To The Moon

I buy the thesis, but not necessarily the price after a 14% jump. AI creates a strong structural tailwind for cybersecurity. More autonomous agents mean more identities, endpoints, cloud workloads and attack surfaces to monitor. Security is also one of the harder IT budgets to cut when the threat itself is getting stronger. But cybersecurity cannot simply replace the semiconductor trade. The addressable spending pool is much smaller, and after CRWD and PANW jumped 13%+ in one session, a lot of enthusiasm has been pulled forward. So I would buy the theme, not chase the spike. CRWD and PANW are my preferred names on a pullback. The real confirmation comes when AI-security fears translate into sustained ARR growth, larger contracts and higher guidance. More dangerous AI = more security spendi

For me, Burry closing his Dec 2026 NVDA puts is interesting, but I would not take it as a reason to turn bullish immediately. It suggests even a well-known bear is becoming more selective about the timing of the downside trade while Nvidia’s fundamentals remain strong. I am more focused on Jensen Huang’s US$3–4 trillion AI infrastructure opportunity through 2030. If AI spending keeps expanding across hyperscalers, enterprises, neoclouds and sovereign AI, Nvidia has multiple ways to capture that growth. Its move toward full rack-scale systems and higher-value platforms also increases its exposure to AI capex. That said, I would still watch valuation closely. Strong demand does not mean the stock is cheap. I remain cautiously bullish and would prefer accumulating on meaningful pullbacks rat

For me, today’s selloff looks more like a repricing than a sign that the AI cycle is over. If frontier model development slows, I think AI spending could simply shift from training the next massive model toward inference and deploying existing models at scale. I am especially watching AI agents and inference demand. As companies like Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta integrate AI deeper into everyday workflows, the demand for GPUs, HBM, networking and data-center power could remain strong. In some ways, broader inference adoption could create an even wider market than frontier training. That said, I would not ignore valuation risk. If cloud companies start cutting capex while GPU utilization, HBM orders and networking demand weaken together, that would be a much more serious warning. For

🌟🌟🌟Is $Oracle(ORCL)$ a  Buy or Sell? The case to Buy:  When Larry Ellison cancels a share sale, it signals that he believes the stock is undervalued & better days are still ahead. Oracle's backlog growth: Oracle's remaining performance obligations have grown rapidly, showing that the long term pipeline for its cloud and AI infrastructure services is robust. The Case To sell: Squeezed Cash Flow: Oracle is spending billions on GPUs & building massive global data centres.  This exerts heavy pressure in the short term. Execution Risk: Building infrastructure is capital intensive. The Verdict: Hold firm if you believe in Larry Ellison's track record & view Oracle as a winner in the AI cloud infrastructure race over a long t

$ParkwayLife Reit(C2PU.SI)$   ParkwayLife Reit - I think gd price is back. At 3.98, yield is about 4.4 percent seem not bad. ParkwayLife Reit - 1st Half Results is out! DPU is up 14.6 percent to 8.77 cents. DI is up 14.6 percent to 57.2m, awesome.XD 12th August, paydate 8th September 2026. Estimating yearly dividend of 17.54 cents, yield is about 4.18%, seem not bad! gross revenue for the half year stood at S$77.1 million, while net property income was S$72.4 million. Compared to the corresponding period last year, gross revenue and net property income have declined by 1.6% and 2.0% respectively, mainly due to the depreciation of the Japanese Yen and lower rental income from affected Japan assets. These were partially offset by continued c

For me, $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ and $Cloudflare, Inc.(NET)$ stand out the most. AI growth is creating more demand for cybersecurity and connectivity infrastructure. CRWD has strong ARR growth and cash flow, while NET benefits from rising AI workloads. I would rather watch these names than chase the energy rally after such a strong run. I am also watching $Marathon Petroleum(MPC)$ and $Valero(VLO

