardware Domination

Forget about shipbuilding—China already dominates that sector. Don’t bother competing in electric vehicles—the world is flooded with cheap Chinese EVs. That leaves one final frontier: AI hardware.

By imposing these tariffs, Trump aims to force Taiwan and South Korea to relocate semiconductor production to the U.S. If successful, this would mean:

• The world’s most advanced chips would be made on U.S. soil.

• Countries building AI models would have to rely on U.S.-made chips.

• The U.S. would regain its position as an export powerhouse, setting its own prices without foreign competition.

This is the AI value chain at work. While consumers interact with AI products like ChatGPT, Grok, and DeepSeek, these are just the final outputs. The real power lies at the start of the supply chain—in the production of AI chips.

With Nvidia already leading in chip design, the missing piece is physical chip production within the U.S.. If Trump can push TSMC and others to set up factories on American soil, the U.S. would effectively control the AI hardware pipeline, giving it enormous leverage over the rest of the world.

And if history has shown anything, it’s that the U.S. is unmatched in both sanctions and economic warfare. Should America successfully corner the AI hardware market, global dependence on U.S. technology would be absolute.

Why the U.S. Needs Semiconductor Hegemony

Under the Biden administration, we caught a glimpse of the U.S.'s grand strategy: dividing the world into economic blocs—allies, adversaries, and everyone else. This approach is reminiscent of the old colonial era, where economic and technological access is determined by geopolitical alignment.

The U.S. is essentially sorting countries into three tiers:

1. Tier 1 (Allies) – Nations like Canada, Japan, and Australia enjoy nearly unrestricted access to advanced U.S. semiconductor technology.

2. Tier 2 & 3 (Adversaries & the Rest) – Countries like China, Russia, and much of the developing world face severe restrictions on acquiring AI chips.

The Endgame: Controlling Global Economic Growth

By controlling who gets AI chips and who doesn’t, the U.S. is effectively placing a productivity cap on certain economies. The plan is to weaponize AI chip access—making it a closed-source technology.

If a country wants access to cutting-edge AI chips, it must be part of the U.S. economic ecosystem. That could mean:

• Cutting ties with China

• Lowering tariffs on U.S. exports

• Aligning with U.S. foreign policy

Just like oil and gas shaped global power dynamics in the past, AI chips will be the key resource of the future—and Trump wants the U.S. to dominate it entirely.

The Financial Crisis & AI Chip Leverage

The U.S. is facing a debt crisis. In a shocking revelation, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted that the U.S. can’t issue new long-term bonds because global demand for them is weak. Investors are demanding higher yields, fearing U.S. overspending and rising inflation.

This forces the U.S. to rely on short-term debt, leaving the national economy vulnerable to fluctuating interest rates. The financial system is already unstable—if the U.S. tries to lock in long-term debt (10–30 years), it could send bond yields skyrocketing, further destabilizing the economy.

AI Chips as a Bargaining Tool

However, if the U.S. controls the global AI chip supply, it can force countries to buy U.S. bonds in exchange for chip access. To gain Tier 1 status, nations may have to:

• Swap short-term U.S. bonds for long-term ones (even 100-year bonds with near-zero yields)

• Strengthen their financial ties with the U.S.

This could become a powerful economic weapon, allowing the U.S. to maintain its financial dominance.

The Challenge: Is U.S. Chip Production Sustainable?

Despite this grand strategy, manufacturing chips in the U.S. presents serious challenges. According to TSMC’s founder, Morris Chang, U.S. efforts to ramp up domestic semiconductor production are wasteful and expensive due to:

• High production costs

• A shortage of skilled manufacturing talent

So, will TSMC relocate more of its production to the U.S.? That remains to be seen.

The battle for semiconductor supremacy is about much more than technology—it’s about global economic control. And right now, the U.S. is betting that AI chips will be the key to securing its geopolitical dominance.

Why This Could Backfire on the U.S. Economy

Trump’s 25% tariff may force TSMC to relocate production to the U.S. in the short term, given that over 65% of its revenue comes from the American market. Compared to all other countries combined, the U.S. remains TSMC’s biggest customer—so a move to American soil isn’t out of the question.

