[Event Registration] 21st September | Options for the Everyday Investor | Samuel Wong
Want to start trading options but feel overwhelmed by the complexity? The Tiger Options Bootcamp is designed to simplify options for complete beginners. Join Samuel Wong, Investment Representative at Tiger Brokers (Singapore), as he walks through what options are, how they work in real markets, and how traders use them to manage risk and capitalise on opportunities. The session closes with a hands-on walkthrough of placing an order on the Tiger Trade App, so you leave having actually done it once. What you'll get from this session: ✅ No prior experience required ✅ Step-by-step learning, built for complete beginners ✅ Face-to-face, hands-on order placement walkthrough ✅ Interactive live Q&A 🎟️ Registration: A registration fee of 50 Tiger Coins is required to reserve your spot. 🎁 Attenda
Margin Account 101 | 07 How much interest do you actually pay when you trade on margin?
Margin interest is generally calculated on the following factors: amount actually borrowed × annual rate × number of days actually used Tiger accrues margin interest daily and charges it monthly; the day-count basis may differ by currency. The current annual margin rate for AUD, USD, HKD and CNH is 7.99%, but rates may change — the figures shown in your account and on the official pages prevail. Important: This material is provided for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial product advice, investment advice, or a recommendation. Margin lending, short selling, and other leveraged trading strategies involve significant risks and may not be suitable for all investors. Losses may exceed your initial investment. Before investing, consider whether t
CRWD Gained More in One Session Than its Entire Market Cap was Worth Five Years Ago
$CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ gained more in one session than its entire market cap was worth five years ago $CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.(CRWD)$ made new ATHs today after a massive 13% rally the day before. This is the same stock that traded at $190 a month ago, so the move off the August low is already 24% Key Catalysts Agentic SOC launch: CrowdStrike rolled out an AI-driven security operations center that automates investigations across endpoints, identity, cloud and AI systems, alongside SafeMind (built on Nvidia's stack), Falcon Guardian, and Falcon IQ Wall Street re-rating: 6 major Wall Street firms all raised or reiterated bullish targets today, some as high as $3
The Sentiment in the Market is Very Bearish Right Now
The Sentiment in the market is very bearish right now. 1. Anthropic + OpenAI Ceo + Musk calling for a slowdown in AI 2. Oil + 10 year Treasury Yields elevated 3. Iran war ongoing. 4. 85%+ chance of interest rates rising tomorrow. The most bullish scenario we need to see is a 25 bps rate hike + No more hikes the rest of the year, End of the Iran war to bring down oil and inflation. If this happens, $S&P 500(.SPX)$ and $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ new all time highs coming next month. $S&P 500(.SPX)$ <7550 = Bearish $S&P 500(.SPX)$ > 7650 = Bullish
OXY, TEM, DOCU, META& AVGO Wait for Another Recovery Here
Hello everyone! Today i want to share some technical analysis with you! 1 $Broadcom(AVGO)$ just printed its lowest daily RSI reading in over 16 months 🌶️ 2 $Meta Platforms, Inc.(META)$ making a break for it 👀 3 $Docusign(DOCU)$ just broke out to its highest price of 2026 👀 4 Back in Stage 2 for the first time since Oct 2025 🟢 $Tempus AI(TEM)$ 5 Buffett favorite heading straight for 2026 highs 👀 $Occidental(OXY)$ When markets keep you watching, knowing when to switch off matters too. A strong U.S. jobs
$SPX Could Get a Relief Rally Before the Next Drop
$S&P 500(.SPX)$ The selloff has delivered the W5 leg lower, and now the setup is starting to look a little different. 👀 Bullish SMT against $NASDAQ 100(NDX)$ is giving the S&P 500 room for a corrective bounce into the FOMC. I’d expect the first move to stay fairly modest, with 7650–7700 as the initial zone to watch. But I’m not treating that bounce as a trend change. ⚠️ The bigger picture still looks vulnerable. If $SPX reaches that 7650–7700 area, I’d be watching closely for the relief move to run out of steam and sellers to step back in. So for now: 📈 W5 downside leg appears in place 🔄 Bullish SMT supports a corrective rebound 🎯 First bounce zone: 7650–7700 ⚠️ FOMC could provide the catalyst 📉 An
$VanEck Semiconductor ETF(SMH)$ is sitting in an interesting spot. After the recent weakness, today’s candle showed some hesitation right around the lower Bollinger Band. That kind of price action can leave room for a tactical bounce before the next bigger move takes shape. 👀 The gap above is the level I’m watching first. If price starts moving toward it, that could keep $SMH stuck in another choppy session rather than giving us a clean directional move. But the downside levels still matter. ⚠️ No bounce and the pressure can build quickly toward 520, with 508 becoming the next level to watch. So for now, I’m keeping it simple: 📈 Bounce from the lower band → watch the gap 🌀 Gap pull → expect more chop 📉 No bounce → 520, then 508 come into focus $SMH