For me, Monday looks more like a rotation than a real change in the AI story. The market is questioning how fast AI training spending can grow, which explains the sharp selloff in memory and semiconductors. But a few comments about slowing frontier AI development are not enough to invalidate the huge AI infrastructure investments already underway. I find the cybersecurity move more interesting. The more AI systems and agents enter production, the more security and monitoring they will need. That makes CRWD and PANW interesting to me, although after such a strong one-day rally, I would rather wait for a better entry than chase. I am also watching the 10-year yield and oil closely because they are more immediate valuation risks. If yields stay near 5%, high-growth AI stocks could face more

AI Chip Stocks Are Selling Off Hard: Should Investors Buy, Hedge, or Wait? AI hardware stocks came under heavy selling pressure on Monday. The $PHLX Semiconductor Index (.SOX.US)$ fell more than 5% intraday, with $NVIDIA(NVDA)$   , $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$  , $Broadcom(AVGO)$   and $Micron Technology(MU)$   among the biggest decliners. Meanwhile, $Microsoft (MSFT.US)$ , $Alphabet-C (GOOG.US)$ and $Meta Platforms (META.US)$ moved higher, while cybersecurity stocks

I’d pick ② Identity security. The biggest AI-security shift is not just protecting models—it’s controlling what autonomous agents are allowed to do. An AI agent can access databases, execute code, move data and trigger workflows at machine speed. That makes traditional “user login” security increasingly inadequate. CrowdStrike is already building dedicated agent identities and continuous authorization, while Zscaler is developing Zero Trust controls specifically for AI agents. The interesting part is the economics: every new AI agent deployed into an enterprise could create another identity, permission set and attack surface that needs protection. So cybersecurity may become an unavoidable AI infrastructure tax. The winners won’t simply be companies selling “AI security” — they’ll be thos

I would choose C. I remain bullish on AI infrastructure because slowing frontier-model development does not mean companies will suddenly stop investing in chips, memory, data centers and power. The existing AI workloads still need to be supported, and enterprise adoption is still developing. I would not blindly follow the $315 million options trade either. Even if Leopold is behind it, large funds have different risk tolerance and strategies from retail investors. I see the trade as a useful signal, but not a reason to chase AI stocks after a sharp move. With Triple Witching this Friday, I would expect more short-term volatility. I would rather use any excessive pullback to gradually DCA into strong AI infrastructure names than try to predict every move. For me, the long-term AI story rem

🌟🌟🌟The count down is on for $SpaceX(SPCX)$ to double its weighting in the Nasdaq 100 index from 1.28% to 2.82% on September 21 2026. The Trader's Dilemma: Should I FOMO into SpaceX or wait for a pullback? The Case For Buying Now: Index tracking funds must hold the correct weight.  That means $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ will be forced to buy USD 12.4 billion to USD 15.5 billion worth of SpaceX stock. SpaceX has recently been locked in AI compute deals which include a fresh USD 1.11 billion a month contract aimed at increasing their annual recurring revenue towards USD 100 billion by end of 2026. The Case For Waiting:  There is SpaceX Lockup Expiration from late September to November.  While August

I agree most with the bullish view on $NEBIUS(NBIS)$ . AI infrastructure remains a strong long-term theme for me, and its potential recurring-revenue growth makes the $355 target interesting. I am holding NBIS for the mid-to-long term, focusing more on execution and contract growth than short-term price moves. $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ also stands out. Its huge user base and advertising business give it multiple ways to monetize AI investments. The $820 target is aggressive, but stronger AI adoption could justify higher expectations. I am more cautious on $Novo-Nordisk A/S(<

Magnificent Seven (MAGS) ETF Bullish Nested Framework in Play By EWFHendraSeptember 14, 2026 · 2 min read The Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) captures the performance of seven dominant U.S. technology and growth companies, giving investors concentrated exposure to some of the market’s most influential names. Since inception, MAGS has displayed pronounced directional swings that align well with Elliott Wave analysis, marked by distinct impulsive rallies and corrective pullbacks that define its medium‑term trend structure. MAGS Weekly Elliott Wave Chart The weekly Elliott Wave view of the Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) highlights a powerful nesting structure from its all‑time low. The advance to $58.69 completed Super Cycle wave (I), followed by a corrective decline in wave (II) that bottomed at