However, this shift won’t be an easy win for the U.S. economy.

Higher Costs Across the Board

Building chips in the U.S. means significantly higher production costs, including:

• Expensive labor

• High energy prices

• Land and infrastructure costs

Even with subsidies, U.S. manufacturing is inherently more expensive. According to Mizuho Bank, chips made in the U.S. would cost 30% more than those produced in Taiwan.

The Fallout for AI and Tech Companies

For TSMC, this cost increase means U.S.-made chips will be uncompetitive in global markets—unless they relocate their entire production ecosystem, which would eliminate Taiwan’s leverage over the U.S. and be a strategic disaster for Taipei.

For U.S. AI companies, the impact is even worse. The biggest losers? Nvidia, Apple, and Meta.

• Nvidia’s cutting-edge AI chips are currently made in Taiwan, keeping production costs reasonable.

• If chip manufacturing moves to the U.S., prices will skyrocket, making AI hardware far more expensive.

• Higher chip costs will inflate R&D and capital expenditures (CapEx) for U.S. tech giants.

The Cost Spiral

Tech companies already spend massive amounts on R&D and infrastructure. For example:

• Meta’s AI budget alone is expected to hit $65 billion this year.

• Capital expenditures for AI are projected to increase by 50% from 2024.

If chip costs double or triple due to U.S. manufacturing, it will:

• Squeeze cash flow for American tech companies.

• Reduce profitability for firms like Nvidia, Apple, and Meta.

• Make AI solutions prohibitively expensive, limiting adoption across the broader economy.

The Bigger Picture

Rather than strengthening the U.S. tech industry, Trump’s tariffs could undermine it. By forcing higher costs on domestic companies, his policy risks:

• Weakening America’s AI leadership

• Reducing competitiveness in the global semiconductor market

• Slowing AI innovation due to skyrocketing production costs

Ultimately, this strategy could backfire spectacularly, making the U.S. less competitive rather than strengthening its position in the AI and semiconductor race.

Why China Stands to Gain More

While Trump’s semiconductor tariffs aim to protect U.S. manufacturing, they could end up giving China the upper hand.

China’s Cost Advantage

It’s only a matter of time before China develops its own advanced chips, but the key difference is cost-efficiency. Chinese firms can:

• Produce chips at a fraction of U.S. costs

• Scale faster due to lower manufacturing expenses

• Undercut U.S. competitors in price-sensitive markets

For example, some of China’s latest AI models—such as DeepSeek-V6—offer top-tier performance while costing 5 to 10 times less than Western alternatives.

The Domino Effect Higher Costs for U.S. Firms

If Trump enforces a 25% tariff on semiconductors, it could trigger a cascade of negative consequences:

1. U.S. companies will struggle with higher production costs, forcing them to spend 2 to 3 times more to compete.

2. Supply chain disruptions will further inflate costs, making U.S. chips uncompetitive.

3. AI firms will face skyrocketing R&D and infrastructure expenses, limiting growth and innovation.

The Blind Spot: China’s Global Market Opportunity

• Countries banned from U.S. chips will turn to Chinese alternatives, even if they’re a generation or two behind.

• China will fill the gap in emerging markets, gaining influence over nations seeking affordable AI hardware.

• As a result, U.S. semiconductor hegemony could erode faster than anticipated.

Effect on the U.S. Economy

While moving chip production to the U.S. may create jobs in the short term, it could ultimately:

• Weaken the U.S. tech sector by increasing costs across the board

• Slow down AI development due to expensive domestic chips

• Hand China an opportunity to dominate the global semiconductor market

By focusing on tariffs without addressing supply chain efficiency and cost competitiveness, the U.S. risks falling behind rather than pulling ahead.

@Daily_Discussion @TigerPM @TigerObserver @Tiger_comments @TigerClub

Disclaimer: I want to make it clear that I am not a financial advisor, and nothing I say is intended to be a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Additionally, it's important to remember that there are no guarantees or certainties in trading or investing, and you should never invest money that you can't afford to lose.