The Central Daily Level (CDL) anticipated yesterday for the $S&P 500(.SPX)$ at 7,620 was lost right at the opening today. There was no early warning for a bounce, and momentum remained bearish throughout the day with that level as resistance. Price action breached the first daily support level of 7,592 and found consolidation around the weekly level of 7,585. Momentum is bearish. The gap left behind on August 8th at 7,610 was finally closed yesterday, and price action continued its downward trend. The question today is: Will the Nasdaq100 follow? 28,842K is a bearish magnet and 29,2K is a bullish one, The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) kicked off its September policy meeting today. Interest rate expectations consider a 92% probability of
$SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ Based on GEX analysis, SPY is likely to close at 750 this week — rate hike or not, that's the price. Barring any surprises, low-level consolidation should begin next week. Also interesting: GLD saw a buy-side opening of 15,000 contracts on the 430 Call $GLD 20261120 430.0 CALL$ — suggesting gold has a high probability of bottoming out after Friday's meeting. $United States Oil Fund LP(USO)$ Everyone thinks Trump is about to make a deal, but before any deal, there will surely be one more round of death threats. Generally, Trump chooses to announce during trading hours on a weekday — he won't pick a weekend wh
My pick: D — Expectations are already high. I’m still bullish on Nvidia’s business, but at this stage, the biggest risk isn’t whether AI demand exists—it’s whether future growth can beat what the market has already priced in. The US$3–4 trillion AI infrastructure opportunity is enormous, and Nvidia’s move from GPUs toward full AI systems, networking, robotics and cybersecurity could expand its addressable market significantly. But a great company doesn’t automatically mean a great stock at any valuation. Rising competition, supply constraints, customer concentration and eventually slowing growth could all pressure the multiple. Burry closing his puts is interesting, but I wouldn’t treat it as a buy signal. For NVDA, execution must keep outrunning expectations.
I think the 50% share can hold in the near term, but it is becoming a much higher bar to clear. Goldman itself expects AI infrastructure beneficiaries to drive roughly half of S&P 500 earnings growth, while Q2 data showed AI infrastructure already contributing about one-third of EPS growth. The key question is no longer whether companies will spend on AI—they clearly are. It is whether that spending converts into recurring revenue and margins. If hyperscalers keep expanding capex, the suppliers can continue winning. But if financing costs rise or ROI disappoints, the earnings concentration becomes the market's biggest vulnerability. So my view: 50% can persist, but it probably cannot keep rising indefinitely. AI remains the engine; valuation and cash-flow discipline decide how far the
For me, I would choose A — Hike 25bp. The latest inflation data is too sticky to ignore, especially with core CPI accelerating and oil prices back above US$100. I think the Fed would rather make a small adjustment now than risk allowing inflation expectations to become harder to control later. I would not expect a 50bp hike at this stage because that could create unnecessary pressure on economic growth and financial markets. A 25bp hike would be a more measured approach, while keeping the door open for the Fed to pause if inflation starts cooling again. If the Fed hikes, my pick for the biggest short-term impact is 🤖 AI & tech stocks. Higher rates usually put pressure on high-valuation growth stocks because future earnings become less attractive when discounted at higher rates. I rema
For me, 50% is already a very meaningful contribution, and I think AI can maintain a large share of S&P 500 $S&P 500(.SPX)$ earnings growth. The AI cycle is no longer just about chips. It is spreading into cloud, data centres, networking, software and productivity gains. That said, I would not expect AI spending to grow at this pace forever. Oracle shows both sides of the story: huge future demand, but also massive CapEx and cash flow pressure. The market will increasingly reward companies that can turn AI demand into real earnings and cash flow. I remain bullish on AI long term, but I prefer selective accumulation rather than chasing. For me, the next phase is not about who spends the most, but who can turn that spending into sustainab
AI booming too fast? Will the world become like terminator?
Disclaimer: Nothing I say or post should be considered financial advice. Please do your own due diligence before making any investment decisions. So even AI creators themselves are worried and concerned about the rapid rate that AI is developing right now. The main researcher from Anthropic recently left his post, verbalizing his concern that AI might cause human extinction by the end of this decade. Strong words indeed from an industry expert. Every company are just pushing each other to improve their AI models in order to keep up with demand. But are they shooting themselves in their foot because of this constant rat race? So with everything such as escalating Iran/US conflict, Fed rate decision, constant questions revolving around pace of AI innovation, steaming CPI/PPI numbers, tradit
$Surf Air Mobility Inc.(SRFM)$ 🔴 SRFM — Extremely Negative Review ⭐ 1/5 — A stock that keeps finding new ways to disappoint Surf Air Mobility (SRFM) has become an extremely frustrating speculative stock. Even when the company releases apparently positive developments, the share price seems unable to sustain meaningful upward momentum. Instead, shareholders have watched the stock grind lower from around $0.80, through $0.70 and $0.60, and now toward the $0.50 area. The biggest concern is that good news isn't translating into shareholder returns. The recent Mokulele contract should have been encouraging, yet the market continues to punish the stock. That suggests investors are much more concerned about losses, financing requirements, dilution and t
I keep hearing the bull case, and apparently it now requires Kevin Warsh and the Fed to perform a magic trick. Suppose Warsh miraculously doesn’t hike. Fantastic. Pop the champagne, fire up the algos and buy everything because disaster has officially been postponed until the next FOMC meeting. Except the threat of a hike doesn’t disappear. It simply becomes the charming little macro landmine sitting underneath the market for the rest of the year. Every inflation print, jobs number, oil spike and Fed speech becomes another episode of “Will They or Won’t They?” And if the Fed does hike? Congratulations—the bulls get the tightening they insist is already priced in. If the Fed doesn’t hike? Congratulations again—the market gets to spend the next few months wondering when Warsh finally pulls th
US 10-Year Yields Reach 5%, Highest Since 2023
Benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields climbed above 5% on Monday.
I buy the thesis, but not necessarily the price after a 14% jump. AI creates a strong structural tailwind for cybersecurity. More autonomous agents mean more identities, endpoints, cloud workloads and attack surfaces to monitor. Security is also one of the harder IT budgets to cut when the threat itself is getting stronger. But cybersecurity cannot simply replace the semiconductor trade. The addressable spending pool is much smaller, and after CRWD and PANW jumped 13%+ in one session, a lot of enthusiasm has been pulled forward. So I would buy the theme, not chase the spike. CRWD and PANW are my preferred names on a pullback. The real confirmation comes when AI-security fears translate into sustained ARR growth, larger contracts and higher guidance. More dangerous AI = more security spendi
For me, Burry closing his Dec 2026 NVDA puts is interesting, but I would not take it as a reason to turn bullish immediately. It suggests even a well-known bear is becoming more selective about the timing of the downside trade while Nvidia’s fundamentals remain strong. I am more focused on Jensen Huang’s US$3–4 trillion AI infrastructure opportunity through 2030. If AI spending keeps expanding across hyperscalers, enterprises, neoclouds and sovereign AI, Nvidia has multiple ways to capture that growth. Its move toward full rack-scale systems and higher-value platforms also increases its exposure to AI capex. That said, I would still watch valuation closely. Strong demand does not mean the stock is cheap. I remain cautiously bullish and would prefer accumulating on meaningful pullbacks rat
For me, today’s selloff looks more like a repricing than a sign that the AI cycle is over. If frontier model development slows, I think AI spending could simply shift from training the next massive model toward inference and deploying existing models at scale. I am especially watching AI agents and inference demand. As companies like Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta integrate AI deeper into everyday workflows, the demand for GPUs, HBM, networking and data-center power could remain strong. In some ways, broader inference adoption could create an even wider market than frontier training. That said, I would not ignore valuation risk. If cloud companies start cutting capex while GPU utilization, HBM orders and networking demand weaken together, that would be a much more serious warning. For
Investing in $Intel(INTC)$ is like deciding whether to buy a house that needs a lot of fixing up. It could be worth a lot more later, or it could cost you more time & money than expected. Reasons to buy Intel: The US government wants chips to be made in America & they are giving Intel billions in support to make that happen. The Comeback Plan: Intel is building massive new factories to make chips for other companies, which could unlock huge new profits in a few years. High Demand: Right now, there is a shortage of computer processors or CPUs. Because of this, Intel can charge higher prices for its products. Reasons to Pause: Tough competition: Fierce rivals like AMD are still winning a lot of market share & I